A Rapid Visual Damage Assessment was initiated in the direct aftermath of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake to assess the safety and damage of residential buildings in the areas affected by the earthquake. Over 30,000 paper assessment forms have been subsequently digitized. The collected data set allows comparison of the observed damage to the residential building stock to the damage expected using existing fragility curves. Under certain conditions and respecting certain limitations, the post-earthquake building safety and damage data can be used to update the existing fragility functions for the Nepalese building stock. Recommendations are made for the improvement of post-earthquake building safety assessments in Nepal in order to: (1) make data collection more consistent, (2) increase the accuracy of the collected data, and (3) make more effective use of the collected data after future earthquakes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgostinelliC., and GrecoL., 2013. A weighted strategy to handle likelihood uncertainty in Bayesian inference, Computational Statistics28, 319–339.
2.
Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1989a. ATC-20 Procedures for Postearthquake Safety Evaluation of Buildings, Redwood City, CA.
3.
Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1989b. ATC-20-1 Field Manual: Postearthquake Safety Evaluation of Buildings, Redwood City, CA.
4.
Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1995. ATC-20-2 Addendum to the ATC-20 Postearthquake Building Safety Evaluation Procedures, Redwood City, CA.
5.
Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1996. ATC-20-3 Case Studies in Rapid Postearthquake Safety Evaluation of Buildings, Redwood City, CA.
6.
Applied Technology Council (ATC), 2015. ATC-20-1 Bhutan, Field Manual: Postearthquake Safety Evaluation of Buildings, Redwood City, CA.
7.
BaggioC., BernardiniA., ColozzaR., CorazzaL., Della BellaM., Di PasqualeG., DolceM., GorettiA., MartinelliA., OrsiniG., PapaF., and ZuccaroG., 2007. Field Manual for Post-Earthquake Damage and Safety Assessment and Short Term Countermeasures (AeDES), JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, Luxembourg.
8.
DidierM., BaumbergerS., ToblerR., EspositoS., GhoshS., and StojadinovicB., 2017a. Seismic resilience of the water distribution and the cellular communication systems after the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Journal of Structural Engineering, in press.
9.
DidierM., GrauvoglB., SteentoftA., GhoshS., and StojadinovicB., 2017b. Seismic resilience of the Nepalese power supply system during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, in Proceedings, 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 9–13 January, 2017, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
10.
DidierM., GrauvoglB., SteentoftA., BroccardoM., GhoshS., and StojadinovicB., 2017c. Assessment of post-disaster community infrastructure services demand using Bayesian networks, in Proceedings, 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 9–13 January, 2017Santiago de Chile, Chile.
11.
DixitA. M., RinglerA. T., SumyD. F., CochranE. S., HoughS. E., MartinS. S., GibbonsS., LuetgertJ. H., GaletzkaJ., ShresthaS. N., RajaureS., and McNamaraD. E., 2015. Strong-motion observations of the M 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake sequence and development of the N-SHAKE strong-motion network, Seismological Research Letters86, 1533–1539.
12.
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), 1996. Post-Earthquake Investigation Field Guide – Learning from Earthquakes, Oakland, CA.
13.
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), 2002. EERI Invitational Workshop: An Action Plan to Develop Earthquake Damage and Loss Data Protocols, Pasadena, CA.
14.
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), 2016. EERI Earthquake Reconnaissance Team Report: M7.8 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake on April 25, 2015 and its Aftershocks, Oakland, CA.
GouletJ. A., MichelC., and Der KiureghianA., 2015. Data-driven post-earthquake rapid structural safety assessment, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics44, 549–562.
19.
GuragainJ., 2004. GIS for Seismic Building Loss Estimation: A Case Study from Lalitpur Sub-Metropolitan City Area, Kathmandu, Nepal, Ph.D. Thesis, International Institute for GeoIn-formation Science and Earth Observation, Enschede, the Netherlands.
20.
GuragainR., ShresthaS. N., MaharjanD. K., and PradhanS., 2017. Building damage patterns of non-engineered masonry and reinforced concrete buildings during April 25, 2015 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal, in Proceedings, 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 9–13 January, 2017, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
21.
HuangY., and LiuJ. L., 2017. Seismic performance of hydropower plant and highway system during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal, in Proceedings, 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 9–13 January, 2017, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
22.
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Ministry of Home Affairs, HMG of Nepal, 2002. The Study of Earthquake Disaster Mitigation in the Kathmandu Valley, Kingdom of Nepal, Volumes 1–3.
23.
LekkasE., CarydisP., MavroulisS., SkourtsosE., and TaflambasI., 2017. Initial geological and engineering assessment of the 2015 Nepal, Gorkha M7.8 earthquake and its societal aftermath, in Proceedings, 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 9–13 January, 2017, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
24.
National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal (NSET) and Department of Urban Development & Building Construction (DUDBC), 2009a. Seismic Vulnerability Evaluation Guideline for Private and Public Buildings, Part I: Pre Disaster Vulnerability Assessment, Nepal.
25.
National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal (NSET) and Department of Urban Development & Building Construction (DUDBC), 2009b. Seismic Vulnerability Evaluation Guideline for Private and Public Buildings, Part II: Post Disaster Damage Assessment, Nepal.
26.
Nepal Engineers’ Association (NEA), 2015. A Report on Nepal Earthquake-2072, Pulchowk, Lalitpur, Nepal.
27.
PandeyM. R., TandukarR. P., AvouacJ. P., VergneJ., and HeritierT., 1999. Seismotectonics of the Nepal Himalaya from a local seismic network, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences17, 703–712.
28.
PunjariN. N., GhoshS., and LalaS., 2016. Bayesian approach for the seismic fragility estimation of a containment shell based on the formation of through-wall cracks, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering System, Part A: Civil Engineering2, B4015004.
29.
RaiD. C., SinghalV., Bhushan RajS., and Lalit SagarS., 2017. Performance of masonry and concrete buildings during M7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake of April 25, 2015, in Proceedings, 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 9–13 January, 2017, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
30.
RotaM., PennaA., and StrobbiaC. L., 2008. Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering28, 933–947.
31.
RupakhetyR., OlafssonS., and HalldorssonB., 2017. The 2015 Gorkha earthquake sequence: Strong ground motion features, in Proceedings, 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 9–13 January, 2017, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
32.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and United National Center for Human Settlements (UNCHS), 1994. The Development of Alternative Building Materials and Technologies for Nepal. Appendix C—Seismic Vulnerability Analysis, Nepal.
33.
UpretyP., BhandaryN. P., and YatabeR., 2008. Earthquake hazard in Kathmandu Valley and disaster reduction efforts, in Proceedings, International Conference on Disasters and Development: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice, 23–24 November, 2008, Kathmandu, Nepal.
WaldD. J., EarleP. S., LinK., QuitorianoV., and WordenB. C., 2006. Challenges in rapid ground motion estimation for the prompt assessment of global urban earthquakes, Bulletin of Earthquake Research Institute81, 275–283.
