An Organizational Capability Framework for Earthquake Recovery

Abstract

Engineering and construction capability affects the cost and pace of post-disaster recovery. An organizational capability framework for effective earthquake recovery was developed after studying longitudinally 15 engineering and construction organizations following the 2010/11 earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand. The longitudinal case studies, conducted from 2012 to 2015, revealed insights regarding the multitude of decisions that affected demands for engineering and construction post-earthquake, and thus the capability of organizations to meet demands. The framework presents five major challenges faced by organizations operating in an earthquake recovery environment and three core organizational capabilities required to address these challenges: disaster recovery know-how, organizational adaptive capacity to meet changing demands, and collective support among organizations. The findings offer real experience to help engineering and construction industries anticipate capability challenges and prepare for them as a business, as a sector, and as a partner with government agencies in a disaster management context.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alegre

and Chiva

2013

Linking entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of organizational learning capability and innovation performance

Journal of Small Business Management 51 491–507.

Alimin

I. I.

Raduan

C. R.

Jegak

and Haslmda

2012

The effects of organizational resources, capabilities and systems on competitive advantage

International Business Management 6 176–186.

Allred

C. R.

Fawcett

S. E.

Wallin

and Magnan

G. M.

2011

A dynamic collaboration capability as a source of competitive advantage

Decision Sciences 42 129–161.

Amit

and Schoemaker

P. J. H.

1993

Strategic assets and organizational rent

Strategic Management Journal 14 33–46.

Amsden

A. H.

and Hikino

1994

Project execution capability, organizational know-how and conglomerate corporate growth in late industrialization

Industrial and Corporate Change 3 111–147.

Andrews

Beynon

M. J.

and McDermott

A. M.

2016

Organizational capability in the public sector: A configuration approach

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 239–258.

Bakhru

2007

Creating and developing organisational capabilities - Do we know more than we can say?

International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital 4 174–186.

Barakat

and Zyck

S. A.

2011

Housing reconstruction as socio-economic recovery and state building: evidence from Southern Lebanon

Housing Studies 26 133–154.

Barenstein

J. D.

2008

From Gujarat to Tamil Nadu: Owner-driven vs. contractor-driven housing reconstruction in India

I-Rec 2008 Building Resilience: Achieving Effective Post-Disaster Reconstruction Christchurch, NZ.

10.

Bhattacharya

Gibson

D. E.

and Doty

D. H.

2005

The effects of flexibility in employee skills, employee behaviors, and HR practices on firm performance

Journal of Management 31 622–640.

11.

Boen

2006

Observed reconstruction of houses in Aceh seven months after the Great Sumatra Earthquake and Indian Ocean Tsunami of December 2004

Earthquake Spectra 22 S803–S818.

12.

Bradley

B. A.

Quigley

M. C.

Dissen

R. J. V.

and Litchfield

N. J.

2014

Ground motion and seismic source aspects of the Canterbury earthquake sequence

Earthquake Spectra 30 1–15.

13.

Brown

Seville

and Vargo

2013 The Role of Insurance in Organisational Recovery following the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury Earthquakes Resilient Organisations Research Report 2013/04.

14.

Brunsdon

Hare

and Stannard

2012

The impact of the Canterbury earthquake sequence on the engineering profession in New Zealand

Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2012 Conference, 7–9 December 2012, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

15.

Camps

Oltra

Aldas-Manzano

Buenaventura-Vera

and Torres-Carballo

2016

Individual performance in turbulent environments: The role of organizational learning capability and employee flexibility

Human Resource Management 55 363–383.

16.

Cetindamar

Phaal

and Probert

2009

Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities

Technovation 29 237–246.

17.

Chang-Richards

and Wilkinson

2016 The roles of integrated project management frameworks and the insurance industry in post-disaster reconstruction: Recovery after the 2010 and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes in Rebuilding Asia: Approaches to Post-Disaster Reconstruction in the Asia-Pacific Region ( Daly

and Feener

Eds.), Cambridge University Press.

