Metal matrix composites (MMCs) have emerged as an important class of materials, which are increasingly being utilized in recent years. Application of these materials in certain areas is limited due to difficulties in machining. The principal machining parameters that control machinability characteristics are extrinsic parameters (cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut, and type of cutting tools) and intrinsic parameters (particulate size, volume fraction, and type of reinforcement). Different cutting tools used in machining these materials are given in the order of decreasing hardness as PCD, CBN, TiC, Si3N4, Al2O3, and WC. The present review is focused on the influence of cutting parameters, morphology, distribution, and volume fraction of reinforcement on the surface finish, tool life, cutting forces, and chip formation. This review will provide an insight into selecting the optimum machining parameters for machining metal matrix composites.
RohatgiP. K.AsthanaR.DasS.Solidification, structures, and properties of cast metal ceramic particle composites. Int. Metals Rev., 1986, 31, 115–139.
6.
HasimJ.LooneyL.HashmiM. S. J.Particle distribution in cast metal matrix composites — part-I. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2002, 123, 251–257.
7.
ZhouW.XuZ. M.Casting of SiC reinforced metal matrix composites. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 1997, 63, 358–363.
8.
SureshS.MortensenA.NeedlemanA.Fundamentals of metal—matrix composites, 1993 (Butterworth-Heinemann Publications, USA).
9.
MannaA.BhattacharyaB.A study of machinability of Al—SiC—MMC. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2003, 140, 711–716.
10.
CiftciI.TurkerM.SekarU.Evaluation of tool wear when machining SiC-reinforced Al-2014 alloy matrix composites. Mater. Des., 2004, 25, 251–255.
11.
SuganumaK.FujitaT.SuzukiN.NiiharaK.Aluminium composites reinforced with a new aluminium borate whisker. J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1990, 9, 633–635.
12.
ZhangW.Tensile and fatigue response of aluminafiber-reinforced aluminium matrix composite. J. Mater. Sci. Engng, 2003, A341, 9–17.
13.
DavimJ. P.Diamond tool performance in machining MMCs. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2002, 128, 100–105.
14.
SahinY.Preparation and some properties of SiC-reinforced Al alloy composites. Mater. Des., 2003, 24, 671–679.
15.
CiftciI.TurkerM.SekarU.CBN cutting tool wear during machining of particulate reinforced MMCs. Wear, 2004, 257, 1041–1046.
16.
LinJ. T.BhattacharyyaD.LaneC.Machinability of a silicon carbide reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite. Wear, 1995, 181–182, 883–888.
17.
DavimJ. P.Design optimization of cutting parameters for turning metal matrix composites based on orthogonal arrays. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2003, 132, 340–344.
18.
TomacN.TonnessonK.Machining of particulate Al matrix composites. Ann. CIRP.1992, 41 (1), 55–58.
19.
QuigleyQ.MonagohanJ.O'ReillyP.Factors effecting the machinability of the Al/SiC metal matrix composites. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 1994, 43, 21–36.
20.
KarthikeyanR.GanesanG.RamanathanS.PaiB. C.Optimization of machining characteristics of aluminium matrix composites using genetic algorithm - a goal programming approach. In Proceedings of the National Conference on RAMPT-2001, 2001, pp. 481–491.
21.
ArbizuPuertas I.PerezLuis C. J.Surface roughness prediction by factorial design of experiments in turning processes. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2003, 143–144, 390–396.
22.
WangJ.HungC. Z.SongW. G.The effect of tool flank wear on the orthogonal cutting process and its practical implications. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2003, 142, 338–346.
23.
WeinertK.A consideration of tool wear mechanism when machining MMCs. Ann. CIRP, 1993, 42, 95–98.
24.
D'ErricoG. E.CalzavariniR.Turning of metal matrix composites. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2001, 119, 257–260.
25.
HungN. P.BoyeF. Y. C.KhorK. A.PhuaY. S.LeeH. F.Machinability of aluminum alloys reinforced with silicon carbide particulates. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 1996, 56, 966–977.
26.
SahinY.SurG.The effect of Al-2O3, TiN and Ti (C,N) based CVD coating on tool wear in machining metal matrix composites. Surf. Coatings Technol, 2004, 179, 349–355.
27.
QuanY.ZhouZ.Tool wear and its mechanism for cutting SiC particle-reinforced aluminium matrix composites. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2000, 100, 194–199.
28.
QuanY. M.ZhouZ. H.YeB. Y.Cutting process and chip appearance of aluminium matrix composites reinforced by SiC particle. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 1999, 91, 231–235.
29.
El-GallabM.SkladM.Machining of Al-SiCp metal matrix composites. Part I: Tool performance. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 1998, 83, 151–158.
30.
JoshiS. S.RamakrishnanN.RamakrishnanP.Analysis of chip breaking during orthogonal machining of Al/SiCp composites. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 1999, 88, 90–96.
31.
LucchiniE.Lo CastoS.SbaizeroO.The performance of molybdenum toughened alumina cutting tools in turning a partiulate matal matrix composite. J Mater. Sci. Engng A, 2003, A357, 369–375.
