Key characteristics management in product lifecycle management: A survey of methodologies and practices

Abstract

Key characteristics (KCs) play a significant role in product lifecycle management (PLM) and in collaborative and global product development. Over the last decade, KCs methodologies and tools have been studied and practiced in several domains of the product lifecycle, and many world-class companies have introduced KCs considerations into their product development practices. However, there has been no systematic survey of KCs techniques, methodologies, and practices in this respect. This paper aims to give a comprehensive survey of KCs methodologies, and practices from the perspective of enterprise integration and PLM. The paper firstly presents a holistic framework of KCs methodologies and practices through the product lifecycle, and summarizes the fundamentals of KCs including their definition and classification, KC flowdown, and the identification and selection of KCs. A review of the KCs methods and practices in the product lifecycle is then presented, particularly in engineering design, manufacturing planning, production and testing as well as information and knowledge management respectively. Finally, the problems and challenges for future research on KCs techniques are discussed.

Keywords

key characteristics product lifecycle management information and knowledge management dimensional management variation management quality management product development

References

Mejía

López

Molia

Experiences in developing collaborative engineering environments: An action research approach. Comput. Ind.200758329–346.

W. D.

Qiu

Z. M.

State-of-the-art technologies and methodologies for collaborative product development systems. Int. J. Prod. Res.200644(13)2525–2559.

CIMdata Inc. Product lifecycle management - empowering the future of business, CIM Data Report2002.

Rangan

R. M.

Rohde

S. M.

Peak

Chadha

Bliznakov

Streamlining product lifecycle processes: A survey of product lifecycle management implementations, directions, and challenges. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. Engng20055(3)227–237.

Motley

Introduction to variability and variation reduction. Defense AT&L2005, May-June53–55.

Cohesia Cooperation. Solution/overview. 2007, available from http://www.cohesia.com/solutionOverview.asp, Last accessed May 2007.

Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. AQS D1–9000: advanced quality system tools, The Boeing Company. 1998.

Aerospace Standard AS9103. Variation management of key characteristics, SAE

Warrendale, PA

2001.

Specialty Engine Components (SEC) L.L.C. Quality assurance procedure: key characteristic designation system2002.

10.

Lee

D. J.

Thornton

A. C.

The identification and use of key characteristics in the product development process. In Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conferences and computers in engineering conference, 18–22 August 1996, Irvine, CA, pp. 1–12.

11.

Rolls-Royce Company. Selection of key characteristics and use of SPC control charts, manual of specifications of RR90002002.

12.

Northrop Grumman Integrated Systems Sector. Supplier process variability reduction program guidelineNorthrop Grumman Corporation2001.

13.

Karr

Manufacturing developing guide, reference ASC Public Affairs Approval #ASC-06–0208, Wright- Patterson Air Force Base2006.

14.

Thornton

A. C.

A mathematical framework for the key characteristic process. Res. Engng Des.199911145–157.

15.

Spur

Krause

F. L.

Management der CAD- technik. 1997 (Carl Hanser VerlagMunich).

16.

Zheng

L. Y.

Chin

K. S.

QFD based optimal process quality planning. Int. J. Adv. Mfg Technol.200526(7–8)831–841.

17.

Zheng

L. Y.

McMahon

C. A.

Maropoulos

P. G.

Wei

Ding

Jamshidi

Key characteristics- driven rough-cut process planning. In Proceeding of the Fourth International Conference on Digital enterprise techniques (DET2007)2007, Bath, UK, 19–21, September, pp. 269–279.

18.

Raytheon Company. Design for Six Sigma cuts costs, boosts customer satisfaction. http://www.raytheon.com/about/r6s/r6s_success/design/page2/ (accessed Jan 2007).

19.

Strickland

Using design for six sigma to achieve lean software development at Raytheon Missile Systems2007, available from http://webapp.poly.asu.edu/, accessed Jan 2007.

20.

Somerton

D. G.

Mlinar

S. E.

What's key? Tool approaches for determining key characteristics. Ann. Qual. Cong. Trans.1996364–369.

21.

Mantripragada

Whitney

D. E.

Datum flow chain: A systematic approach to assembly design and modeling. Res. Engng Des. - Theory, Appl. Concurrent Engng199810(3)150–165.

22.

Whitney

D. E.

The role of key characteristics in the design of mechanical assemblies. Assembly Automat.200626(4)315–322.

23.

Mathieu

Marguet

Integrated design method to improve producibility based on product key characteristics and assembly sequences. Ann. CIRP20015085–88.

24.

Marguet

Method & tools for geometric variation management2000, available from http://adcats.et.byu.edu/conference/2001/Presentations/BenoitMarguet/, accessed March 2008.

25.

Downey

Parkinson

Chase

An Introduction to smart assemblies for robust design. Res. Eng. Des.200314236–246.

26.

