Procrastination in Online Courses: Performance and Attitudinal Differences

Abstract

This study investigated the relation between dilatory behaviors and performance in students whom we randomly assigned to either an online or a traditional, lecture introductory psychology class. Both sections had full access to a class Web site. There were no reliable differences between the 2 sections of the class on the measures of procrastination, exam performance, or attitudes toward the class. Yet, procrastination was negatively related with exam scores and with attitudes toward the class for the online students, but not for the lecture students. This difference may partially explain why online courses designed to increase the educational efficacy of a course often show no difference in performance when compared to lecture classes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.

Juni

(1995). Review of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. In Conoley

J. C.

Impara

J. C.

(Eds.), The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 863–868). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Lamwers

L. L.

Jazwinski

C. H.

(1989). A comparison of three strategies to reduce student procrastination in PSI. Teaching of Psychology, 16, 8–12.

Leasure

A. R.

Davis

Thievon

S. L.

(2000). Comparison of student outcomes and preferences in a traditional vs. World Wide Web-based baccalaureate nursing research course. Journal of Nursing Education, 39, 149–154.

Loebenstein

A. M.

(1996). The effects of subgoal setting and academic self-efficacy on procrastination. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(02), 1446B. (UMI No. AAT 9619499).

Melton

A. W.

(1970). The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 596–606.

Newman

Scurry

(2001, July 13). Online technology pushes pedagogy to the forefront. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, B7–B10.

Ross

Nisbett

R. E.

(1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Russell

T. L.

(1999). The no significant difference phenomenon: As reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.

10.

Schouwenburg

H. C.

Lay

C. H.

(1995). Trait procrastination and the Big Five factors of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 481–490.

11.

Tice

D. M.

Baumeister

R. F.

(1997). Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychological Science, 8, 454–458.

12.

Tuckman

B.W.

(1998). Using tests as an incentive to motivate procrastinators to study. Journal of Experimental Education, 66, 141–147.

13.

Watson

D. C.

(2001). Procrastination and the five-factor model: A facet level analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 149–158.

14.

Wesp

(1986). Reducing procrastination through required course involvement. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 128–130.

15.

Wilkinson

T. W.

Sherman

T. M.

(1990). Perceptions and actions of distance educators on academic procrastination. American Journal of Distance Education, 4(3), 47–56.