Drawing on five years of data, this case study presents an exploration of the influences of social class on one adolescent's language and literacy practices as she moved from high school in an isolated rural community to college in an urban environment. The study draws on several theoretical frameworks, including multiple literacies (Gallego & Hollingsworth, 2000), Gee's (1996) theory of Discourses, and sociocultural conceptions of social class (Anyon, 1981; Fine & Weis, 1998). Although Crystal, the focal informant, was a successful learner by most conventional standards, she experienced considerable struggle to stay in school and to adopt the dominant discourses of postsecondary education. As a rural high school student, she used a variety of language and literacy practices to “pose” as middle class. When she crossed to college, some of these practices served her better than others. Ultimately, she became alienated by college courses that did not acknowledge language competencies related to her status as a working-class person and that did not allow links between her interests in popular culture and her formal assignments. Implications for practice include the following: that secondary literacy teachers make social class a more salient category for inquiry and that college instructors make deliberate attempts to learn about the preferred discourse practices of their students. The study also suggests the importance of “insider” knowledge in studying the influence of social class on literacy and the need for further research examining how learners negotiate workplace discourses after college.
References
1.
AlvermannD. (1999). Vulnerable subjects: Students' literacy perspectives and the cultural politics of interpretive research. In ShanahanT.Rodriguez-BrownF. (Eds.). National Reading Conference Yearbook, 48 (pp. 39–55). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
2.
AlvermannD.CommeyrasM.YoungJ.RandallS.HinsonD. (1997). Interrupting gendered discursive practices in classroom talk about texts: Easy to think about, difficult to do. Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 73–104.
3.
AlvermannD.HagoodM. (2000). Fandom and critical media literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43, 436–446.
4.
AlvermannD.MoonJ.HagoodM. (1999). Popular culture in the classroom. Newark, DE: International Reading Association and National Reading Conference.
5.
AlvermannD.MooreD. (1991). Secondary school reading. In BarrR.KamilM.MosenthalP.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, volume II (pp. 951–983). New York: Longman.
6.
AndersonM.L.CollinsP. H. (1998). Race, class, and gender: An anthology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7.
ApplemanD. (2000). Critical conversations: Teaching literary theory to adolescents. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
AnyonJ. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3–42.
9.
AtwellN. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10.
BakhtinM. (1981). The dialogic imagination. EmersonC.HolquistM. (Eds). Austin: University of Texas Press.
11.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods(2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
BrantlingerE. (1993). The politics of social class in secondary school: Views of affluent and impoverished youth. New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
ChandlerK. (2000). Rethinking the reading-writing workshop: A Stephen King reader and her teacher negotiate boundaries. Reading Research and Instruction, 39, 135–159.
14.
ChristensenL. (1999). Reading, writing, and rising up: Teaching about social justice and the power of the written word. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
15.
CopeB.KalantzisM. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York: Routledge.
16.
DeYoungA.LawrenceB. (1995). On Hoosiers, Yankees, and mountaineers. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 132–35.
17.
DillonD. R.MojeE. B. (1998). Listening to the talk of adolescent girls: Lessons about literacy, school, and life. In AlvermannD.HinchmanK.MooreD.PhelpsS.WaffD. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 193–223). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
DressmanM. (1993). Lionizing lone wolves: The cultural romantics of literacy workshops. Curriculum Inquiry, 23, 245–263.
19.
ElkinsJ.LukeA. (1999). Redefining adolescent literacies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacies, 43, 212–215.
20.
FechoR. (2000). Critical inquiries into language in an urban classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 368–395.
21.
FindersM. J. (1997). Just girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high. New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
FineM.WeisL. (1998). The unknown city: The lives of poor and working-class young adults. Boston: Beacon Press.
23.
GallegoM.HollingsworthS. (2000). What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard. New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
GeeJ. (1989). Two styles of narrative construction and their linguistic and educational implicators. Journal of Education, 171(1), 97–115.
25.
GeeJ. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer.
26.
GeeJ. P. (2000). New people in new worlds: Networks, the new capitalism, and schools. In CopeB.KalantzisM. (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 43–68). New York: Routledge.
27.
GeeJ. P. (2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolecent and Adult Literacy, 44, 714–725.
28.
GeeJ. P.CrawfordV. (1998). Two kinds of teenagers: Language, identity, and social class. In AlvermannD.HinchmanK.MooreD.PhelpsS.WaffD. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 225–245). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
GlaserC. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
30.
