The creation of new products that satisfy both the needs of customers and of the company is widely acknowledged as an important contributor to a firm's ongoing success. In principle, the design process, as part of the wider new product development (NPD) process, should result in products that are ‘well designed’, but what does a well-designed product look like? This paper presents a tool to enable a design team to evaluate their products against a range of criteria, with a view to targeting design improvements. This ‘product audit’ tool is based on literature and has been iteratively developed using a mixed research approach, including detailed exploratory cases and application in action research mode. Previous assessment tools have tackled a narrow set of product issues, such as usability. This tool addresses the ‘whole product’ and captures aspects of product design in a concise and usable form. The product audit does not seek to be a benchmarking tool. Aspects such as novelty, desirability, usability, and producibility are expanded as simple checklists, to enable perceptions towards product characteristics to be assessed. This novel assessment tool encourages greater consideration of design issues within the wider context of NPD. By focusing attention on the tangible output of the design process ’ the product ’ practitioners are better able to understand the way in which design decisions influence product usability, desirability, and producibility. Case evidence confirms both the value and originality of this tool.
MoultrieJ.FraserP.ClarksonP. J.The innovation-styling spectrum: A framework for the valuation of industrial design involvement in new product introduction. Proceedings of the 9th International Product Development Management Conference, Ecoles de Mines, Sophia Antipolis, 27–28 May 2002.
5.
KotlerP.RathG. A.Design: A powerful but neglected strategic tool. J. Business Strategy, 1984, 5(2), 16.
6.
HuangX.SoutarG. N.BrownA.New product development processes in small and medium sized enterprises: Some Australian evidence. J. Small Business Mgmt, 2002, 40(1), 27–42.
7.
BruceM.CooperR.VazquezD.Effective design management for small businesses. Des. Stud., 1999, 20(3), 297.
NormanD. A.The design of everyday things, 1998 (MIT Press, Massachusetts).
10.
WheelwrightS.ClarkK.Creating product plans to focus product development. Harv. Business Rev. 1992, March-April, 70–82.
11.
CooperR. G.Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch, 2nd Edition, 1993 (Perseus Books).
12.
McGrathM. E. (Ed.) Setting the PACE in product development: A guide to product and cycle-time excellence, 1996 (Butterworth-Heinemann).
13.
ErnstH.Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature. Int. J. Mgmt. Rev., 2002, 4(1), 1–40.
14.
CooperR. G.How new product strategies impact on performance. J. Prod. Innovation Mgmt, 1984, 1(1), 5.
15.
PageA. L.Assessing new product development practices and performance: Establishing crucial norms. J. Prod. Innovation Mgmt, 1993, 10(4), 273.
16.
UtterbackJ.AllenT.HollomonJ.SirbuM.The process of innovation in five industries in Europe and Japan. IEEE Trans. Engng Mgmt, 1976, 23(1), 3.
17.
EckertC. M.ClarksonP. J.StaceyM. K.The spiral of applied design research: A methodological view on integrated design research. In Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, 2003.
18.
SwannC.Action research and the practice of design. Des. Issues, 2002, 18(2), 49–61.
19.
BlessingL.ChakrabartiA.WallaceK.A design research methodology. In Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design, Praha, 22–24 August 1995.
20.
PlattsK.A process approach to researching manufacturing strategy. Int. J. Ops Mgmt, 1993, 13(8), 4–17.
21.
CanezL.Industrial make or buy decisions: Developing a framework and practical process. PhD Thesis, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, 2000.
22.
NeelyA.‘Production/operations management: Research process and content during the 1980s’. Int. J. Ops Mgmt, 1993, 13(1), 5–18.
23.
BoozAllenHamiltonManagement of new products, 1968 (Booz Allen and Hamilton, New York).
24.
BalbontinA.YazdaniB.CooperR.SouderW.New product development success factors in American and British firms. Int. J. Technol Mgmt, 1999, 17(3), 259.
25.
MishraS.DongwookK.DaeH. L.Factors affecting new product success: Cross country comparisons. J. Prod. Innovation Mgmt, 1999, 13(6), 530–550.
26.
LorenzC.Harnessing design as a strategic resource. Long Range Planning, 1994, 27(5), 73–84.
27.
NixonB.Evaluating design performance. Int. J. Technol. Mgmt, 1999, 17(7), 814.
28.
RutterB. G.AgneJ. A. W.A Darwinian theory of good design. Des Mgmt J., 1998, Autumn.
29.
KotlerP.ArmstrongG.SaundersJ.WongV.Principles of marketing: The European edition, 1996 (Prentice Hall, UK).