Kern

X. P.

Sudjianto

Forecasting manufacturing quality and optimizing product robustness using process capability data. In Proceedings of the 2003 ASME International mechanical engineering congress & exposition, Washington, DC, 16–21 November 2003, pp. 157–165.

27.

Pilling

Key characteristics: The key to a robust product design. Engng Technol.20047/819–20.

28.

Nataraj

Arunachalam

V. P.

Ranganathan

Using risk analysis and Taguchi's method to find optimal conditions of design parameters: A case study. Int. J. Adv. Mfg Technol.200627(5–6)445–454.

29.

Lyu

Lee

Saitou

Optimal subassembly partitioning of space frame structures for in-process dimensional adjustability and stiffness. J. Mech. Des.2006128527–535.

30.

Lee

Saitou

Assembly synthesis with subassembly partitioning for optimal in-process dimensional adjustability. Artif. Intell. Engng Des., Anal. Mfg20072131–43.

31.

Zhao

Bezdecny

Lee

Robinson

Slagle

Coleman

Barnes

Walls

Prediction of assembly variation during early design. In Proceedings of the 2007 ASME International design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference, IDETC/CIE 2007, Las Vegas, NV, 4–7 September 2007, pp. 1–10.

32.

Phoomboplab

Ceglarek

Design synthesis framework for dimensional management in multistage assembly system. Ann. CIRP200756(1), pp. 153–158.

33.

Ong

S. K.

Guo

D. O.

Online design reuse tool for the support of the generation, embodiment and detailed design of products. Int. J. Prod. Res.200442(16)3301–3331.

34.

Ong

S. K.

Guo

D. O.

An online web-based environment for detailed design reuse. Int. J. Adv. Mf Technol.200627462–467.

35.

Best Manufacturing Practices Program (BMP). Producibility system guidelines - the five steps to success; NAVSO P-36871999.

36.

Whitney

D. E.

Mechanical assemblies: their design, manufacture, and role in product development2004, (OUPOxford).

37.

Wang

Ceglarek

Quality-driven sequence planning and line configuration selection for compliant structure assemblies. Ann. CIRP200554(1)31–35.

38.

Chin

K. S.

Zheng

L. Y.

Wei

A hybrid rough-cut process planning for quality. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.200322(9–10)733–743.

39.

Chen

T. J.

Quantitative selection of inspection plans for variation risk management, MSc ThesisMassachusetts Institute of Technology1999.

40.

Chen

T. J.

Thornton

A. C.

Quantitative selection of inspection plans. In Proceedings of the ASME Design theory and methodology conference, Las Vegas, NV, November1999, DETC99/DTM-8759.

41.

Suri

Frey

D. D.

Otto

K. N.

Key inspection characteristics. J. Mech. Des.2001123(4)479–485.

42.

Maropoulos

P. G.

Zhang

Rolt

Integration of measurement planning with aggregate product modelling for spacecraft design and assembly. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture2006220(10)1687–1695.

43.

Maropoulos

P. G.

Zhang

Chapman

Bramall

D. G.

Rogers

B. C.

Key digital enterprise technology methods for large volume metrology and assembly integration. Int. J. Prod. Res.200745(7)1539–1559.

44.

Ceglarek

Shi

Dimensional variation reduction for automotive body assembly. Mfg Rev.19958(2)139–154.

45.

Thornton

A. C.

Variation risk management: focusing quality improvements in product development and production2004 (WileyHoboken, NJ).

46.

Thornton

A. C.

Variation risk management using modeling and simulation. J. Mech. Des.1999121(2)297–304.

47.

Thornton

A. C.

Donnelly

Ertan

More than just robust design: Why product development organization still content with variation and it impacts on quality. Res. Engng Des.200012127–143.

48.

Thornton

A. C.

Quantitative selection of variation reduction plans. J. Mech. Des.2000122(6)185–193.

49.

Ceglarek

Huang

Zhou

Ding

Kumar

Zhou

Time-based competition in multistage manufacturing: Stream-of-variation analysis (SOVA) methodology—Review. Int. J. Flex. Mfg Syst.20041611–44.

50.

Huang

Lin

Bezdecny

Kong

Ceglarek

Stream-of-variation modeling-part I: A generic 3D variation model for rigid body assembly in single station assembly processes. J. Mfg Sci. Engng2007129821–831.

51.

Huang

Lin

Kong

Ceglarek

Stream-of-variation modeling-part II: A generic 3D variation model for rigid body assembly in multiStation assembly processes. J. Mfg Sci. Engng2007129832–842.

52.

Loose

J. P.

Zhou

Ceglarek

Variation source identification in manufacturing processes based on relational measurements of key product characteristics. J. Mfg Sci. Engng20081301–11.

53.

