We argue that recent work in connectionist modeling, in particular the parallel constraint satisfaction processes that are central to many of these models, has great importance for understanding issues of both historical and current concern for social psychologists. We first provide a brief description of connectionist modeling, with particular emphasis on parallel constraint satisfaction processes. Second, we examine the tremendous similarities between parallel constraint satisfaction processes and the Gestalt principles that were the foundation for much of modern social psychology. We propose that parallel constraint satisfaction processes provide a computational implementation of the principles of Gestalt psychology that were central to the work of such seminal social psychologists as Asch, Festinger, Heider, and Lewin. Third, we then describe how parallel constraint satisfaction processes have been applied to three areas that were key to the beginnings of modern social psychology and remain central today: impression formation and causal reasoning, cognitive consistency (balance and cognitive dissonance), and goal-directed behavior. We conclude by discussing implications of parallel constraint satisfaction principles for a number of broader issues in social psychology, such as the dynamics of social thought and the integration of social information within the narrow time frame of social interaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R. P. (1968). Psychological implication. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 112–139). Chicago: Rand McNally.
2.
Abelson, R. P. (1983). Whatever became of consistency theory?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 37–54.
3.
Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb,T. M., Rosenberg, M. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (Eds.). (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.
4.
Abelson, R. P., & Rosenberg, M. J. (1958). Symbolic psycho-logic: A model of attitudinal cognition. Behavioral Science, 3, 1–8.
5.
Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton–Mifflin.
6.
Amit, D. J. (1989). Modeling brain function: The world of attractor neural networks. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Anderson, C. A., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037–1049.
8.
Anderson, J. A., Silverstein, J. W., Ritz, S. A., & Jones, R. S. (1977). Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: Some applications of a neural model. Psychological Review, 84, 413–451.
9.
Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85, 249–277.
10.
Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic.
11.
Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Chicago: Rand McNally.
12.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.
13.
Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
14.
Asch, S. E., & Zukier, H. (1984). Thinking about persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1230–1240.
15.
Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16.
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (1991). Connectionism and the mind: An introduction to parallel processing in networks. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
17.
Cantor, N., Mischel, W., & Schwartz, J. (1982). A prototype analysis of psychological situations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 45–77.
18.
Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review, 63, 277–293.
19.
Deutsch, M. (1968). Field theory in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 412–487). Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.
20.
Eiser, J. R. (1994). Attitudes, chaos, and the connectionist mind. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
21.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282.
22.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
23.
Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203–210.
24.
Gabrys, G. (1989). Heider: A simulation of attitude consistency and attitude change. In S. Ohlsson (Ed.), Aspects of cognitive conflict and cognitive change (Tech. Rep. No. KUL–89–04). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
25.
Gilbert, D. T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 189–211). New York: Guilford.
26.
Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality, 54, 733–740.
27.
Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28.
Hamilton, D. L., & Zanna, M. P. (1972). Differential weighting of favorable and unfavorable attributions in impressions of personality. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 204–212.
29.
Hastie, R., Schroeder, C., & Weber, R. (1990). Creating complex social conjunction categories from simple categories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 242–247.
30.
Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358–374.
31.
Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112.
32.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
33.
Henle, M. (1986). 1879 and all that: Essays in the theory and history of psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
Hertz, J., Krogh, A., & Palmer, R. G. (1991). Introduction to the theory of neural computation. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
35.
Hinton, G. E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1986). Learning and relearning in Boltzmann machines. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 282–317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.
36.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295–355.
37.
Holyoak, K. J., & Spellman, B. A. (1993). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 265–315.
38.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 79, 2554–2558.
39.
Hopfield, J. J. (1984). Neurons with graded responses have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 81, 3088–3092.
40.
John, O. P. (1986). How shall a trait be called: A feature analysis of altruism. In A. Angleitner, A. Furnham, & G. Van Heck (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe: Current trends and controversies (pp. 117–140). Berwyn, IL: Swets North America.
41.
Jordan, N. (1968). Cognitive balance as an aspect of Heider's cognitive psychology. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 169–178). Chicago: Rand McNally.
42.
Kashima, Y., & Kerekes, A. R. Z. (1994). A distributed memory model of averaging phenomena in person impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 407–455.
43.
Kemler–Nelson, D. G. (1984). The effect of intention on what concepts are acquired. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 734–759.
44.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
45.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
46.
Köhler, W. (1920). Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe and im stationären Zustand. Braunschweig, Germany: F. Vieweg.
47.
Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.
48.
Krech, D., & Crutchfield, R. S. (1948). Theory and problems of social psychology. New York: McGraw–Hill.
49.
Krull, D. S. (1993). Does the grist change the mill? The effects of perceiver's inferential goal on the process of social inference. Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 340–348.
50.
Kunda, Z., Miller, D. T., & Claire, T. (1990). Combining social concepts: The role of causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 14, 551–577.
51.
Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel constraint satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284–308.
52.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw–Hill.
53.
Lewin, K. (1947a). Frontiers in group dynamics: I. Human Relations, 1, 2–38.
54.
Lewin, K. (1947b). Frontiers in group dynamics: II. Human Relations, 1, 143–153.
55.
