The 2001 M 6.8 Nisqually, Washington, earthquake was recorded by more than 70 strong motion sites in and around the Puget Sound region. We have characterized the shear-wave velocity (VS) structure down to depths of 100 to 300 ft at the 32 permanent strong motion sites, which recorded the highest ground motions (peak horizontal ground accelerations [PGA] of 0.04 to 0.31 g), using the Spectral-Analysis-of-Surface-Waves (SASW) technique. Most of the surveyed sites are underlain by glacial till (Qvt) with the remaining sites on Holocene alluvium (Qal), glacial recessional (Qvr) and advance outwash deposits (Qva), or manmade fill/modified ground (m). VS30 values for Qvt and Qvr range from 1,266 to 1,769 ft/sec and 1,139 to 1,826 ft/sec, respectively, corresponding to NEHRP site class C. In general, a pattern of higher PGAs with lower VS30 was not observed suggesting that VS30 cannot account for all site effects on the 2001 Nisqually ground motions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonG. M., and BooreD. M., 2003. Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction zone earthquakes and their applications to Cascadia and other regions, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93, 1703–1729.
2.
BakerG. E., and LangstonC. A., 1987. Source parameters of the 1949 magnitude 7.1 south Puget Sound, Washington, earthquake as determined from long-period body waves and strong ground motions, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America77,
1530–1557.
3.
BilderbackE. L., PalmerS. P., FolgerD. S., PoelstraJ. L., MagsinoS. L., and NiggemannR. A., 2004. Shear-wave database for Quaternary and bedrock geologic units, Washington State, Appendix C, unpublished report prepared by Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources.
4.
BoothD. B., WellsR. E., and GivlerR. W., 2004. Chimney damage in the greater Seattle area from the Nisqually earthquake of 28 February 2001, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94, 1143–1158.
5.
CarverD., FrankelA., BiceW., NorrisB., and DickmanN., 2005. Configuration of the Seattle urban seismic array for the February 28, 2001 M 6.8 Nisqually earthquake and its aftershocks, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-344.
6.
CoheeB. R., SomervilleP. G., and AbrahamsonN. A., 1991. Simulated ground motions for hypothesized Mw = 8 subduction earthquakes in Washington and Oregon, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America81, 28–56.
7.
FrankelA., CarverD., CranswickE., MeremonteM., BiceT., and OverturfD., 1999. Site response for Seattle and source parameters of earthquakes in the Puget Sound region, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America89, 468–483.
8.
FrankelA., CarverD., MaloneS., ThomasG., WeaverC., StephensC., PorcellaR., BenzH., FilsonJ., WongI., BiceT., NorrisR., PetersonM., and HarmsenS., 2001. Overview of strong-motion recordings of the M 6.8 Nisqually, Washington, earthquake (abs.), Seismological Research Letters72, 390–391.
9.
FrankelA., CarverD. L., and WilliamsR. A., 2002, Nonlinear and linear site response and basin effects in Seattle from the M 6.8 Nisqually, Washington, earthquake, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92, 2090–2109.
10.
FrankelA. D., and StephensonW. J., 2000, Three-dimensional simulations of ground motions in the Seattle region for earthquakes in the Seattle fault zone, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America90, 1251–1267.
11.
FrankelA. D., StephensonW. J., CarverD. L., WilliamsR. A., OdumJ. K., and RheaS., 2007. Seismic hazard maps for Seattle, Washington, incorporating 3D sedimentary basin effects, nonlinear site response, and rupture directivity, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007–1175.
12.
GoldfingerC., NelsonC. H., JohnsonJ. E., MoreyA. E., Gutiérrez-PastorJ., KarabanovE., ErikssonA. T., GràciaE., DunhillG., PattonJ., EnkinR., DallimoreA., VallierT., and the Shipboard Scientific Parties, 2011. Turbidite Event History: Methods and Implications for Holocene Paleoseismicity of the Cascadia Subduction Zone, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1661-F (in press).
13.