Chakhunashvili

Johansson

P. M.

Bergman

L. S.

Variation mode and effect analysis. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Product quality and integrity2004, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 364–369.

54.

Johansson

P. M.

Chakhunashvili

Barone

Bergman

Variation mode and effect analysis: A practical tool for quality improvement. Qual. Reliab. Engng Int.200622(8)865–876.

55.

Huang

G. Q.

Lee

S. W.

Mak

K. L.

Web-based product and process data modelling in concurrent “Design for X”. Robot. Comput. Integr. Mfg19991553–63.

56.

Rezayat

Knowledge-based product development using XML and KCs. Comput. Aided Des.200032(5–6)299–309.

57.

Balogun

Hawisa

Tannock

Knowledge management for manufacturing: The product and process database. J. Mfg Technol. Mgmt200415(7)575–584.

58.

Hassan

Dantan

J. Y.

Siadat

Information modelling for variation risk management during product and process design. Int. J. Product. Qual. Mgmt20072(2)221–240.

59.

Hellemann

L. M.

Pettit

M. P.

Jackson

C. C.

Web based process capability data collection and reporting system. US Patent US6961732B22005.

60.

Morris

Lean production transition-characteristic lifecycle management and engineering manufacturing readiness levels. Presentation to Lean Aerospace Plenary Session, 25, March 2003.

61.

Pritchett

Closing the loop of the digital thread2005, available from http://web.mit.edu/lmp/Presentations/Pritchett-Lockheed.pdf, accessed Jan 2007.

62.

Metronor Cooperation. AIMS (Advanced Integrated Mathematical System) for your manufacturing program2007, available from http://www.aims-metrology.com/index.html, accessed Jan 2007.

63.

Robert

E. B.

Best practice: F-22 variability reduction2007, available from http://www.bmpcoe.org/bestpractices/intenal/lmtas/lmtas_18.html, accessed Jan 2007.

64.

Sablehaus

Information: key characteristic designation system2007, available from http://www.bmpcoe.org/bestpractices/internal/rmsc/rmsc_75.html, accessed Jan 2007.

65.

Astles

Dimension management2005, available from http://www.3dcs.com/downloads/airbus.pdf, accessed Jan 2007.

66.

Day

787 Dimensional management. Boeing Cooperation2005, available from http://www.lvmc.org.uk//2005, accessed May 2007.

67.

Van Houten

F. J. A. M.

Manufacturing interfaces. Ann. CIRP199241(2)699–715.

68.

ISO 10303–224. Product data representation and exchange: application protocol: mechanical product definition for process planning using machining features, ISO TC 184/SC 42000.

69.

Liggett

J. V.

Dimensional variation management handbook: a guide for quality, designer, and manufacturing engineers1993 (Prentice HallEnglewood cliffs, NJ).

70.

Curtis

M. A.

Dimensional management: a comprehensive introduction2002 (Industrial PressNew York).

71.

Craig

Dimensional management: A necessary process to meet corporate goals for global competition. IEE Colloq. (Digest)19973462/1–2/8.

72.

Muske

Application of dimensional management on 747 fuselage. AIAA-1997–56051997, available from http://www.sae.org/technical/papers/975605, accessed March 2008.

73.

Jeffreys

Leaney

P. G.

Dimensional control as an integral part of next-generation aircraft development. Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture2000214(B9)831–835.

74.

Northroup Grumman. Information: producibility2007, available from http://www.bmpcoe.org/bestpractices/internal/north/north_19.html, accessed May 2007.

75.

Spicknall

M. H.

Kumar

Huang

T. D.

Dimensional management in shipbuilding: A case study from the Northrup Grumman Ship Systems Lightweight Structures Project. J. Ship Prod.200521(4)209–218.

76.

Murman

E. M.

Lean aerospace engineering2007, available from http://www.mit.edu, accessed March 2008.

77.

Wang

Nnaji

B. B.

UL-PML: Constraint-enabled distributed product data model. Int. J. Prod. Res.200442(17)3743–3763.

78.

Denniston

Capability indices and conformance to specification: The motivation for using Cpm. Qual. Engng200618(1)79–88.

79.

Davies

McMahon

C. A.

Multiple viewpoint design modeling through semantic markup. ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Philadephia, PA, 10–13 September 2006.

80.

Havemann

Fellner

D. W.

Seven research challenges of generalized 3D documents. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl.2007, May/June27(3)70–76.

81.

Chryssolouris

Mavrikios

Papakostas

Mourtzis

Michalos

Georgoulias

Digital manufacturing: history, perspectives and outlook. In Proceeding of the Fourth International Conference on Digital enterprise techniques (DET2007), Bath, UK, 19–21 September 2007, pp. 1–12.

82.

Kunzmann

Pfeifer

Schmitt

Schwenke

Weckenmann

Productive metrology - adding value to manufacture. Ann. CIRP200554(2)691–704.