32.
CheungC. F.ChanK. C.ToS.LeeW. B.Effect of reinforcement in ultra-precision machining of Al6061/SiC metal matrix composites. Scripta Materialia, 2002, 47, 77–82.
33.
SahinY.KokM.CelikH.Tool wear and surface roughness of Al2O3 particle-reinforced aluminium alloy composites. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2002, 128, 280–291.
34.
LinJ. T.BhattacharyyaD.KecmanV.Multiple regression and neural networks analysis in composites machining. Composites Sci. Technol., 2003, 63, 539–548.
35.
DavimJ. P.ConceicaoA.Optimization of cutting conditions in machining of aluminium matrix composites using a numerical an experimental model. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2001, 112, 78–82.
36.
KulkarniM. S.MaiappanV.Multiple response optimization for improved machined surface quality. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2003, 141, 174–180.
37.
SeahK. W. H.SharmaS. C.GirishB. M.Mechanical properties of as-cast and heat-treated ZA-27/graphite particulate composite. Composites Part A, 1997, 28A, 251–256.
38.
MurakamiR.MatsuiK.Evaluation of mechanical and wear properties of potassium acid titanate whisker-reinforced copper matrix composites formed by hot isostatis pressing. Wear, 1996, 201, 193–198.
39.
SaravananR. A.SurappaM. K.Fabrication and characterization of pure magnesium-30 vol.% SiCp particle composite. Mater. Sci. Engng, 2000, 276, 108–116.
40.
SinghM.MondalD. P.DasguptaR.PrasadB. K.JhaA. K.YegneswaranA. H.Effect of sillimanite particle reinforcement on dry sliding wear behaviour of Al alloy composite. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2003, 19, 303–312.
41.
SharmaS. C.KrishnaM.VizhianP. S.ShashishankarA.Thermal effects on mild wear transition in dry sliding of aluminium 7075 - Short glass fiber composites. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2002, 216(D12), 975–982.
42.
GuoR. Q.RohatgiP. K.Preparation of aluminium-fly ash particulate composite by powder metallurgy technique. J. Mater. Sci., 1997, 32, 3971–3974.
LaneC.FinnM.A comparison of PCD and CVD diamond in milling MMCs. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Advances in production and fabrication of light metals and MMCs, Alta, Canada, August 1992, pp. 230–236.
45.
BrunM. K.LeeM.GorslerF.Wear characteristics of various hard materials for machining SiCp reinforced aluminium alloy. Wear, 1985, 104, 21–29.
46.
LaneC.Using polycrystalline diamond-vaned drills on silicon carbide particulate-reinforced aluminium castings. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced composite materials, The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, UK, 1993.
47.
LaneC.Machinability of Al composites as a function of matrix alloy and heat treatment. In Proceedings of Symposium on Machining of composites materials, Chicago, Illinois, 1992, pp. 3–15.
48.
CornjagerL.TonhessenK.Machinability of fibre-particulate aluminium matrix composites. Ann. CIRP, 1992, 41(1), 63–66.
49.
LaneC.LennoxM.Economics of machining cast MMCs brakes rotors. Duralcan Report, 1994, pp. 1–8.
50.
AndrewsC. J. E.FengHsi-Yung A.LauW. M.Machining of an aluminium/SiC composites using diamond inserts. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2000, 102, 25–29.
51.
HochengH.YenS. B.IshiharaT.YenB. K.Fundamental turning characteristics of a tribology-favoured graphite Al alloy composites. Mater. Sci. Engng, 1997, A28, 883–997.
52.
LaneC.The effect of different reinforcements on PCD tool life for aluminium composite. Duralcan Report, 1995, pp. 1–6.
53.
YangB. H.WangC. C.Machinability of SiCp reinforced Al alloy composite materials. Light Metals, 1993, 43(4), 187–192.
54.
ChenP.MiyakeY.Machining characteristics of SiCw reinforced Al. In Proceedings of the ASM International Conference Workshop on Machinability, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1989, pp. 69–75.
55.
SagaT.IkedaS.Machinability of Al2O3-SiC short fibre-reinforced Al alloy composites. J. Jap. Int. Light Metals, 1991, 41(4), 264–269.
56.
El-GallabM.SkladM.Machining of Al/SiCp metal matrix composites. Part II. Workpiece integrity. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 1998, 83, 277–283.
57.
RisboodK. A.DixitU. S.SahasrabudhaA. D.Prediction of surface roughness and dimensional desertion by measuring cutting forces and vibration in turning process. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2003, 132, 203–214.
58.
ChundhuryI. A.El-BaradieM. A.Surface roughness prediction in the turning of high-strength steel by factorial design of experiments. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 1997, 67, 55–61.
59.
ChanK.C.CheungC. F.RameshM. V.LeeW. B.ToS.A theoretical and experimental investigation of surface generation in diamond turning of an Al6061/SiCp metal matrix composite. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2001, 43, 2047–2068.
