Effects of Topographic Position and Geology on Shaking Damage to Residential Wood-Framed Structures during the 2003 San Simeon Earthquake,Western San Luis Obispo County,California
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2010
Effects of Topographic Position and Geology on Shaking Damage to Residential Wood-Framed Structures during the 2003 San Simeon Earthquake,Western San Luis Obispo County,California
A statistical evaluation of shaking damage to wood-framed houses caused by the 2003 M6.5 San Simeon earthquake indicates that both the rate and severity of damage, independent of structure type, are significantly greater on hilltops compared to hill slopes when underlain by Cretaceous or Tertiary sedimentary rocks. This increase in damage is interpreted to be the result of topographic amplification. An increase in the damage rate is found for all structures built on Plio-Pleistocene rocks independent of topographic position, and this is interpreted to be the result of amplified shaking caused by geologic site response. Damage rate and severity to houses built on Tertiary rocks suggest that amplification due to both topographic position and geologic site response may be occurring in these rocks, but effects from other topographic parameters cannot be ruled out. For all geologic and topographic conditions, houses with raised foundations are more frequently damaged than those with slab foundations. However, the severity of damage to houses on raised foundations is only significantly greater for those on hill slopes underlain by Tertiary rocks. Structures with some damage-resistant characteristics experienced greater damage severity on hilltops, suggesting a spectral response to topographic amplification.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AssimakiD., GazetasG., and KauselE., 2005. Effects of local soil conditions on the topographic aggravation of seismic motion: Parametric investigation and recorded field evidence from the 1999 Athens earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.95, 1059–1089.
2.
BardP-Y., 1982. Diffracted waves and displacement field over two-dimensional elevated topographies, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc.71, 731–760.
3.
BardP-Y., and TuckerB. E., 1985. Underground and ridge site effects: a comparison of observation and theory. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.75, 905–922.
4.
BarrowsA. G., IrvineP. J., and TanS. S., 1995. Geologic surface effects triggered by the Northridge earthquake, in WoodsMary C., and SeipleW. Ray, eds., The Northridge, California, Earthquake of 17 January 1994, California Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 116, 65–88.
5.
BooreD. M., 1972. A note on the effect of simple topography on seismic SH waves. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.62, 275–284.
6.
BouchonM., 1973. Effect of topography on surface motion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.63, 615–632.
7.
CelebiM., 1987. Topographical and geological amplifications determined from strong-motion and aftershock records of the 3 March 1985 Chile earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.77, 1147–1167.
8.
DavisL. L., and WestL. R., 1973. Observed effects of topography on ground motion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.63, 283–298.
9.
GeliL., BardP-Y., and JullienB., 1988. The effect of topography on earthquake ground motion: a review and new results. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.78, 42–63.
10.
HarpE. L., and JibsonR. W., 2002. Anomalous concentrations of seismically triggered rock falls in Pacoima Canyon: are they caused by highly susceptible slopes or local amplification of seismic shaking?. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.92, 3180–3189.
11.
HartzellS. H., CarverD. L., and KingK. W., 1994. Initial investigation of site and topographic effects at Robinwood Ridge, California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.84, 1336–1349.
12.
HavenithH-B., JongmansD., FaccioliE., AbdrakhmatovK., BardP-Y., 2002. Site effect analysis around the seismically induced Ananevo Rockslide, Kyrgyzstan. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.92, 3190–3209.
13.
HollanderM., and WolfeD. A., 1999. Non-Parametric Statistical Methods (2nd edition). New York, Wiley.
14.
JennessJ., 2006. Topographic position index (tpi_jen.avx) extension for ArcView 3. x,v.1.3a, Jenness Enterprises. Available at www.jennessent.com/arcview/tpi.htm.
15.
KawaseH., and AkiK., 1990. Topography effect at the critical SV-wave incidence: possible explanation of damage pattern by the Whittier Narrows, California earthquake of 1 October 1987. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.80, 1–22.
16.
McCrinkT. P., 1995. Ridge-top landslides triggered by the Northridge earthquake, in WoodsMary C., and SeipleW. Ray, eds., The Northridge, California, Earthquake of 17 January 1994, California Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 116, 273–278.
17.
MitasovaH., and HofierkaJ., 1993. Interpolation by regularized spline with tension: II. Application to terrain modeling and surface geometry, Mathematical Geology25, 657–669.
18.
NasonR. D., 1971. Shattered Earth at Wallaby Street, Sylmar, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 733, 97–98.
19.
RobinsonC. C., RobinsonR. A., RobinsonS. R., RobinsonD. M., and RobinsonJ. D., 2001. The effect of weathering on shear wave velocities within a bedrock ridge and its possible influence on topographic amplification of surface accelerations during earthquake shaking, Abstract, Geological Society of America, Cordilleran Section, 97th Annual Meeting, and Pacific Section, AAPG, Universal City, CA, April 9–11, 2001.
20.
RolandoneF., DregerD., MurrayM., and BurgmannR., 2006. Coseismic slip distribution of the 2003 Mw 6.6 San Simeon earthquake, California, determined from GPS measurements and seismic waveform data, Geophys. Res. Lett.33, 4 pp.
21.
SchierleG. G., 2003. Northridge Earthquake Field Investigations: Statistical Analysis of Woodframe Damage, Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering (CUREE) Publication No. W-09, 151 pp.
22.
SchmidtJ., and HewittA., 2004, Fuzzy land element classification from DTMs based on geometry and terrain position, Geoderma121, 243–256.
23.
SteinbruggeK. V., and AlgermissenS. T., 1990. Earthquake losses to single-family dwellings: California experience, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1939-A, 65 pp.
24.
SteinbruggeK. V., and RothR. J.Jr., 1994. Dwelling and mobile home monetary losses due to the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake with an emphasis on loss estimation, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1939-B, 72 pp.
25.
TrifunacM. D., and TodorovskaM. I., 1997. Northridge, California, earthquake of 1994: Density of red-tagged buildings versus peak horizontal velocity and intensity of shaking, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.16, 209–222.
26.
TrifunacM. D., and TodorovskaM. I., 1998. Damage distribution during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake relative to generalized categories of surficial geology, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.17, 239–253.
27.
TrifunacM. D., and TodorovskaM. I., 2004. 1971 San Fernando and 1994 Northridge, California, earthquakes: Did the zones with severely damaged buildings reoccur?, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.24, 225–239.
WeberF. H., 1975. Surface effects and related geology of the San Fernando earthquake in the Sylmar area, in San Fernando, California, Earthquake of 9 February 1971 (OakeshottGordon B., editor), California Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 196, 71–96.
30.
WeissA. D., 2001. Topographic position and landforms analysis: Poster presentation, ESRI User Conference, San Diego, CA, (as of October 2009 this poster is available at: www.jennessent.com/arcview/tpi.htm).
31.
WessonR. L., PerkinsD. M., LeyendeckerE. V., RothR. J.Jr. and PetersenM. D., 2004. Losses to single-family housing from ground motions in the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake, Earthquake Spectra20, 1021–1045.
32.
WilkinsonL., 2004. Nonparametric tests, in, SYSTAT 11, Statistics II, Chapter 13, pp II-595–II-620, SYSTAT Software, Inc., Richmond, CA.
33.
WoodJ. D., 1996. The Geomorphological Characterisation of Digital Elevation Models, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leicester, UK, (http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/~jwo/phd/).
34.
WoodJ., 2007. Landserf: visualization and analysis of terrain models (http://www.landserf.org/).
