This study examined the effects of a multifaceted, metacognitive vocabulary intervention on the reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of fifth-grade children in one of California's lowest performing Title I schools. Instruction was comprehensive, designed to facilitate encoding of student-selected words, mastery of clarifying strategies, and executive control of strategies that maximize word-learning proficiency. Strong gains in reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement and increased metacognitive skills were documented following the 12-week vocabulary intervention. Comparisons of Title I students' scores and those of students in an above-average-performing school revealed large, significant differences before the intervention and small, nonsignificant differences following the intervention, suggesting a narrowing of the achievement gap.
References
1.
ArmentoB.NashG.SalterC.WixsonK. (1991). America will be. Atlanta: Houghton Mifflin.
2.
BakerS.SimmonsD.Kame'enuiE. (1995). Vocabulary instruction: Synthesis of the research (Technical Report No. 13). Eugene, OR: National Center to Improve the Tools of Education.
3.
BaumannJ. (1997). The inside and outside of teacher research: Reflection on having one foot in both worlds. (Perspectives in Reading Research No. 11). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center.
4.
BaumannJ.EdwardsE.BolandE.OlejnikS.Kame'enuiE. (2003). Vocabulary tricks: Effects of instruction in morphology and context on fifth grade students' ability to derive and infer word meanings. American Education Research Journal, 40, 447–494.
5.
BaumannJ.EdwardsE.FontG.TereshinskiC.Kame'enuiE.OlejnikS. (2002). Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 150–176.
6.
BaumannJ.Kame'enuiE.AshG. (2003). Research on vocabulary instruction: Voltaire redux. In FloodJ.LappD.SquireJ.JensenJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed., pp. 752–785). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
BeckI.McCaslinE.McKeownM. (1980). The rationale and design of a program to teach vocabulary to fourth grade students. (EDRC Publication 1980/25). Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University–-Pittsburgh Learning and Development Center.
8.
BeckI.McKeownM.McCaslinE. (1983). Vocabulary development: All contexts are not created equal. Elementary School Journal, 83, 177–181.
9.
BeckI.McKeownM.OmansonR. (1987). The effects and uses of diverse vocabulary instructional techniques. In CurtisM.McKeownM. (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 147–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
BeckI.PerfettiC.McKeownM. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506–521.
11.
BeckerW. (1977). Teaching reading and language to the disadvantaged—what we have learned from field research. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 518–543.
12.
BiemillerA. (2004). Teaching vocabulary in the primary grades: Vocabulary instruction needed. In BaumannJ.Kame'enuiE. (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (pp. 28–40). New York: Guilford.
13.
BlachowiczC. (1986). Making connections: Alternatives to the vocabulary notebook. Journal of Reading, 29, 643–649.
14.
BlakeM. (1996). Monsters of the deep.Bothell, WA: Wright Group.
15.
BoehmT.MiramontesO.HooneC.McGowanT.McKinney-BrowningM. (2000). Early United States.Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
16.
BrownA. (1985). Teaching students to think as they read: Implications for curriculum reform. American Educational Research Association Task Force on Excellence in Education, (HD-06864): Curriculum Reform. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
17.
BrownA.PalincsarA. (1985). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. (Technical Report No. 334), Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
18.
BrownA.PalincsarA. (1986). Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. (Technical Report No. 1 372). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
19.
CareyS. (1978). The child as a word learner. In HallenM.BresnanJ.MillerG. (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 264–293). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
CarnineD.Kame'enuiE.CoyleG. (1984). Utilization of contextual information in determining the meaning of unfamiliar words. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 199–203.
21.
CatelliL.PadovanoK.CostelloJ. (2000). Action research in the context of a school-university partnership: Its value, problems, and benefits. Educational Action Research, 8, 225–242.
22.
ChallJ. (1983, May). Vocabularies for reading: How large? What kind? Presented at the annual meeting of the International Reading Association, Anaheim, CA.
23.
ChallJ.JacobsV.BaldwinL. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge.New York: Teacher's College Press.
25.
CrossD.ParisS. (1988). Developmental and instructional analysis of children's metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 131–142.
26.
DaleE. (1965). Vocabulary measurement: Techniques and major findings. Elementary English, 42, 895–901.
27.
DaleE.O'RourkeJ. (1981). The living word vocabulary.Chicago: World Book/Childcraft.
28.
DoleJ.BrownK.TrathenW. (1996). The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 62–88.
29.
DoleJ.SloanC.TrathenW. (1995). Teaching vocabulary within the context of literature. Journal of Reading, 38, 452–460.
30.
FryE. (1977). Fry's readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21, 242–252.