GuzzettiB. (2001). Texts and talk: The role of gender in learning physics. In MojeE. B.O'BrienD. G. (Eds.), Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools (pp. 125–146). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
HarklauL. (2001). From high school to college: Student perspectives on literacy practices. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 33–70.
32.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
HemphillL. (1999). Narrative style, social class, and response to poetry. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 275–302.
34.
HinchmanK.ThomasH.Payne-BourcyL.Chandler-OlcottK. (2002). Representing adolescents' literacies: Case studies of three white males. Reading Research & Instruction, 41, 229–246.
35.
HinchmanK.YoungJ. P. (2001). Speaking but not being heard: Two adolescents negotiate classroom talk about text. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 243–268.
36.
HowleyC. (1996). Rural scholars or bright rednecks? Aspirations for a sense of place among rural youth in Appalachia. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12(3), 150–60.
37.
HyndsS. (1997). On the brink: Negotiating life and literature with adolescents. New York: Teachers College Press.
38.
KatzJ. (2000). Geeks: How two lost boys rode the Internet out of Idaho. New York: Broadway.
39.
KnobelM. (1999). Everyday literacies: Students, discourse, and social practice. New York: Peter Lang.
40.
LangstonD. (1998). Tired of playing monopoly? In AndersonM. L.CollinsP. H. (Eds.), Race, class, and gender: An anthology (pp. 126–136). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
41.
LareauA. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60, 73–84.
42.
LewisC. (1998). Literary interpretation as a social act. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42, 168–177.
43.
LincolnY. (1985). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 275–289.
44.
MahiriJ. (1999). Shooting for excellence: African American and youth culture in New Century schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
45.
MilesM.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
MillerG. (1995). The Prentice Hall reader. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
47.
MojeE. (2000). “To be part of the story”: The literacy practices of gangsta adolescents. Teachers College Record, 102, 651–690.
48.
MojeE.DillonD.O'BrienD. (2000). Reexamining roles of learner, text, and context in secondary literacy. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 165–181.
49.
NaylorG. (1995). A word's meaning can often depend on who says it. In MillerG. (Ed.), The Prentice Hall reader (pp. 408–413). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50.
NeilsenL. (1998). Playing for real: Performative texts and adolescent identities. In AlvermannD.HinchmanK.MooreD.PhelpsS.WaffD. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 3–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
New York State Department of Education. (1998). The New York State school report card for school year 1997–98. Retrieved January 5, 2001, from http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/repcrd399/.
52.
NollE. (1998). Experiencing literacy in and out of school: Case studies of two American Indian youths. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 205–232.
Payne-BourcyL. (2001). Multiple literacies on Main Street and the academy: A longitudinal study of two working-class rural adolescents. Unpublished manuscript. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
55.
PhelpsS. (1998). Adolescents and their multiple literacies. In AlvermannD.HinchmanK.MooreD.PhelpsS.WaffD. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 1–2). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56.
RabinowitzP.SmithM. W. (1997). Authorizing readers: Resistance and respect in the teaching of literature. New York: Teachers College Press.
57.
RogersT. (1997). No imagined peaceful place: A story of community, texts, and cultural conversations in one urban high school English class. In RogersT.SoterA. (Eds.), Reading across cultures: Teaching literature in a diverse society (pp. 95–115). New York: Teachers College Press.
58.
RoseM. (1989). Possible lives: The promise of public education in America. New York: Penguin.
59.
RubinL. (1992). Worlds of pain: Life in the working-class family. New York: Basic Books.
60.
RussellD. (1997). Rethinking genre in school: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504–554.
61.
ShakespearE. (1999). What I'd tell a white gal: What my black male students taught me about race and schooling. In FreedmanS.SimonsE. R.KalninJ. S.CasarenoA.TeamsThe M-Class (Eds.), Inside city schools: Investigating literacy in multicultural classrooms (pp. 77–88). New York: Teachers College Press.
StakeR. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
SteinbeckJ. (1965). Of mice and men. New York: Bantam.
65.
StraussA. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
StreetB. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and education. New York: Longman.
67.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
TobinJ. (1998). An American otaku (or a boy's virtual life on the Net). In Sefton-GreenJ. (Ed.), Digital diversions: Youth culture in the age of multimedia (pp. 106–127). London: UCL Press.
69.
WertschJ. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70.
WhitingM. (1999). The university and the white, rural male. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 15, 141–156.
71.
WillisP. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
72.
YoungJ. P. (2000). Boy talk: Critical literacies and masculinities. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 312–337.
