On Monday, 6 April 2009 at 3:32 a.m. (local time), a moment magnitude 6.3 earthquake with an epicenter located near the city of L'Aquila, in central Italy, killed 308 people, injured 1,500, left 22,000 homeless, and temporarily displaced another 65,000. This study examines a sample of the affected population and finds that despite the long list of historical earthquakes that struck the region and the swarm of foreshocks occurring up to four months before the main shock of 6 April, the residents of L'Aquila had a rather low earthquake risk perception and an unjustified confidence in the seismic safety of their houses. This low perception of earthquake risk and ignorance of the real structural resistance of buildings appear to have inhibited the individual and collective propensity to develop emergency plans. This situation was further exacerbated by the lack of clear and forthright communication from the emergency management authorities about the impossibility of precisely predicting earthquakes and about the risks posed by many of the city's old buildings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderD., 1993. Natural Hazards, University College London Press and Chapman & Hall, London and New York, 632 pp.
2.
AlexanderD., 2009. Mortality and morbidity risk in the L'Aquila, Italy earthquake of 6 April 2009 and lessons to be learned, Second International Workshop on Disaster Casualties, 15–16 June 2009, University of Cambridge, U.K.
3.
AndersonJ. W., 1967. Cultural adaptation to threatened disaster, Human Organization27, 298–307.
4.
AndersonM. J., 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance, Austral Ecology26, 32–46.
5.
AndersonM. J., 2005. PERMANOVA: A FORTRAN Computer Program for Permutational Multivariate Analysis of VarianceDepartment of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
6.
AndersonM. J., and ter BraakC. J. F., 2003. Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation73, 85–113.
7.
AsgaryA., and WillisK. G., 1997. Household behaviour in response to earthquake risk: An assessment of alternative theories, Disasters21, 354–365.
8.
BaghS., ChiaraluceL., De GoriP., MorettiM., GovoniA., ChiarabbaC., Di BartolomeoP., and RomanelliM., 2007. Background seismicity in the Central Apennines of Italy: The Abruzzo region case study, Tectonophysics444, 80–92.
9.
BealC. H., 1915. The Avezzano earthquake of January 13, 1915, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America5, 1–4.
10.
BurtonI., KatesR. W., and WhiteG. F., 1978. The Environment as Hazard, Oxford University Press, New York, 290 pp.
11.
CaporaleR., 1988. Toward a cultural systematic theory of natural disaster: The case of Italian earthquakes of 1968 in Belice; 1976 in Friuli; 1980 in Campania Basilicata, in Proceedings of the U.S.-Italy Conference (QuarantelliE.L. and PelandaCarlo, eds.), Disaster Research Center, Newark, DE.
12.
CaporaleR., and RossiI., 1988. Reconstruction and Socio-Cultural Systems, A Long-Range Study of Reconstruction Processes Following the November 23, 1980 Earthquake in Southern Italy, Institute for Italian-American Studies, New York.
13.
DavisM. S., RicciT., and MitchellL., 2005. Perceptions of risk for volcanic hazards at Vesuvio and Etna, Italy, Australian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies 1 (electronic journal), http://www.massey.ac.nz/∼trauma/issues/2005-1/davis.htm, accessed 2 October 2011.
14.
De MarcoR., MartiniM. G., Di PasqualeG., FralleoneA., and PizzaA. G., 2000. La classificazione e la normativa sismica dal 1909 al 1984, Servizio Sismico Nazionale, Rome.
15.
DooleyD., CatalanoR., MishraS., and SerxnerS., 1992. Earthquake preparedness: Predictors in a community survey, Journal of Applied Social Psychology22, 451–470.
European Commission for Standardisation (CEN), 1998. Eurocode 8 (2004 - 2006), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, UNI-EN 1998, Brussels, Belgium.
19.
FinnisK., JohnstonD., BeckerJ., RonanJ., and PatonD., 2007. School and community-based hazards education and links to disaster resilient communities, Regional Development Dialogue28, 99–1008.
20.
GaladiniF., and MessinaP., 2001. Plio-Quaternary changes of the normal fault architecture in the Central Apennines (Italy), Geodinamica Acta14, 321–344.
21.
Government of Italy, 1927. Norme tecniche ed igieniche per le riparazioni, ricostruzioni e nuove costruzioni degli edifici pubblici e privati nei comuni o frazioni di comune dichiarati zone sismiche, Royal Decree Law, 13 March 1927, No. 431, Gazzetta Ufficiale del Regno d'Italia 82, Rome.
