A Comprehensive Numerical Stress—Strain Analysis of Laser Beam Butt-Welded Titanium Compared with Austenitic Steel Joints

Abstract

Experimental tests on laser beam butt-welded joints made of commercially pure titanium and Ti—6Al—4V alloy showed a fatigue behaviour quite different from that usually observed in the case of AISI 304 joints connected with the same welding technique. In fact, fatigue failures of titanium joints were observed at the level of the base material but not in the notch region, as have been found for austenitic steel. In order to explain this experimental evidence, very detailed finite element models are developed in this paper. The models reproduce the real cord profiles of Ti—6Al—4V and AISI 304 steel welded joints detected by a high-precision coordinate measuring machine. Furthermore, mechanical properties given as input to the finite element models correspond to the real joint microstructure revealed by micro-hardness tests carried out in the different regions of the specimen. Finally, finite element models reproduce the distribution of porosity detected via microscopic inspection of the fractured surfaces. Interactions of weld geometry, material properties, presence/absence of porosity, and level of applied stress are considered in this study, which includes nine different finite element models of titanium and austenitic steel joints. A relevant complication in the analysis of titanium joints is represented by the small thickness and stress concentration effects.

Numerical results show that the stress field in titanium joints is sensitive to the combined effect of weld seam geometry and presence of welding defects (pores). The latter produces stress concentration much more severe than that caused by the weld cord. Microstructural support length evaluated near the pores of titanium joints is about the same as that computed near the notch of austenitic steel joints (i.e. near 0). Furthermore, the Topper parameter evaluated for the titanium joints in the presence of pores is much smaller than for the stainless steel joints. Microstructure modifications must be accounted for in order to assess correctly the fatigue behaviour of austenitic steel joints.

Keywords

titanium alloys stainless steel welded joints finite element analysis laser beam welding technique stress concentration porosity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Radaj

Sonsino

C. M.

Fricke

Fatigue assessment of welded joints by local approaches, , 2nd extended edition, 2006 (Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge).

Ellyn

Fatigue damage, crack growth and life prediction , 1997 (Springer, Dordrecht).

Casavola

Nobile

Pappalettere

A local strain method for the evaluation of welded joints fatigue resistance: The case of thin main-plates thickness. Fatigue Fracture Engng Mater. Structs , 2005, 28, 759–767.

Casavola

Pappalettere

Discussion on local approaches for the fatigue design of welded joints. Int. J. Fatigue , 2009, 31, 41–49.

Casavola

Pappalettere

Evaluation of fatigue strength of aluminium alloy welded joints by WEL.FA.RE. method: the case of thin main plate thickness. In Proceedings of New trends in fatigue and fracture 5 (NT2F5), Bari, Italy 2005.

Casavola

Pappalettere

Application of WEL.FA.RE. method on aluminium alloy welded joints. In Proceedings of the 2005 SEM Annual Conference and Exposition on Experimental and applied mechanics, Portland, USA, 2005.

Takao

Kusukawa

Low-cycle fatigue behavior of commercially pure titanium. Mater. Sci. Engng A , 1996, 213, 81–85.

Iwata

Matsuoka

Fatigue strength of CP grade 2 titanium fillet welded joint for ship structure. Weld. in the World , 2004, 48, 40–47.

Bergmann

J. P.

Mechanical behavior of overlap joints of titanium. Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining , 2005, 10, 50–60.

10.

Casavola

Tattoli

Pappalettere

Static and fatigue characterization of titanium alloy welded joints. Mechanics Mater. , 2009, 41, 231–243.

11.

Casavola

Pappalettere

Residual stress on titanium alloy welded joints. In Proceedings of the ICEM13 International Conference on Experimental mechanics, experimental analysis of nano and engineering materials and structures (Ed. Gdoutos

E. E.

), 2007 (Springer, Dordrecht).

12.

Casavola

Pappalettere

Residual stresses and fatigue strength of butt welded components. In Proceedings of 2004 SEM International Conference and Exposition on Experimental and applied mechanics, Costa Mesa, USA, 2004.

13.

Casavola

Nobile

Pappalettere

The Welfare method and relaxed welded plates. Revue Internationale d'Ingénierie des Systèmes de Production Mécanique , 2004, 8, 4–10.

14.

ASM International. Mechanical testing and evaluation, , ASM Handbook, Vol.8, 2000 (ASM International, Ohio).

15.

Caiazzo

Curcio

Daurelio

Minutolo

Memola Capece F.

Ti6Al4V sheets lap and butt joints carried out by CO₂ laser: mechanical and morphological characterization. J. Mater. Processing Technol. , 2004, 149, 546–552.

16.

Yunlian

Quan

Liying

Electron beam welding, laser beam welding and tungsten arc welding of titanium sheet. Mater. Sci. Engng , 2000, A280, 177–181.

17.

Hobbacher

A. F.

The new IIW recommendations for fatigue assessment of welded joints and components - a comprehensive code recently updated. Int. J. Fatigue , 2009, 31, 50–58.

18.

Lindgren

L. E.

Numerical modelling of welding. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mechanics Engng , 2006, 195, 6710–6736.

19.

Dong

A structural stress definition and numerical implementation for fatigue analysis of welded joints. Int. J. Fatigue , 2001, 23, 865–876.

20.

ANSYS® Version 11.0, Theory and user's manual , 2007 (ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, Pennsylvania).).

21.

Radaj

Sonsino

C. M.

Flade

Prediction of service fatigue strength of a welded tubular joint on the basis of the notch strain approach. Int. J. Fatigue , 1998, 20, 471–480.

22.

Tovo

Lazzarin

Relationship between local and structural stress in the evaluation of the weld toe stress distribution. Int. J. Fatigue , 1999, 21, 1063–1078.

23.

Hou

C. Y.

Fatigue analysis of welded joints with the aid of real three-dimensional weld toe geometry. Int. J. Fatigue , 2007, 29, 772–785.

24.

Peterson

R. E.

Stress concentration factors , 1974 (John Wiley, New York).

25.

El Haddad

M. H.

Topper

T. H.

Smith

K.N.

Prediction of non-propagating cracks. Engng Fracture Mechanics , 1979, 11, 573–584.

26.

Anderson

T. L.

Fracture mechanics , 2nd edition, 1995 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida).

27.

Ritchie

R. O.

Boyce

B. L.

Campbell

J. P.

Roder

Thompson

A. V.

Milligan

V. V.

, Thresholds for high-cycle fatigue in a turbine engine Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Int. J. Fatigue , 1999, 21, 653–662.

28.

Sheldon

J. W.

Bain

K. R.

Donald

Keith J.

Investigation of the effects of the shed-rate, initial K_max, and geometric constraint on ΔK_th in Ti-6Al-4V at room temperature. Int. J. Fatigue , 1999, 21, 733–741.

29.

Lazzarin

Livieri

Berto

Zappalorto

Local strain energy density and fatigue strength of welded joints under uniaxial and multiaxial loading. Engng Fracture Mechanics , 2008, 75, 1875–1889.

30.

Sih

G. C.

Strain-energy-density factor applied to mixed mode crack problems. Int. J. Fracture , 1974, 10, 305–321.