Incorporation of Velocity Pulses in Design Ground Motions for Response History Analysis Using a Probabilistic Framework

Abstract

Ground motions that contain velocity pulses may cause greater structural damage than ground motions that do not contain pulses. The effects of pulse-like motions are best approximated in the time domain using nonlinear response history analysis. Current approaches for incorporating pulse effects are not reproducible since they largely rely on engineering judgment and often result in unrealistic representation of the hazard. This study extends a method by Shahi and Baker (2011) that incorporates the effects of pulse-like motions in probabilistic seismic hazard analyses (PSHA). It uses disaggregation information from the PSHA to construct suites of target spectra that are used for matching an appropriate proportion of pulse-like motions with characteristics (pulse amplitude and pulse period) representative of a desired hazard intensity level. The methodology has been successfully employed for several high-profile projects in California that were subjected to a rigorous peer review process, including the Transbay Tower in San Francisco.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahamson

N. A.

2000. Effects of rupture directivity on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, Sixth International Conf. Seismic Zonation, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.

Alavi

and Krawinkler

2001. Effects of Near-Fault Ground Motions on Frame Structures, Technical Report Blume Center Report 138, Stanford, CA.

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2010. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-10, Reston, VA.

Baker

J. W.

2011. Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground motion selection, Journal of Structural Engineering 137, 322–331.

Baker

J. W.

and Jayaram

2008. Correlation of spectral acceleration values from NGA ground motion models, Earthquake Spectra 24, 299–317.

Baker

J. W.

2007. Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 97, 1486–1501.

Bray

J. D.

and Rodriguez-Marek

2004. Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 24, 815–828.

California Building Code (CBC), 2010. California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2, California Building Standards Commission, Sacramento, CA.

Champion

and Liel

2012. The effect of near-fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 41, 1391–1409.

10.

Chiou

Darragh

Gregor

and Silva

2008. NGA Project strong motion database, Earthquake Spectra 24, 23–44.

11.

EZ-FRISK, 2011. EZ-FRISK, Software for Earthquake Ground Motion Estimation, Version 7.62, Risk Engineering.

12.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2009. NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA P-750 Report, Washington, D.C.

13.

Grant

D. N.

2011. Response spectral matching of two horizontal ground-motion components, Journal of Structural Engineering 137, 289–297.

14.

Grant

D. N.

2012. Preservation of velocity pulses in response spectral matching, 15^th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.

15.

Grant

D. N.

and Diaferia

2013. Assessing adequacy of spectrally matched ground motions for response history analysis, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42, 1265–1280.

16.

Hancock

Bommer

J. J.

and Stafford

P. J.

2008. Numbers of scaled and matched acceler-ograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37, 1585–1607.

17.

Huang

Y.-N.

Whittaker

A. S.

and Luco

2008. Maximum spectral demands in the near-fault region, Earthquake Spectra 24, 319–341.

18.

Lin

Harmsen

S. C.

Baker

J. W.

and Luco

2013. Conditional spectrum computation incorporating multiple causal earthquakes and ground motion prediction models, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103, 1103–1116.

19.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 2012. Selecting and Scaling Earthquake Ground Motions For Performing Response-History Analyses, NIST GCR 11-917-15, prepared by the NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture for the Gaithersburg, MD.

20.

Oasys, 2012. Oasys Sismic: Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Program, Version 9.2.0.10b, by Arup.

21.

Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), 2010. Technical Report for the PEER Ground Motion Database Web Application, Beta-Version, University of California, Berkeley.

22.

Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), 2013. PEER NGA-West2 Database, University of California, Berkeley.

23.

Rodriguez-Marek

and Bray

J. D.

2006. Site response for near-fault forward directivity ground motions, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 132, 1611–1620.

24.

Shahi

S. K.

2013. A Probabilistic Framework to Include the Effects of Near-Fault Directivity in Seismic Hazard Assessment, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, available at http://purl.stanford.edu/hb804nv7861.

25.

Shahi

S. K.

and Baker

J. W.

2013. NGA-West2 Models for Ground-Motion Directionality, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA

26.

Shahi

S. K.

and Baker

J. W.

2011. An empirically calibrated framework for including the effects of near-fault directivity in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 101, 742–755.

27.

Somerville

P. G.

Smith

N. F.

Graves

R. W.

and Abrahamson

N. A.

1997. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity, Seismological Research Letters 68, 199–222.

28.

Stewart

J. P.

Abrahamson

N. A.

Atkinson

G. M.

Baker

Boore

D. M.

Bozorgnia

Campbell

K. W.

Comartin

C. D.

Idriss

I. M.

Lew

Mehrain

Moehle

J. P.

Naeim

and Sabol

T. A.

2011. Representation of bi-directional ground motions for design spectra in building codes, Earthquake Spectra 27, 927–937.

29.

Tothong

and Cornell

C. A.

2008. Structural performance assessment under near-source pulse-like ground motions using advanced ground motion intensity measures, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 37, 1013–1037.

30.

Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, 2003. Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region 2002–2031, USGS Open File Report 03-214, available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-214/.