Lutz, C. (1988). Unnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to Western theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
Maes, P. (1990). Situated agents can have goals. Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6, 49–70.
57.
Maes, P. (1991). Adaptive action selection. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 108–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
58.
Mannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W. (1991). Routine computing tasks: Planning as understanding. Cognitive Science, 15, 305–342.
59.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1994). The cultural construction of self and emotion: Implications for social behavior. In S. Kitayama & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 133–196). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
60.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
61.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.
62.
Medin, D. L., & Schwanenflugel, P. L. (1981). Linear separability in classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 355–368.
63.
Medin, D. L., & Wattenmaker, W. D. (1987). Category cohesiveness, theories, and cognitive archeology. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 25–62). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
64.
Miikkulainen, R. (1993). Subsymbolic natural language processing: An integrated model of scripts, lexicon, and memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.
65.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
66.
Miller, L. C., Bettencourt, B. A., DeBro, S. C., & Hoffman, V. (1993). Negotiating safer sex: A dynamic interpersonal process. In J. Pryor & G. Reeder (Eds.), The social psychology of HIV infection (pp. 85–123). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
67.
Miller, L. C., & Burns, D. (1992, May). Why didn't you use a condom? On the coherence of gay men's explanations for unsafe sexual practices. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Miami, FL.
68.
Miller, L. C., Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L. (1994). Situations and goals as fundamental constructs in interpersonal communication research. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 162–198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
Miller, L. C., & Read, S. J. (1987). Why am I telling you this? Self-disclosure in a goal-based model of personality. In V. Derlega & J. Berg (Eds.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 35–58). New York: Plenum.
70.
Miller, L. C., & Read, S. J. (1991). On the coherence of mental models of persons and relationships: A knowledge structure approach. In F. Fincham & G. J. O. Fletcher (Eds.), Cognition in close relationships (pp. 69–99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
71.
Minsky, M., & Papert, S. (1969). Perceptrons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and the invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.
73.
Murre, J. M. J. (1992). Learning and categorization in modular neural networks. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
74.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
75.
Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97, 362–376.
76.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242–258.
77.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 521–533.
78.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206.
79.
Read, S. J. (1987). Constructing causal scenarios: A knowledge structure approach to causal reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 288–302.
80.
Read, S. J., & Lincer, H. (1994). Explanatory coherence and dispositional inference: The role of parallel constraint satisfaction processes. Unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
81.
Read, S. J., & Marcus-Newhall, A. R. (1993). Explanatory coherence in social explanations: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 429–447.
82.
Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1989). Inter-personalism: Toward a goal–based theory of persons in relationships. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 413–472). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
83.
Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1993). Rapist or “regular guy”: Explanatory coherence in the construction of mental models of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 526–540.
84.
Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Dissonance and balance in belief systems: The promise of parallel constraint satisfaction processes and connectionist modeling approaches. In R. C. Schank & E. J. Langer (Eds.), Beliefs, reasoning, and decision making: Psycho-logic in honor of Bob Abelson (pp. 209–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
85.
Roseman, I. J., Spindel, J. S., & Jose, P E. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 899–915.
86.
Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attribution processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 880–892.
87.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60–94.
88.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.). (1986a). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.
89.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986b). PDP models and general issues in cognitive science. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 110–146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.
90.
Rumelhart, D. E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J. L., & Hinton, G. E. (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models (pp. 7–57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.
91.
Seiter, J. (1993). A coherence analysis of deception detection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
92.
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086.
93.
Shultz, T. R., & Lepper, M. R. (1992). A constraint satisfaction model of cognitive dissonance phenomena. In The Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 462–467). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
94.
Shultz, T. R., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Cognitive dissonance reduction as constraint satisfaction. Psychological Review, 103, 219–240.
95.
Smolensky, P. (1986). Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundations of harmony theory. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 194–281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
96.
Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). If Saddam is Hitler then who is George Bush? Analogical mapping between systems of social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 913–933.
97.
Spellman, B. A., Ullman, J. B., & Holyoak, K. J. (1993). A coherence model of cognitive consistency. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 147–165.
98.
Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435–467.
99.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
100.
Thagard, P., & Millgram, E. (1995). Inference to the best plan: A coherence theory of decision. In A. Ram & D. B. Leake (Eds.), Goal-driven learning (pp. 439–454). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
101.
Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. J. (1994). Dynamical systems in social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic.
102.
Vallacher, R. R., Nowak, A., & Kaufman, J. (1994). Intrinsic dynamics of social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 20–34.
103.
Wattenmaker, W. D., Dewey, G. I., Murphy, T. D., & Medin, D. L. (1986). Linear separability and context learning: Context, relational properties, and concept naturalness. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 158–194.
104.
Wertheimer, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studienüber das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61, 161–265.
105.
Wierzbicka, A. (1994). Emotion, language, and cultural scripts. In S. Kitayama & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 133–196). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
106.
Wilensky, R. (1983). Planning and understanding: A computational approach to human reasoning. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.
107.
Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1974). Changes in meaning and halo effects in personality impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 829–835.
108.
Zanna, M. P., & Hamilton, D. L. (1977). Further evidence for meaning change in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 224–238.