18.

Chang-Richards

Wilkinson

Potangaroa

and Seville

2013

Resource challenges for housing reconstruction: A longitudinal study of the Australian bushfires

Disaster Prevention and Management 22 172–181.

19.

Chang-Richards

Wilkinson

Seville

and Brunsdon

2014 Resourcing Issues Following Earthquake Disaster Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

20.

Chang

and Wilkinson

2012

Canterbury rebuild - It's a resources issue

BRANZ Build 130 72–73.

21.

Chang

Wilkinson

Potangaroa

and Seville

2010

Resourcing challenges for post-disaster housing reconstruction: A comparative analysis

Building Research and Information 38 247–264.

22.

Chang

Wilkinson

Potangaroa

and Seville

2012

Managing resources in disaster recovery projects

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 19 557–580.

23.

Chang

Wilkinson

and Seville

2012 Resourcing the Canterbury Rebuild: Issues and Outlook Auckland, NZ.

24.

Christchurch City Council (CCC) 2010 Christchurch City Council Earthquake-Prone, Dangerous and Insanitary Buildings Policy, 2010 released on 10 September 2010, Christchurch NZ.

25.

Collis

D. J.

1994

Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities?

Strategic Management Journal 15 143–152.

26.

Coriat

and Weinstein

2002

Organization and institution in the generation of innovations

Research Policy 31 273–290.

27.

Crawford

Langston

and Bajracharya

2012

Building capability for disaster resilience

28th Annual Conference of Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM), September 2012, Edinburgh, Scotland.

28.

Day

G. S.

1994

The capabilities of market-driven organizations

Journal of Marketing 58 37–52.

29.

De Toni

A. F.

De Zan

and Battistella

2016

Organizational capabilities for internal complexity: An exploration in the Coop stores

Business Process Management 22 196–230.

30.

Compliance document for New Zealand Building Code, Clause B1 - Structure. Amendment 10 (Canterbury), 2011

31.

Dosi

Nelson

R. R.

and Winter

S. G.

2000 Introduction: The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities in Dosi

Nelson

R. R.

and Winter

S. G.

(Eds.), The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities 1–22. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

32.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

and Martin

J. A.

2000

Dynamic capabilities: What are they?

Strategic Management Journal 21 1105–1121.

33.

Eisenhart

K. M.

1989

Building theories from case study research

Academy of Management Review 14 532–550.

34.

Elwood

K. J.

Marquis

and Kim

J. H.

2015

Post-earthquake assessment and repairability of RC buildings: Lessons from Canterbury and emerging challenges

10th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Building an Earthquake-Resilient Pacific, 6–8 November 2015, Sydney.

35.

Elwood

K. J.

Pampanin

and Kam

W. Y.

2012

22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake and implications for the design of concrete structures

International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, 1–4 March 2012, Tokyo.

36.

Environment Canterbury Regional Council., 2012 Developing a Land Use Recovery Plan for Greater Christchurch: Issues paper Christchurch, NZ.

37.

Feldman

M. S.

and Pentland

B. T.

2003

Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change

Administrative Science Quarterly 48 94–118.

38.

Figueiredo

P. N.

2002

Does technological learning pay off? Inter-firm differences in technological capability-accumulation paths and operational performance improvement

Research Policy 31 73–94.

39.

Gardiner

Leat

and Sadler-Smith

2001

Learning in organizations: HR implications and considerations

Human Resource Development International 4 391–405.

40.

Gardoni

and Murphy

2010

Gauging the societal impacts of natural disasters using a capability approach

Disasters 34 619–636.

41.

GNS Science. 2011 The Canterbury Earthquake Sequence and Implications for Seismic Design Levels Wellington, NZ.

42.

Gold

A. H.

Malhotra

and Segars

A. H.

2001

Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective

Journal of Management Information System 18 185–214.

43.

Grant

R. M.

1991

The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation

California Management Review 33 114–135.

44.