HartzellS., CarverD., CranswickE., and FrankelA., 2000. Variability of site response in Seattle, Washington, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America90, 1237–1250.
14.
HartzellS., LeedsA., FrankelA., WilliamsR. A., OdumJ., StephensonW., and SilvaW., 2002. Simulation of broadband ground motion including nonlinear soil effects for a magnitude 6.5 earthquake on the Seattle fault, Seattle, Washington, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92, 831–853.
15.
IchinoseG. A., ThioH. K., and SomervilleP. G., 2004. Rupture process and near source shaking of the 1965 Seattle-Tacoma and 2001 Nisqually intraslab earthquakes, Geophysical Research Letters31, 10604.
16.
IchinoseG. A., ThioH. K., and SomervilleP. G., 2006. Moment tensor and rupture model for the 1949 Olympia, Washington, earthquake and scaling relations for Cascadia and global intraslab earthquakes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96, 1029–1037.
17.
JohS-H.1996. Advances in Interpretation and Analysis Techniques for Spectral-Analysis-of-Surface-Waves (SASW) Measurements. Ph.D. dissertation, Austin, Texas, The University of Texas at Austin.
18.
LangstonC. A. and BlumD. E., 1977. The April 29, 1965, Puget Sound earthquake and the crustal and upper mantle structure of western Washington, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America67, 693–711.
19.
LudwinR. S., WeaverC. S., and CrossonR. S., 1991. Seismicity of Washington and Oregon, SlemmonsD. B., EngdahlE. R., ZobackM. D., and BlackwellD. D. (eds.), Neotectonics of North America, Geological Society of America Decade Map 1, 77–98.
20.
NosonL. L., QamarA. I., and ThorsenG. W., 1988. Washington State earthquake hazards, Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Information Circular85, 77 pp.
21.
Pacific Northwest Seismograph Network (PNSN) Staff, 2001. Preliminary report of the MW = 6.8 Nisqually, Washington, earthquake of 28 February 2001Seismological Research Letters72, 352–361.
22.
PalmerS. P., BilderbackE. L., PoelstraJ. L., FolgerD. S., MagsinoS. L., and NiggemannR. A., 2004. Introduction to the geotechnical boring data report and shear wave velocity database release, unpublished report prepared by Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources.
23.
PetersenM. D., FrankelA. D., HarmsenS. C., MuellerC. S., HallerK. M., WheelerR. L., WessonR. L., ZengY., BoydO. S., PerkinsD. M., LucoN., FieldE. H., WillsC. J., and RukstalesK. S., 2008. Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1128, 61 pp.
24.
PrattT. L., and BrocherT. M., 2006. Site response and attenuation in the Puget Lowland, Washington State, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96, 536–552.
25.
PrattT. L., BrocherT. M., WeaverC. S., MillerK. C., TréhuA. M., CreagerK. C., and CorssonR. S., 2003. Amplification of seismic waves by the Seattle basin, Washington State, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93, 533–545.
26.
RosenbladB. L., StokoeK. H., RathjeE. M., and DarendeliM. B., 2001. Characterization of strong motion stations shaken by the Kocaeli and Duzce earthquake in Turkey, Geotechnical Engineering Report GR01-1, Geotechnical Engineering Center, University of Texas at Austin.
27.
Shannon & Wilson, Inc. and Agbabian Associates, 1978. Geotechnical and Strong Motion Earthquake Data from U.S. Accelerograph Stations, report for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-0985, 4, 248 pp.
28.
SilvaW. J., WongI. G., and DarraghR. B., 1998. Engineering characterization of earthquake strong ground motions in the Pacific Northwest, RogersA. M., WalshT. J., KockelmanW. J., PriestG. R. (eds), Assessing Earthquake Hazards and Reducing Risk in the Pacific Northwest, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1560(2), 313–324.
29.
SnelsonC. M., BrocherT. M., MillerK. C., PrattT. L., and TréhuA. M., 2007, Seismic amplification within the Seattle Basin, Washington State: Insights from SHIPS seismic tomography experiments, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America97, 1432–1448.
30.
StokoeK. H.II, JohS. H., and WoodsR. D., 2004. Some contributions of in situ geophysical measurements to solving geotechnical engineering problems, Proceedings, International Site Characterization ISC’2 Porto, Portugal.
31.
StokoeK. H.II, RosenbladB. L., BayJ. A.RedpathB., DiehlJ. G., StellerR., WongI. G., ThomasP. A., and LuebbersM., 2003. Comparison of VS profiles from three seismic methods at Yucca Mountain, in Soil and Rock America 2003CulliganP. J., EinsteinH. H., and WhittleA. J. (eds.), Verlag Glückauf GMBH, 1, 299–306.
32.
StokoeK. H.II, WrightS. G., BayJ. A., and RoessetJ. M., 1994. Characterization of geotechnical sites by SASW method, in Technical Report - Geophysical Characterization of Sites, WoodsR. D. (editor), ISSMFE Technical Committee 10: Oxford Publishers, 13th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, New Delhi, India.
33.
TroostK. G., and BoothD. B., 2008. Geology of Seattle and the Seattle area, Washington, in Landslides and Engineering Geology of Seattle, Washington, Area, BaumR. L., GodtJ. W., and HighlandL. M. (eds.), Geological Society of America Review in Engineering Geology XX, 1–35.
34.
WilliamsR. A., StephensonW. J., FrankelA. D., CranswickE., MeremonteM. E., and OdumJ. K., 2000. Correlation of 1- to 10-Hz earthquake resonances with surface measurements of S-wave reflections and refractions in the upper 50 m, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America90, 1323–1331.
35.
WilliamsR. A., StephensonW. J., FrankelA. D., and OdumJ. K., 1999. Surface seismic measurements of near-surface P- and S-wave seismic velocities at earthquake recording stations, Seattle, Washington, Earthquake Spectra15, 565–584.
36.
WilliamsR. A., StephensonW. J., OdumJ. K., and WorleyD. M., 2001. Site response-related shallow P- and S-wave velocity measurements in Seattle and on the Crescent formation near Olympia, Washington (abs.), Seismological Research Letters72, 270.
37.
WongI. G. and SilvaW. J., 1998. Earthquake ground shaking hazards in the Portland and Seattle metropolitan areas, in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III, DakoulasP., YegianM., and HoltzR. D. (eds.), American Society of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Special Publication No. 75, vol. 1, 66–78.
38.
WongI. G. and SilvaW. J., 2006. The importance of in situ shear-wave velocity measurements in developing urban and regional earthquake hazard maps, Proceedings, 19th Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 1304–1315 (CD ROM).
39.
WongI. G., SparksA., MetcalfeR., WrightD. H., KalinskiM. E., StokoeK. H., BrownL. T., and YountJ. C., 1999a. Geologic/geophysical database to characterize site response in the Seattle, Washington metropolitan area (abs.), Seismological Research Letters70, 256.
40.
WongI. G., SparksA., MetcalfeR., WrightD. H., KalinskiM. E., StokoeK. H., BrownL. T., and YountJ. C., 1999b. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and ground shaking microzonation maps for the Seattle, Washington, metropolitan area: Characterization of the near-surface geology (Year 1), Final Technical Report, U.S. Geological Survey Award No. 1434-HQ-97-GR-03024.
41.
WongI., SparksA., ThomasP., and NemserE., 2003. Evaluation of near-surface site amplification in the Seattle, Washington, metropolitan area, Final Technical Report, U.S. Geological Survey Award No. 00HQGR019.
42.
YoungsR. R., ChiouS-J., SilvaW. J., and HumphreyJ. R., 1997. Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes, Seismological Research Letters68, 58–73.
43.
ZhaoJ. X., ZhangJ., AsanoA., OhnoY., OouchiT., TakahashiT., OgawaH., IrikuraK., ThioH. K., SomervilleP. G., and FukushimaY., 2006. Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96, 898–913.
