Slipline field solutions for metal machining with adhesion friction and elastic effects at the chip-tool contact region

Abstract

Slipline field solutions for orthogonal metal machining are presented by considering elastic effects on chip formation and assuming adhesion friction at the chip-tool interface. The slipline fields are constructed following the matrix operational procedure developed by Dewhurst and Collins and by Dewhurst and assuming a linear relation between the angular range of α and β lines within the secondary shear zone. The limits of validity of the proposed solutions are examined using Hill's overstressing criteria. Elastic, plastic, total cutting, and total thrust forces and contact lengths are computed assuming an exponential pressure distribution in the elastic contact region. Results indicate that for any given rake angle and coefficient of friction the machining parameters are not uniquely determined but may have a range of allowable values and this is due to the non-unique nature of the machining process. Rake angle and rake friction are found to be the most important variables that influence cutting forces, cutting ratio, and contact length. The predicted results show excellent agreement with experimental observations, especially at small rake angles.

Keywords

slipline field metal cutting deformation adhesion friction elastic contact

References

Oxley

P. L. B.

Hastings

Minimum work as a possible criterion for determining friction conditions at tool/chip interface in machining. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 1976, 282, 565–584.

Dewhurst

On the non-uniqueness of the machining process. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 1978, 360, 587–610.

Childs

T. H. C.

Elastic effects in metal cutting chip formation. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1980, 22, 457–466.

Shi

Ramlingam

Slip-line solution for orthogonal cutting with a chip breaker and flank wear. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1991, 33 (9), 689–704.

Ernst

Merchant

M. E.

Chip formation, friction and high quality machined surfaces. Trans. Am. Soc. Metals, 1941, 29, 299–378.

Lee

E. H.

Shaffer

B. W.

The theory of plasticity applied to a problem of machining. J. Appl. Mech., 1951, 18, 405–413.

Kudo

Some new slip-line solutions for two dimensional steady state machining. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1965, 7, 43–55.

Childs

T. H. C.

Mahdi

M. I.

On the stress distribution between the chip and tool during metal cutting. Ann. CIRP, 1989, 38 (1), 55–58.

Maity

K. P.

Das

N. S.

A class of slip-line field solutions for metal machining with slipping and sticking contact at the chip-tool interface. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2001, 43, 2435–2452.

10.

Finnie

Shaw

M. C.

Friction process in metal cutting. Trans. ASME, 1956, 78, 1649–1657.

11.

Kobayashi

Thomsen

E. G.

The role of friction in metal cutting. Trans. ASME, J. Engng for Industry, 1960, 82, 324–332.

12.

Thomsen

E. G.

McDonald

A. G.

Kobayashi

Flank friction studies with carbide tools reveal sublayer plastic flow. Trans. ASME, J. Engng for Industry, 1962, 84, 53–64.

13.

Kato

Yamaguchi

Yanda

Stress distribution at the interface between tool and chip in machining. Trans. ASME, J. Engng for Industry, 1972, 94 (5), 683–689.

14.

Barrow

Graham

Kurimoto

Leong

Y. F.

Determination of rake face stress distribution in orthogonal machining. Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res., 1982, 22, 75–85.

15.

Buryta

Sowerby

Yellowley

Stress distribution on the rake face during orthogonal machining. Int. J. Mach. Tools Mf., 1994, 34 (5), 721–739.

16.

Chandrasekharan

Kapoor

D. V.

Photo-elastic analysis of tool-chip interface stresses. Trans. ASME, J. Engng for Industry, 1965, 87, 495–502.

17.

Bagchi

Write

P. K.

Stress analysis in machining with use of sapphire tools. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 1987, 409, 99–113.

18.

Kattwinkel

Untersuchungen an Schneiden Speanender Werkzeuge mit Hiffle der spannungsoptic. Industr. Anzeiger, 1957, 37, 29–33.

19.

Maekawa

Kitagawa

Childs

T. H. C.

Friction characteristics at chip-tool interface in steel machining. In Proceedings of the 23rd Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Leeds, September 1996, 1997, pp. 559–567 (Elsevier, Amsterdam).

20.

Wanheim

Friction at high normal pressures. Wear, 1973, 25, 225–244.

21.

Dewhurst

Collins

I. F.

A matrix method for constructing slipline field solutions to a class of plain strain plasticity problems. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 1973, 7, 357–378.

22.

Dewhurst

The Coulomb friction boundary value problem in plane-strain slipline field theory. In 1st International Conference on Technology of Plasticity (ICTP) Proceedings (Advanced Technology of Plasticity), Tokyo, Japan, 1984, pp. 1085–1090.

23.

Dewhurst

A general matrix operator for linear boundary value problems in slipline field theory. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 1985, 21, 169–182.

24.

Hill

On the limits set by plastic yielding to the intensity of singularities of stress. J. Mechanics and Physics Solids, 1954, 2, 278–285.

25.

Kuester

J. L.

Mize

J. H.

Optimization Techniques with FORTRAN, 1973 (McGraw-Hill, New York).

26.

Dewhurst

The effects of chip breaker constraints on the mechanics of machining process. Ann. CIRP, 1980, 29, 158–189.

27.

Eggleston

D. M.

Herzog

Thomsen

E. G.

Observations on the angle relationships in metal cutting. Trans. ASME B, 1959, 81, 263–279.