Grant

R. M.

1996

Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration

Organization Science 7 375–387.

45.

Haas

M. R.

and Hansen

M. T.

2005

When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company

Strategic Management Journal 26 1–24.

46.

Haigh

Amaratunga

and Kerimanginaye

2006

An exploration of the construction industry's role in disaster preparedness, response and recovery

COBRA 2006: The Annual Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors London.

47.

Hall

1992

The strategic analysis of intangible resources

Strategic Management Journal 13 135–144.

48.

Hare

Bull

Brown

Brunsdon

Jury

King

McCahon

Millar

Smith

and Stannard

2012

Canterbury Earthquake Sequence: Detailed engineering evaluation of commercial buildings

15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15 WCEE), 24–28 September 2012, Lisbon, Portugal.

49.

Helfat

C. E.

1997

Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D

Strategic Management Journal 18 339–360.

50.

Helfat

C. E.

and Peteraf

M. A.

2009

Understanding dynamic capabilities: Progress along a developmental path

Strategic Organization 7 91–102.

51.

Henderson

and Cockburn

2000 Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in drug discovery in The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities ( Dosi

Nelson

R. R.

and Winter

S. G.

Eds.), Oxford University Press Oxford, UK.

52.

Johnson

L. A.

and Olshansky

R. B.

2013

The road to recovery: Governing post-disaster reconstruction

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy 14–21.

53.

Ketkar

and Sett

P. K.

2010

Environmental dynamism, human resource flexibility, and firm performance: Analysis of a multi-level causal model

International Journal of Human Resource Management 21 1173–1206.

54.

King

Middleton

Brown

Johnson

and Johal

2014

Insurance: Its role in recovery from the 2010–2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence

Earthquake Spectra 30 475–491.

55.

Kogut

and Zander

1992

Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology

Organization Science 3 383–397.

56.

Krueger

R. A.

and Casey

M. A.

2000 Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd edition) Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA.

57.

Kusumasari

Alam

and Siddiqui

2010

Resource capability for local government in managing disaster

Disaster Prevention and Management 19 438–451.

58.

Lawrance

G. M.

Hopkins

D. C.

Cheong

D. P. H.

and Stannard

M. C.

2014

Review of the Building Code Structural Provisions

Paper presented at the 2014 New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) Conference, 21–23 March 2014, Auckland.

59.

Le Masurier

Wilkinson

Zuo

and Rotimi

2008 Building Resilience by Focusing on Legal and Contractual Frameworks for Disaster Reconstruction Paper presented at the International Workshop on Post-Earthquake Reconstruction and Safe Buildings, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

60.

Leedy

P. D.

and Ormrod

J. E.

2010 Practical Research: Planning and Design, 9th Edition Pearson Education Inc. Merrill, NJ.

61.

Leonard-Barton

D. A.

1995 Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation Harvard Business School Press Boston.

62.

Lindell

M. K.

2013 Recovery and reconstruction after disaster in Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards ( Bobrowsky

P. T.

Ed.), Springer New York.

63.

Lorch

2005 What lessons must be learned from the tsunami. Building Research and Information 33 209–211.

64.

Makadok

2001

Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views on recent creation

Strategic Management Journal 22 387–401.

65.

Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) 2012 A Changing Landscape: Recruitment Challenges Following the Canterbury Earthquakes, Evidence from the Canterbury Employers Survey Labour and Immigration Research Centre Wellington, NZ.

66.

Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) 2013 Guidance: Repairing And Rebuilding Houses Affected by the Canterbury Earthquakes, January 2013 Wellington, NZ.

67.

Mukherji

2010

Post-earthquake housing recovery in Bachhau, India: The homeowner, the renter, and the squatter

Earthquake Spectra 26 1085–1100.

68.

Myburgh

Wilkinson

and Seville

2008 Post-Disaster Reconstruction Research: An Industry Update Resilient Organisations Programme Christchurch, NZ.

69.

Nahapiet

and Ghoshal

1998

Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage

Academy of Management Review 23 242–266.