60.
RameshM. V.LeeW. B.CheungC. F.ChanK. C.A parametric analysis of cutting forces in single-point diamond turning of Al6061/SiCp metal matrix composites (MMCs). Mater. Mfg Processes, 2001, 16(1), 61–78.
61.
CheungC. F.ChanK. C.LeeW. B.A power spectrum analysis of surface generation in ultraprecision machining of Al/SiC metal matrix composites. Mater. Mfg Processes, 2003, 18(6), 929–942.
62.
JoshiS. S.RamakrishnanN.NagarwallaH. E.RamakrishnanP.Wear of rotary carbide tools in machining of Al/SiCp composites. Wear, 1999, 230, 124–132.
63.
LooneyL. A.MonaghanJ. M.O'ReillyP.TaplinD. M. R.The turning of an Al/SiC metal composite. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 1992, 33, 453–468.
64.
LiX.SeahW. K. H.Tool wear acceleration in relation to work piece reinforcement percentage in cutting of metal matrix composites. Wear, 2001, 247, 161–171.
65.
LaneC.The effect of different reinforcements on PCD tool life for aluminium composites. In Proceedings of the Machining of Composites Materials Symposium, Chicago, Illinois, November 1992, pp. 17–27.
66.
ChambersA. R.The machinability of light alloy MMCs. Composites: Part A, 1996, 27A, 143–147.
67.
LinC. B.HungY. W.LiuW.-C.KangS.-W.Machining and fluidity of 356Al/SiCp composites. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2001, 110, 152–159.
68.
WallenP.JacobsonS.HogmarkS.An experimental method for studies of intermittent cutting at small cutting depths. Int. J. Mach. Tools Mfg, 1988, 28, 539–550.
69.
HungN. P.BoeyF. Y. C.KhorK. A.OhC. A.LeeH. F.Machinability of cast and powder formed aluminium alloys reinforced with SiC particles. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 1995, 48(1–4), 291–297.
70.
HungN. P.YeoS. H.LeeK. K.NgK. J.Chip formation in machining particle-reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater. Mfg Processes, 1998, 13(1), 85–100.
71.
MannaA.BhattacharyyaB.Investigation for effective tooling system to machine Al/SiC-MMC. In Proceedings of the RAMPT-2001, India, 2001, pp. 465–472.
72.
MannaA.BhattacharyyaB.A study on different tooling systems during machining of Al/SiC-MMC. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2002, 123(3), 476–482.
73.
TosunG.MuratogluM.The drilling of an Al/SiCp metal-matrix composites. Part I: Microstructure. Composites Sci. Technol., 2004, 64, 299–308.
74.
TosunG.MuratogluM.The drilling of an Al/SiCp metal-matrix composites. Part II: Surface integrity. Composites Sci. Technol., 2004, 64, 299–308.
75.
DavimJ. P.BaptistaMonteiro A.Cutting force, tool wear and surface finish in drilling metal matrix composites. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part E: J. Process Mechanical Engineering, 2001, 215(E2), 177–183.
76.
ZhongZ. W.HungN. P.Diamond turning and grinding of aluminium-based metal matrix composites. Mater. Mfg Processes, 2000, 15(6), 853–865.
77.
DavimJ. P.BaptistaA. M.Relationship between cutting force and PCD cutting tool wear in machining silicon carbide reinforced aluminium. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2000, 132(3), 417–423.
78.
DavimJ. P.Turning particulate metal matrix composites: Experimental study of the evolution of the cutting forces, tool wear and workpiece surface roughness with the cutting time. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture, 2001, 215(B3), 371–376.
79.
El-GallabM.SkladM.Machining of Al/SiC particulate metal matrix composites. Part III: Comprehensive tool wear models. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2000, 101(1–3), 10–20.
80.
RameshM. V.ChanK. C.LeeW. B.Finite-element analysis of diamond turning of aluminium matrix composites. Composites Sci. Technol., 2001, 61(10), 1449–1456.
81.
LiuC. S.ZhaoB.GaoG. F.Research on the characteristics of the cutting force in the vibration cutting of a particle-reinforced metal matrix composites SiCp/Al. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2002, 129(1–3), 96–199.
82.
KarthikeyanR.GanesanG.NagarazanR. S.PaiB. C.A critical study on machining of Al/SiCp composites. Mater. Mfg Processes, 2001, 16(1), 47–60.
83.
SongmeneV.BalazinskiM.Machinability of graphitic metal matrix composites as a function of reinforcing particles, Ann. CIRP, 1999, 48 (1), 77–82.
84.
BellJ. A. E.StephensonT. F.WanerA. E. M.SongmeneV.Physical properties of graphitic silicon carbide aluminium metal matrix composite. SAE paper 970788, 1997.
85.
MubarakiB.BandyopadhyayS.FowleR.MathewP.Drilling studies of an Al2O3 metal matrix composite. Part I: Drill wear characteristics. J. Mater. Sci., 1995, 30, 6273–6280.
