The bridge reliability in networks (BRAN) methodology introduced in the companion paper is applied to evaluate the reliability of part of the highway bridge network in South Carolina under a selected seismic scenario. The case study demonstrates Bayesian updating of deterioration parameters across bridges after spatial interpolation of data acquired from limited instrumented bridges. The updated deterioration parameters inform aging bridge seismic fragility curves through multi-dimensional integration of parameterized fragility models, which are utilized to derive bridge failure probabilities. The paper establishes the correlation structure among bridge failures from three information sources to generate realizations of bridge failures for network-level reliability assessments by Monte Carlo analysis. Positive correlations improve the reliability of the case study network, as predicted from network topology. The benefits of the BRAN methodology are highlighted in its applicability to large networks, while addressing some of the existing gaps in bridge network reliability and prioritization studies.
AngA. H.-S., and TangW. H., 2007. Probability concepts in engineering, Wiley.
3.
AtkinsonG. M., and BooreD. M., 1995. Ground-motion relations for eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85, 17–30.
4.
BocchiniP., and FrangopolD. M., 2011. A stochastic computational framework for the joint transportation network fragility analysis and traffic flow distribution under extreme events, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics26, 182–193.
5.
BommerJ. J., and CrowleyH., 2006. The influence of ground-motion variability in earthquake loss modeling, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering4, 231–248.
6.
BoyleP., BroadieM., and GlassermanP., 1997. Monte Carlo methods for security pricing, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control21, 1267–1321.
7.
CampbellK. W., 2003. Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion (attenuation) relations in eastern North America, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93, 1012–1033.
8.
ChangS. E., 2000. Disasters and transport systems: loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake, Journal of Transport Geography8, 53–65.
9.
ChoiE., DesRochesR., and NielsonB., 2004. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones, Engineering Structures26, 187–199.
10.
CornellC. A., FatemehJ., HamburgerR. O., and FoutchD. A., 2002. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines, Journal of Structural Engineering128, 526–533.
11.
EnrightM. P., and FrangopolD. M., 1999. Condition prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges using Bayesian updating, Journal of Structural Engineering125, 1118–1125.
12.
EnrightM. P., and FrangopolD. M., 1998. Probabilistic analysis of resistance degradation of reinforced concrete bridge beams under corrosion, Engineering Structures20, 960–971.
FrangopolD. M., LinK. Y., and EstesA. C., 1997. Reliability of reinforced concrete girders under corrosion attack, Journal of Structural Engineering123, 286–297.
16.
FrankelA. D., PetersenM. D., MuellerC. S., HallerK. M., WheelerR. L., LeyendeckerE. V., WessonR. L., HarmsenS. C., CramerC. H., PerkinsD. M., and RukstalesK. S., 2002. Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-420, available at https://geohazards.usgs.gov/trac/export/152/NSHMP/trunk/docs/NSHM-2002-OFR02-420.pdf (last accessed 31 October 2012).
17.
FunahashiM., 1990. Predicting corrosion-free service life of a concrete structure in a chloride environment, ACI Materials Journal87, 581–587.
18.
GhoshJ., and PadgettJ. E., 2010. Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves, Journal of Structural Engineering136, 1497–1511.
19.
GhoshJ., and PadgettJ. E., 2012. Impact of Multiple Component Deterioration and Exposure Conditions on Seismic Vulnerability of Concrete Bridges, Earthquakes and Structures, 3, 649–673.
20.
HanQ., XiuliD., JingboL., ZhongxianL., LiyunL., and JianfendZ., 2009. Seismic damage of highway bridges during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration8, 263–273.
21.
KimS. H., and ShinozukaM., 2004. Development of fragility curves of bridges retrofitted by column jacketing, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics19, 105–112.
22.
LeeR., and KiremidjianA. S., 2007. Uncertainty and correlation for loss assessment of spatially distributed systems, Earthquake Spectra23, 753–770.
23.
LeischF., WeingesselA., and HornikK., 1998. On the generation of correlated artificial binary data, Working Paper No. 13, Working Paper Series, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Vienna, Austria, 17 pp.
24.
LiamK., RoyS., and NorthwoodD., 1992. Chloride ingress measurements and corrosion potential mapping study of a 24-year-old reinforced concrete jetty structure in a tropical marine environment, Magazine of Concrete Research44, 205–215.
25.
MackieK. R., and StojadinovicB., 2006. Post-earthquake functionality of highway overpass bridges, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics35, 77–93.
26.
MorokoffW. J., and CaflischR. E., 1995. Quasi-Monte Carlo integration, Journal of Computational Physics122, 218–230.
27.
MustafaM., and YusofK., 1994. Atmospheric chloride penetration into concrete in semitropical marine environment, Cement and Concrete Research24, 661–670.
28.
National Research Council (NRC), 1994. Practical Lessons from the Loma Prieta Earthquake: Report from a Symposium Sponsored by the Geotechnical Board and the Board on Natural Disasters of the National Research Council, Symposium held in conjunction with the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, the Geotechnical Board of the Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, the Board on Natural Disasters of the Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, and the Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources of the National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 274 pp.
29.
NewmanM. E. J., 2010. Networks: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, New York, 720 pp.
30.
NielsonB. G., 2005. Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones, Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
31.
NielsonB. G., and DesRochesR., 2007. Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States, Earthquake Spectra23, 615–633.
32.
PadgettJ. E., and DesRochesR., 2009. Retrofitted bridge fragility analysis for typical classes of multispan bridges, Earthquake Spectra25, 117–41.
33.
PadgettJ. E., DesRochesR., and NilssonE., 2010. Regional seismic risk assessment of bridge network in Charleston, South Carolina, Journal of Earthquake Engineering14, 918–933.
34.
R Development Core Team, 2010. The R Project for Statistical Computing, available at http://www.r-project.org/ [Accessed 30 December 2011].
35.
RokneddinK., GhoshJ., Dueñas-OsorioL., and PadgettJ., 2013. Bridge retrofit prioritization for aging transportation networks subject to seismic hazards, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9, 1050–1066.
ShomeN., and CornellC. A., 1999. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
38.
SuzukiM., TsutsumiT., and IrieM., 1990. Reliability analysis of durability/deterioration indices of reinforced concrete in a marine environment, in Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on “Corrosion of Reinforcement in Concrete,”Elsevier Applied Science, London, 268–277.
ToroG. R., AbrahamsonN. A., and SchneiderJ. F., 1997. Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and eastern North America: Best estimates and uncertainties, Seismological Research Letters68, 41–57.
42.
TrauthM. H., 2010. MATLAB® Recipes for Earth Sciences, Springer, New York, 336 pp.
43.
UjiK., MatsuokaT., and MaruyaT., 1990. Formulation of an equation for surface chloride content due to permeation of chloride, in Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on “Corrosion of Reinforcement in Concrete,”Elsevier Applied Science, London.
ValD. V., StewartM. G., and MelchersR. E., 1998. Effect of reinforcement corrosion on reliability of highway bridges, Engineering Structures20, 1010–1019.
46.
VuK. A. T., and StewartM. G., 2000. Structural reliability of concrete bridges including improved chloride-induced corrosion models, Structural Safety22, 313–333.
47.
WebsterR., and OliverM. A., 2008. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
48.
WongI., BouabidJ., GrafW., HuyckC., PorushA., SilvaW., SiegelT., BureauG., EguchiR., and KnightJ., 2005. Potential losses in a repeat of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake, Earthquake Spectra21, 1157–1184.
49.
ZenK., 2005. Corrosion and life cycle management of port structures, Corrosion Science47, 2353–2360.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