70.

Nazara

and Resosudarmo

B. P.

2007 Aceh-Nias Reconstruction and Rehabilitation: Progress and Challenges at the End of 2006 Asian Development Bank Institute Tokyo, available at http://hdl.handle.net/11540/3658.

71.

New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) 2011 Building Safety Evaluation Following the Canterbury Earthquakes: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Report to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Building Failure Caused by the Canterbury Earthquakes, September 2011 Wellington, NZ.

72.

Ofori

2002

Construction industry development for disaster prevention and response

I-Rec 2002 International Conference on Post-Disaster Reconstruction: Improving Post-Disaster Reconstruction in Developing Countries Montreal.

73.

Olsen

A. H.

and Porter

K. A.

2011

What we know about demand surge: Brief summary

Natural Hazards Review 12 62–71.

74.

Olsen

A. H.

and Porter

K. A.

2013

Storm surge to demand surge: Exploratory study of hurricanes, labor wages, and material prices

Natural Hazards Review (ASCE) 14 247–257.

75.

Parker

and Steenkamp

2012

The economic impact of the Canterbury earthquakes

Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin 75 13–25.

76.

Piening

E. P.

2013

Dynamic capabilities in public organizations: A literature review and research agenda

Public Management Review 15 209–245.

77.

Prahaland

and Hamel

1990

The core competence of the corporation

Harvard Business Review 68 79–91.

78.

PWC 2011 Valuing the Role of Construction in the NZ Economy: A Report to the Construction Strategy Group available at http://www.constructionstrategygroup.org.nz/downloads/PwC%20Report%20-%20Construction%20Sector%20Analysis%20Final%204%20Oct.pdf.

79.

Rotimi

Masurier

J. L.

and Wilkinson

2006

The regulatory framework for effective post-disaster reconstruction in New Zealand

I-Rec 2006 International Conference on Post-Disaster Reconstruction: Meeting Stakeholder Interests, Florence, Italy.

80.

Schienstock

2009 Organizational Capabilities: Some Reflections on the Concept Retrieved from

81.

Schulze

Brojerdi

and von Krogh

G.W.

2014

Those who know, do. Those who understand, teach. Disseminative capability and knowledge transfer in the automotive industry

Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 79–97.

82.

Sharma

and Vredenburg

1998

Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities

Strategic Management Journal 19 729–753.

83.

Stevenson

Kachali

Whitman

Seville

Vargo

and Wilson

2011

Preliminary observations of the impacts the 22 February Christchurch earthquake on organisations and the economy: A report from the field

Bulletin of the New Zealabd National Society for Earthquake Engineering 44 65–76.

84.

Teece

D. J.

Pisano

and Shuen

1997

Dynamic capabilities and strategic management

Strategic Management Journal 18 509–533.

85.

Teece

D. J.

Pisano

G. P.

and Shuen

1990 Firm Capabilities, Resources and the Concept of Strategy: Four Paradigms of Strategic Management Center for Research in Management, Consortium on Competitiveness & Cooperation University of California at Berkeley.

86.

Townsend

D. M.

and Busenitz

L. W.

2015

Turning water into wine? Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in early-stage capitalization processes

Journal of Business Venturing 30 292–306.

87.

van Ballegooy

Malan

Lacrosse

Jacka

M. E.

Cubrinovski

Bray

J. D.

O'Rourke

T. D.

Crawford

S. A.

and Cowan

2014

Assessment of liquefaction-induced land damage for residential Christchurch

Earthquake Spectra 30 31–55.

88.

Wein

and Rose

2011

Economic resilience lessons from the ShakeOut Earthquake scenario

Earthquake Spectra 27 559–573.

89.

Winter

S. G.

2003

Understanding dynamic capabilities

Strategic Management Journal 24 991–995.

90.

L. Y.

2010

Application of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility

Journal of Business Research 63 27–31.

91.

Yin

1984 Case Study Research California, Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA.

92.

Yin

R. K.

2008 Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Fifth Edition Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA.