Response of titanium aluminide alloy to abrasive waterjet cutting: Geometrical accuracy and surface integrity issues versus process parameters

Abstract

Due to their low thermal conductivity, high abrasion of cutting edges and a tendency to crack during machining, titanium aluminide (TiAl) alloys are notoriously difficult-to-cut materials when using conventional (e.g. turning, grinding, drilling, milling) cutting operations. Despite their low machinability TiAl alloys find niche application areas in the manufacture of complex shaped components for aerospace gas turbine engines. Abrasive waterjet (AWJ) machining is one of the most promising non-conventional machining processes for difficult-to-cut materials because of the reduced mechanical and thermal damage to workpiece surfaces produced using this technique. However, there is no information about the AWJ machining of TiAl alloys in the open literature. Based on a generic design of an aeroengine component, this paper investigates the response of a TiAl alloy to AWJ cutting process variables to enable generation of high-integrity surfaces. The effects of operating parameters (pump pressure, material removal rate, abrasive flow rate, and stand-off distance) on the output process quality measures have been investigated as follows: geometrical accuracy (kerf straightness); surface roughness homogeneity (measured along cutting direction on the cutting front surface to study the striation formation); workpiece surface integrity (grit embedment and possible recast micro-layers or material pull-out / micro-cracking after cutting). Advanced surface topography and metallurgical (e.g. SEM, EDX) analyses have been carried out to characterize the response of TiAl alloy to various AWJ conditions leading to the fulfilment of quality criteria of a group of targeted aeroengine components. It was found that the AWJ process has a very high capability (e.g. satisfactory geometrical accuracy, surface quality, minimum surface anomies) to cut TiAl alloy despite grit embedment. However, the authors have addressed this problem by plain waterjet cleaning know-how. In addition, a surprising phenomenon (bubble-like ‘TiO₂-based spot’) caused by a strong exothermic reaction was found on the AWJ cut surfaces.

Keywords

titanium aluminide abrasive waterjet cutting process parameters geometrical accuracy surface integrity

References

Ezugwu

E. O.

Wang

Z. M.

, ‘Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review’ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 68 (3) (1997): 262–274.

Kahles

J. F.

Field

Eylon

Froes

F. H.

, ‘Machining of titanium alloys’ J. Met. 37 (4) (1985): 27–35.

Machado

A. R.

Wallbank

, ‘Machining of titanium and its alloys: A review’ Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engng Manuf. 204 (1) (1990): 53–60.

Borradaile

J. B.

Jeal

R. H.

, ‘Mechanical properties of titanium alloys’. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Titanium science and technology, 1, Kyoto, Japan, 19–22 May, 1980, pp. 141–152. (1980).

Hoogstrate

A. M.

van Luttervelt

C. A.

, ‘Opportunities in abrasive water-jet machining’ Ann. CIRP 46 (2) (1997): 697–714.

Kulekci

M. K.

, ‘Processes and apparatus developments in industrial waterjet applications’ Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 42 (12) (2002): 1297–1306.

Kovacevic

Hashish

Mohan

Ramulu

Kim

T. J.

Geskin

E. S.

, ‘State of the art of research and development in abrasive waterjet machining’ Trans. ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Engng 119 (1997): 776–785.

Finnie

, ‘The mechanism of erosion of ductile metals’. In Proceedings of the Third US National Congress on Applied mechanics, 1958, pp. 527–532 (ASME, New York(1958).

Bitter

J. G. A.

, ‘A study of erosion phenomena: Part I’ Wear 6 (1963): 5–21.

10.

Bitter

J. G. A.

, ‘A study of erosion phenomena: Part II’ Wear 6 (1963): 169–190.

11.

Hashish

, ‘A modeling study of metal cutting with abrasive-waterjets’ Trans. ASME. J. Engng Mater. Technol. 106 (1984): 88–100.

12.

Akkurt

Kulekci

M. K.

Seker

Ercan

, ‘Effect of feed rate on surface roughness in abrasive waterjet cutting applications’ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 147 (2004): 389–396.

13.