31.
FukkinkR.de GlopperK. (1998). Effects of instruction in deriving word meanings from context: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 68, 450–469.
32.
GagneR. (1985). The condition of learning and the theory of instruction (4th ed.). Orlando, FL: Holt.
33.
GambrellL.MorrowL.NeumanS.PressleyM. (1999). Best practices in literacy instruction.New York: Guilford.
HartB.RisleyT. (2003). The early catastrophe. American Educator, 27(1), 4–9.
36.
HutchingsP. (2002). Ethics and aspiration in the scholarship of teaching and learning. In HutchingsP. (Ed.), Ethics of inquiry, issues in the scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. 1–17). Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
37.
JacobsJ.ParisS. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues, definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255–278.
38.
JenkinsJ.MatlockB.SlocumT. (1989). Two approaches to vocabulary instruction: The teaching of individual word meanings and practice in deriving word meaning from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 215–235.
39.
KuhnM.StahlS. (1998). Teaching children to learn word meanings from context: A synthesis and some questions. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 119–138.
40.
LublinerS. (2001). A practical guide to reciprocal teaching.Bothell, WA: Wright Group/McGraw Hill.
41.
LublinerS. (2005). Getting into words: Vocabulary instruction that strengthens comprehension.Baltimore, MA: Brookes.
42.
MadsenS.GouldB. (1994). The teacher's book of lists.Glenview, IL: Good Year Books.
43.
MayerR. (1981). The promise of cognitive psychology.San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
NagyW. (1988). Vocabulary instruction and reading comprehension (Technical Report No. 431). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
46.
NagyW.HermanP.AndersonR. (1985). Learning word meanings from context: How broadly generalizable? (Technical Report No. 347). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
47.
NagyW.AndersonR.HermanP. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237–270.
48.
NagyW.ScottJ. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In KamilM.MosenthalP.PearsonP. D.BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (Vol. III, pp. 269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction.Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
50.
PalincsarA. (1983). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-monitoring activities. (Report No. US-NIE-C-400-76-0116). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
51.
PalincsarA. (1984, April). Reciprocal teaching: Working within the zone of proximal development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
52.
PalincsarA. (1985, April). The unpacking of a multi-component, metacognitive training package. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
53.
PalincsarA. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 2, 73–98.
54.
PalincsarA.BrownA. (1983). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension monitoring activities.Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Health and Human Development.
55.
PalincsarA.BrownA. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
56.
ParisS. (1984). Teaching children to control their reading comprehension skills.Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
57.
ParisS. (1986). Teaching children to guide their reading and learning. In RaphaelT. (Ed.), The context for school-based literacy (pp. 115–130). New York: Random House.
58.
ParisS.JacobsJ. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children's reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55, 2083–2093.
PearsonD.DoleJ. (1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a new conceptualization of instruction. Elementary School Journal, 88, 151–165.
61.
PressleyM. (2003, September). A few things reading educators should know about instructional experiments. Reading Teacher, 57, 64–71.
62.
PressleyD.RossK.LevinJ.GhatalaE. (1984). The role of strategy utility knowledge in children's strategy decision making. Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 491–504.
63.
RosenshineB. (1997, April). The case for explicit, teacher-led cognitive strategy instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
64.
ScottJ.Jamieson-NoelD.AsselinM. (2003). Vocabulary instruction throughout the day in twenty-three Canadian upper-elementary classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 103, 269–286.
65.
ShulmanL. (2002). Foreword. In HutchingsP. (Ed.), Ethics of inquiry, issues in the scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. v–viii). Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
66.
SmithM. (1941). Measurement of the size of general English vocabulary through the elementary grades and high school. Genetic Psychological Monographs, 24, 311–345.
67.
StahlS. (1986). Three principles of effective vocabulary instruction. Journal of Reading, 29, 662–668.
68.
StahlS.FairbanksM. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56, 72–110.
69.
StanovichK. (1986). Matthew Effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.
70.
TomesenM.AarnoutseC. (1998). Effects of a training program in deriving word meanings. Educational Studies, 24(1), 107–128.
71.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
WattsS. (1995). Vocabulary instruction during reading lessons in six classrooms. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 399–424.
73.
WeinsteinC.MayerR. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). New York: Simon & Schuster.
74.
WhiteT.GravesM.SlaterW. (1990). Growth of reading vocabulary in diverse elementary schools: Decoding and word meaning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 281–290.
75.
WhitehurstG. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
76.
ZeichnerK. (2003). Teacher research as professional development for p-12 educators in the USA. Educational Action Research, 11, 301–325.
