Transect Survey as a Post-Disaster Global Rapid Damage Assessment Tool

Abstract

Following a damaging earthquake, the immediate emergency response is focused on individual collapsed buildings or other “hotspots” rather than the overall state of damage. This lack of attention to the global damage condition of the affected region can lead to the reporting of misinformation and generate confusion, causing difficulties when attempting to determine the level of post-disaster resources required. A pre-planned building damage survey based on the transect method is recommended as a simple tool to generate an estimate of the overall level of building damage in a city or region. A methodology for such a transect survey is suggested, and an example of a similar survey conducted in Christchurch, New Zealand, following the 22 February 2011 earthquake is presented. The transect was found to give suitably accurate estimates of building damage at a time when information was keenly sought by government authorities and the general public.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Applied Technology Council (ATC), 2005. Field Manual: Postearthquake Safety Evaluation of Buildings, ATC-20-1, Redwood City, CA.

Applied Technology Council (ATC), 2012. Building Safety Evaluation after the February 22, 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquake: Observations by the ATC Reconnaissance Team, available at http://canterbury.royalcommission.govt.nz/documents-by-key/20120829.5053 (last accessed 18 December 2013).

Asia One, 2011. N.Zealand says one-third of quake city faces demolition, 26 February 2011, available at http://news.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Asia/Story/A1Story20110226-265432.html (last accessed 9 April 2012).

BBC, 2011. Third of Christchurch buildings “could face demolition,” available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-1258704 (last accessed 9 April 2012).

Biggs

D. T.

2007. Keynote address-7IMC: Looking back at the World Trade Centre disaster, Masonry International 20, 1–10.

Bray

J. D.

Stewart

J. P.

Baturay

M. B.

Durgunoglu

Onalp

Sancio

R. B.

Ural

Ansal

Bardet

J. B.

Barka

Boulanger

Cetin

and Erten

2000. Damage patterns and foundation performance in Adapazari, Earthquake Spectra 16, 163–189.

Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA), 2013. Demolitions, available at http://cera.govt.nz/demolitions/list (last accessed 1 July 2013).

Christchurch City Council, 2011. CDEM: Public information update, Christchurch City Council, Christchurch, Media release.

Civil Infrastucture & Enginnering in New Zealand Group (Catalyst), 2012. Demolition continues in Christchurch, Blog post, available at http://catalystrecruit.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/demolition-continues-in-christchurch/.

10.

Clifton

Bruneau

MacRae

Leon

and Fussell

2011. Steel structures damage from the Christchurch earthquake series of 2010 and 2011, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 44, 297–318.

11.

Dizhur

Ingham

J. M.

Moon

L. M.

Griffith

M. C.

Schultz

Senaldi

Magenes

Dickie

Lissel

Centeno

Ventura

Leite

and Lourenco

2011. Performance of masonry buildings and of churches in the 22 February Christchurch earthquake, Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 44, 279–296.

12.

Elzinga

C. L.

Salzer

D. W.

Willoughby

J. W.

and Gibbs

J. P.

2001. Monitoring Plant and Animal Populations: A Handbook for Field Biologists, Wiley-Blackwell, Boston, 372 pp.

13.

Griffith

M. C.

Ingham

J. M.

and Weller

2010. Earthquake reconnaissance: Forensic engineering on an urban scale, Australian Journal of Structural Engineering 11, 63–74.

14.

The Guardian, 2011. Christchurch earthquake leaves third of city buildings facing demolition, The Guardian, 26 February 2011, available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/26/christchurch-earthquake-new-zealand-rescue (last accessed 9 April 2012).

15.

Ingham

J. M.

Biggs

D. T.

and Moon

L. M.

2011. How did unreinforced masonry buildings perform in the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake?, The Structural Engineer 89, 14–18.

16.

Ingham

J. M.

and Griffith

M. C.

2011a. Performance of unreinforced masonry buildings during the 2010 Darfield (Christchurch, NZ) earthquake, Australian Journal of Structural Engineering 11, 207–224.

17.

Ingham

J. M.

and Griffith

M. C.

2011b. The Performance of Earthquake-Strengthened URM Buildings in the Christchurch CBD in the 22 February 2011 Earthquake, Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission of Inquiry, Christchurch, NZ.

18.

Ingham

J. M.

and Griffith

M. C.

2011c. The Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in the 2010/2011 Canterbury Earthquake Swarm, Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission of Inquiry, Christchurch, NZ.

19.

Kam

W. Y.

Pampanin

and Elwood

2011. Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the 22 February Christchurch (Lyttelton) earthquake, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 44, 239–278.

20.

Marshall

J. D.

Jaiswal

Gould

Turner

Lizundia

and Barnes

J. C.

2013. Post-earthquake building safety inspection: Lessons from the Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquakes, Earthquake Spectra 29, 1091–1107.

21.

Pegg

Jr. , and Weisstein

E. W.

2013. Margin of Error, from MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource, available at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MarginofError.html.

22.

Marques

T. A.

2004. Predicting and correcting bias caused by measurement error in line transect sampling using multiplicative error models, Biometrics 60, 757–763.

23.

Moon

L. M.

Biggs

D. T.

Ingham

J. M.

and Griffith

M. C.

2012. The February 2011 Christchurch earthquake: Incorporating transect methodology into rapid damage assessment, in Proceedings of Forensic Engineering 2010, San Francisco, CA.

24.

Moon

Dizhur

Senaldi

Derakhshan

Griffith

M. C.

Magenes

Ingham

J. M.

and Derakhshan

2014. The demise of the URM building stock in Christchurch during the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence, Earthquake Spectra 30, 253–276.

25.

New Zealand Herald, 2011. One in three Christchurch buildings may come down - PM, New Zealand Herald, 2 March 2011, available at http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10709703 (last accessed 9 April 2012).