Momber

A. W.

Kovacevic

, Principles of abrasive water jet machining (London: Springer 1998).

14.

Arola

Ramulu

, ‘A study of kerf characteristics in abrasive water jet machining of graphite/epoxy composite’ Trans. ASME, J. Engng Mater. Technol. 118 (2) (1996): 256–265.

15.

Deam

R. T.

, ‘A correlation for predicting the kerf profile from abrasive water jet cutting’ Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 30 (4) (2006): 337–343.

16.

Paul

Hoogstrate

A. M.

van Luttervelt

C. A.

Kals

H. J. J.

, ‘An experimental investigation of rectangular pocket milling with abrasive water jet’ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 73 (1–3) (1998): 179–188.

17.

Palleda

, ‘A study of taper angles and material removal rates of drilled holes in the abrasive water jet machining process’ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 189 (1–3) (2007): 292–295.

18.

Gudimetla

Wang

Wong

, ‘Kerf formation analysis in the abrasive waterjet cutting of industrial ceramics’ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 128 (1) (2002): 123–129.

19.

Huang

C. Z.

Hou

R. G.

Wang

Feng

Y. X.

, ‘The effect of high pressure abrasive water jet cutting parameters on cutting performance of granite’ Key Engng Mater. 304–305 (2006): 560–564.

20.

Momber

A. W.

Eusch

Kovacevic

, ‘Machining refractory ceramics with abrasive water jets’ J. Mater. Sci. 31 (24) (1996): 6485–6493.

21.

Neusen

K. F.

Alberts

D. G.

Gores

T. J.

Labus

T. J.

, ‘Distribution of mass in a three-phase abrasive waterjet using scanning X-ray densitometry’. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Jet Cutting Technology, 1991, pp. 83–98. (1991).

22.

Hashish

du Plessis

M. P.

, ‘Prediction equations relating high velocity jet cutting performance to standoff distance and multipasses’ J. Engng Ind. 101 (1979): 311–318.

23.

Wang

Wong

W. C. K.

, ‘A study of abrasive waterjet cutting of metallic coated sheet steels’ Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 39 (6) (1999): 855–870.

24.

Hascalik

A.U.

Gürün

, ‘Effect of traverse speed on abrasive waterjet machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy’ Mater. Des.: Int. J. Mater. Engng Appli. 28 (6) (2007): 1953–1957.

25.

Lutjering

Williams

J. C.

, Titanium (New York: Springer—Verlag 2003) Online version available at: http://www.knovel.com/knovel2/Toc.jsp?BookID=1116&VerticalID=0.

26.

Gurappa

, ‘Prediction of titanium alloy component life by developing an oxidation model’ J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 22 (10) (2003): 771–774.

27.

Ohadi

M. M.

Westlake

H. M.

Ansari

A. I.

Whipple

R. L.

, ‘Experimental study of temperature distributions in a tubular workpiece during cutting with an abrasive water jet’. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Transport phenomena in processing, (Ed. Güçerï

S. I.

), Honolulu, Hawaii, 1992, pp. 409–421 (CRC Press).(1992).

28.

Hayato

Noboru

Chuji

Nobuyuki

Hiroaki

Ken'ichi

, ‘Analysis of particle velocity and temperature distribution of struck surface in fine particle peening’ Trans. Jpn Soc. Mech. Engrs—Part C 67 (660) (2003): 2700–2706.

29.

Simpson

, ‘Abrasive particle study in high pressure water jet cutting’ Int. J. Water Jet Technol. 1 (1990): 17–28.

30.

GMA technical data sheet—GMA Waterjet Grade Product Data Sheet.pdf available from http://www.garnetsales.com/default.asp?id=kb&inc=techdata&custID.

31.

Chen

F. L.

Siores

Patel

Momber

A. W.

, ‘Minimising particle contamination at abrasive waterjet machined surface by a nozzle oscillation technique’ Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 42 (2002): 1385–1390.

32.

Patel

K. J.

, ‘Quantitative evaluation of abrasive contamination in ductile material during abrasive water jet machining and minimising with a nozzle head oscillation technique’ Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 44 (10) (2004): 1125–1132.