22.
Government of Italy, 1939. Norme per la esecuzione delle opere in conglomerato cementizio semplice e armato, Royal Decree Law, 16 November 1939, No. 2229, Gazzetta Ufficiale del Regno d'ItaliaSO92, Rome.
23.
Government of Italy, 1974. Provvedimenti per le costruzioni con particolari prescrizioni per le zone sismiche, Italian Public Law, 2 February 1974, No. 64, Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana76, Rome.
24.
Government of Italy, 1975. Disposizioni concernenti l'applicazione delle norme tecniche per le costruzioni in zone sismiche, Decree of the Ministry of Public Works, 3 March 1975, No. 40, Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana93, Rome.
25.
Government of Italy, 2003. Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica, Order of the Italian Prime Minister, 20 March 2003, No. 3274, Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana105:SO72, Rome.
26.
Government of Italy, 2006. Criteri generali per l'individuazione delle zone sismiche e per la formazione e l'aggiornamento degli elenchi delle medesime zone, Order of the Italian Prime Minister, 28 April 2006, No. 3519, Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana108, Rome.
27.
Government of Italy, 2009. Conversione in legge, con modificazioni, del decreto-legge 28 aprile 2009, No. 39, Recante interventi urgenti in favore delle popolazioni colpite dagli eventi sismici nella regione Abruzzo nel mese di Aprile 2009 e ulteriori interventi urgenti di protezione civile, Italian Public Law, 24 June 2009, No. 77, Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana147, Rome.
Italian National Institute of Geophysics and Vulcanology (INGV), 2009. Web site, http://www.ingv.it, accessed 2 October 2011.
30.
JóhannesdóttirG., and GísladóttirG., 2010. People living under threat of volcanic hazard in southern Iceland: Vulnerability and risk perception, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.10, 407–420.
31.
JohnstonD. M., BebbingtonM. S., LaiC. D., HoughtonB. F.,and PatonD., 1999. Volcanic hazard perceptions: Comparative shifts in knowledge and risk, Disaster Prevention and Management8, 118–126.
32.
KaplanH., BilginH., YilmazS., BiniciH., and ÖztasA., 2010. Structural damages of L'Aquila (Italy) earthquake, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.10, 499–507.
33.
LindellM., ArlikattiS., and PraterC. S., 2009. Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: Perception of hazard adjustment attributes, Risk Anal.29, 1072–1088.
34.
LindellM., and WhitneyD. J., 2000. Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption, Risk Anal.20, 13–25.
35.
LombardiM., 1995. Communication about major accident hazards: Credibility and perception of qualified informers in an Italian city, Disaster Prevention and Management4, 4–13.
36.
MarincioniF., 2001. A cross-cultural analysis of natural disaster response: The northwest Italy floods of 1994 compared to the US Midwest floods of 1993, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters19, 209–236.
37.
MarincioniF., and AppiottiF., 2009. The Lyon-Turin high-speed rail; The public debate and perception of environmental risk in Susa Valley, Italy, Environmental Management43, 863–875.
38.
McArdleB. H., and AndersonM. J., 2001. Fitting multivariate models to community data: A comment on distance-based redundancy analysis, Ecology82, 290–297.
39.
MelettiC., and StucchiM., 2009. Pericolosità Sismica, Normativa e Zone Sismiche nell'Aquilano, Italian National Institute of Geophysics and Vulcanology (INGV), http://zonesismiche.mi.ingv.it, accessed 2 October 2011.
40.
MiletiD. S., and O'BrienP., 1992. Warnings during disaster: Normalizing communicated risk, Social Problems39, 40–57.
41.
OrtolaniF., PagliucaS., and SpizuocoA., 2009. Sisma dell'Aquila ed effetti locali:dove finisce la natura comincia la mano dell'uomo: Workshop Il terremoto Aquilano dell'Aprile 2009, 4 June 2009, University of Chieti, Italy.
42.
PalmR., 1998. Urban earthquake hazards: The impact of culture on perceived risk and response in the USA and Japan, Applied Geography18, 5–46.
43.
PalmR. I., 1990. Natural Hazards: An Integrative Framework for Research and Planning, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 184 pp.
44.
PatonD., 2003. Disaster preparedness: A social-cognitive perspective, Disaster Prevention and Management12, 210–216.
45.
PatonD., 2007. Preparing for natural hazards: The role of community trust, Disaster Prevention and Management16, 370–379.
46.
PatonD., 2008. Risk communication and natural hazard mitigation: How trust influences its effectiveness, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues8, 2–16.
47.
PatonD., McClureJ., and BürgeltP. T., 2006. Natural hazard resilience: The role of individual and household preparedness, in Disaster Resilience: an Integrated Approach (PatonD. and JohnstonD., eds.) Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL105–127.
48.
PatonD., SmithL., JohnstonD. M., JohnsonM., and RonanK. R., 2003. Responding to earthquake hazards: Promoting household resilience and preparedness, Paper No. 166, 2003 Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 13-15 February, 2003, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ.
49.
PribadiK., AmriC., and RahayuH., 2001. Post earthquake school safety: An experience of UNCRD-ITB school safety in Bengkulu City, International Workshop on Earthquake Safer World in the 21st Century, 29-31 January 2001, Kobe, Japan.
50.
RennO., BurnsW. J., KaspersonJ. X., KaspersonR. E., and SlovicP., 1992. The social amplification of risk: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications, Journal of Social Issues48, 60–137.
51.
RobertsG. P., and MichettiA. M., 2004. Spatial and temporal variations in growth rates along active normal fault systems: An example from the Lazio-Abruzzo Apennines, central Italy, Journal of Structural Geology26, 339–376.
52.
RodríguezH., DiazW., SantosJ., and AguirreB., 2006. Communicating Risk and Uncertainty: Science, Technology, and Disasters at the Crossroads, in The Handbook of Disaster Research (RodriguezH., QuarantelliE. L., and DynesR., eds.) Springer, New York.
53.
RonanK. R., CrellinK., JohnstonD. M., FinnisK., PatonD., and BeckerJ., 2008. Promoting child and family resilience to disasters: Effects, interventions, and prevention effectiveness, Children, Youth and Environments18, 332–353, http://www.colorado.edu/journals/cye.
54.
RonanK. R., JohnstonD. M., DalyM., and FairleyR., 2001. School children's risk perception and preparedness: A hazard education survey, The Australian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies 1 (electronic journal), http://www.massey.ac.nz/~trauma/issues/2001-1/ronan.htm, accessed 2 October 2011.
55.
ShawR., ShiwakuK., KobayashiH., and KobayashiM., 2004. Linking experience, education, perception and earthquake preparedness, Disaster Prevention and Management13, 39–49.
56.
SlovicP., 1987. Perception of risk, Science236, 280–285.
SmithK., and PetleyD. N. (eds.), 2009. Environmental Hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disasters, Routledge, New York, 378 pp.
59.
SpittalM. J., McClureJ., SiegertR. J., and WalkeyF. H., 2005. Optimistic bias in relation to preparedness for earthquakes, Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies 1 (electronic journal), http://www.massey.ac.nz/~trauma/issues/2005-1/spittal.htm, accessed 2 October 2011.
60.
SpittalM. J., McClureJ., SiegertR. J., and WalkeyF. H., 2008. Predictors of two types of earthquake preparation: Survival activities and mitigation activities, Environment and Behavior40, 798–817.
61.
StallingsR. A. (ed), 2002. Methods of Disaster ResearchXlibris Corporation, Philadelphia, PA, 524 pp.
62.
TanakaK., 2005. The impact of disaster education on public preparation and mitigation for earthquakes: A cross-country comparison between Fukui, Japan and the San Francisco Bay Area California, USA, Applied Geography25, 201–225.
63.
TertullianiA., RossiA., CucciL., and VecchiM., 2009. L'Aquila (central Italy) earthquakes: The predecessors of the April 6, 2009 event, Seismological Research Letters80, 1008–1013.
64.
WachtendorfT., and ShengX., 2002. Influence of social demographic characteristics and past earthquake experience on earthquake risk perception, Second Workshop for Comparative Study on Urban Earthquake Disaster Mitigation 14-15 February 2002, Kobe, Japan.
65.
WhiteG. F., 1973. Directions in geography, in Natural Hazard Research (ChorleyR. J., ed.) Mathuen, London331 pp.
66.
ZarrilliL., 2003. The territory's revenge: Geo-cultural reflection on Abruzzo's development model, The Cultural Turn in Geography Conference, 18–20 September 2003, Gorizia, Italy.