30.
PughS.Creating innovative products using total design: The living legacy of Stuart Pugh, 1996 (Addison-Wesley Publishing, USA).
31.
WalshV.The designer as ‘gatekeeper’ in manufacturing industry. Des. Stud., 1985, 6(3), 127.
32.
HarkinsJ.Is design doing its job?Machine Des., 1994, February, 53.
33.
GardinerP.RothwellR.Tough customers, good designs. Des. Stud., 1985, 6(1), 7.
34.
MonöR.Design for product understanding, 1st Edition, 1997 (Liber, Stockholm).
35.
BlochP. H.Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. J. Marketing, 1995, 59, 16–29.
GobeM.The 10 best and 10 worst industrial designs, Ind. Des., 1993, June, 22.
38.
FlurscheimC. H.Industrial design in engineering, 1983 (The Design Council, London).
39.
BrusebergA.McDonagh-PhilipD.Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: A review based on current literature and designers' feedback. Appl. Ergonomics: Hum. Factors in Technol. and Society, 2002, 31(1), 27–38.
40.
PorterM. E.Competitive advantage - creating and sustaining superior performance, 1985 (The Free Press, New York).
41.
TruemanM.‘Demystifying innovation by design’. In Proceedings of the 7th International Forum on Technology management, Kyoto, Japan, 3–7 November 1997.
42.
BruceM.The design process and the ‘crisis’ in the UK information industry. Des. Stud., 1985, 6(1), 34.
43.
TarasewichP.Design for success. Ind. Mgmt, 1996, March/April, 28–32.
44.
HorensteinM.Design concepts for engineers, 1999 (Prentice Hall, USA).
45.
MarchA.Usability: The new dimensions. Harvard Business Rev., 1994, September-October.
46.
JordanP. W.Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human factors, 2000, (Taylor and Francis, London).
47.
CrillyN.MoultrieJ.ClarksonP. J.Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Des. Stud., 2004, 25(66), 547–577.
48.
BrallaJ.Design for manufacturability handbook, 2nd Edition, 1998 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
49.
GalsworthG.Smart simple design-using variety effectiveness to reduce total cost and maximise customer selection, 1994 (Oliver Wright Publications, USA).
50.
MeyerM. H.LehnardA. P.The power of product platforms - building value and cost leadership, 1997 (The Free Press, New York).
51.
CaganJ.VogelC. M.Creating breakthrough products: Innovation from product planning to program approval, 2002 (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).
52.
LittleA. D.The Arthur D Little survey on the product innovation process, 1991 (Arthur D. Little, Massachusetts).
53.
UlrichK. T.EppingerS. D.Product design and development, 2000 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
54.
MeyerM. H.UtterbackJ. M.The product family and the dynamics of core capability. Sloan Mgmt Rev., 1993, 34(3), 29.
55.
DalgleishG. F.JaredG. E. M.SwiftK. G.Design for assembly: Influencing the design process. J. Engng Des., 2000, 11(1), 17–29.
56.
HermannJ. W.CooperJ.GuptaS. K.HayesC. C.IshiiK.KazmerD.SandbornP. A.WoodW. H.New directions in design for manufacturing. In Proceedings of ASME 2004 Design and Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DECT'04, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 28 September-2 October 2004.
57.
CutherellD.Product architecture, the PDMA handbook of new product development, 1996, pp. 217–235.
58.
BaldwinC. Y.ClarkK. B.Managing in an age of modularity. Harv. Business Rev., 1997, 75(5), 84–93 (John Wiley & Sons).
59.
OttoK.WoodK.Product design: Techniques in reverse engineering and new product development, 2001 (Prentice Hall, USA).
60.
NussbaumB.Smart design. Business Week, 1988, 1 April.
61.
FrijdaN. H.The emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction, 1986, 6(2), 4–13 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
62.
DesmetP.A multilayered model of product emotions. The Des. J., 2003, in press.
63.
CoatesD.Watches tell more than time: Product design information and the quest for elegance, 2003 (McGraw-Hill, London).
64.
DittmarH.The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be, 1992 (St Martin's Press, New York).
65.
PepperS. C.MunroT.Encyclopaedia Britannica/Macropaedia, 15th Edition, 1977 (Encyclopaedia Britannica Corporation).
66.
CrozierW. R.Manufactured pleasures: Psychological response to design, 1994 (Manchester University Press, Manchester).
67.
CupchikG. C.Emotion and industrial design: Reconciling meanings and feelings. In Proceedings of First International Conference on Design and emotion, Delft, The Netherlands, 1999, pp. 75–82.
68.
BaxterM.Product design: A practical guide to systematic methods of new product development, 1995 (Chapman and Hall, London).
69.
VeryzerR. W. J.Aesthetic response and the influence of design principles on product preferences. Adv. Consumer Res., 1993, 20, 224–231.
ArnheimR. But Is it science? In Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology, and philosophy. (Ed. CupchikG. C.LászlóJ.) 1992 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
72.
ElamK.Geometry of design: Studies in proportion and composition, 2001 (Princeton Architectural Press, New York).
73.
IttenJ.Design and form: The basic course at the Bauhaus, Revised Edition, 1997 (Thames and Hudson, London).
74.
LewalskiZ. M.Product esthetics: An interpretation for designers, 1988 (Design and Development Engineering Press, Carson City, Nevada).
75.
BerlyneD. E.Studies in the new experimental aesthetics, 1974 (Hemisphere Publishing, Washington).
76.
GombrichE. H.The sense of order: A study in the psychology of decorative art, 2nd Edition, 1984 (Phaidon, Oxford).
77.
HekkertP.SneldersD.WieringenP. C. W.Most advanced, yet acceptable: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. Br. J. Psychol., 2003, 94, 111–124.
78.
JanlertL.-E.The character of things. Des. Stud., 1997, 18, 297–314.
79.
OrnsteinR. E.The evolution of consciousness: Of Darwin, Freud and cranial fire: The origins of the way we think, 1992 (Touchstone, New York).
MayallM. H.Principles in design, 1979 (Design Council, London).
82.
GoffmanE.The presentation of self in everyday life, 1990 (Penguin).
83.
MullerW.Order and meaning in design, 2001 (LEMMA Publishers, Utrecht, Holland).
84.
PheasantS.Bodyspace: Anthropometry ergonomics and the design of work, 2001 (Taylor and Francis, London).
85.
RoebuckJ. A.Anthropometric methods: Designing to fit the human body, monographs in human factors and ergonomics, 1995 (Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).
86.
HennermannR. L.Design for usability: Process skills and tools. Information-Knowledge-Systems Mgmt, 1999, 1, 133.
87.
TilleyA. R.The measure of man and woman: Human factors in deign, Revised Edition, 2002 (Wiley, New York).
88.
KrippendorffK.On the essential contexts of artefacts or on the proposition that design is making sense (of things). Des. Issues, 1989, 5(2), 9–38.
89.
DjajadiningratJ. P.GaverW. W.FrensJ. W.Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: Methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. In Proceedings of conference in Designing interactive systems, DIS'00, ACM, New York, 2000.
90.
KeatesS.ClarksonP J. In Countering design exclusion: An introduction to inclusive design, 2003 (Springer-Verlag, London).
91.
LilienG.YoonE.Determinants of new industrial product performance: A strategic re-examination of the empirical literature. IEE Trans. Engng Mgmt, 1989, 36(1), 3.
92.
CooperR. G.From experience: The invisible success factors in product innovation. J. Prod. Innovation Mgmt, 1999, 16, 115–133.
93.
LazoH.Finding a key to success in new product failures. Ind. Marketing, 1965, 50, November, 74.
94.
ParkK. S.LimC. H.A structured methodology for comparative evaluation of user interface designs using usability criteria and measures. Int. J. Ind. Ergonomics, 1999, 23, 379–389.
95.
BevanN.KirakowskiJ.MaisselJ.What is usability? In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Human computer interaction, Stuttgart, Germany, September 1991.
96.
HanS. H.YunM. H.KimK-J.KwahkJ.Evaluation of product usability: Development and validation of usability dimensions and design elements based on empirical models. Int. J. Ind. Ergonomics, 2000, 26, 477.
97.
NielsenJ.Usability engineering, 1993 (A P Professional, New York).
98.
HsuS. H.ChuangM. C.ChangC. C. A.Semantic differential study of designers' and users' product form perception. Int. J. Ind Ergonomics, 2000, 25, 375–391.
99.
OsgoodC. E.Focus on meaning, 1976 (Moulton, The Hague).
100.
BrownK.SchmiedH.TarondeauJ-C.Success factors in R&D: A meta analysis of the empirical literature and derived implications for design management. Des Mgmt J, Academic Rev., 2002, 2.
101.
BarclayI.The new product development process: Past evidence and future practical application part 1. R&D Mgmt, 1992, 22(3), 255.
102.
KarlssonC.AhlstromP.The difficult path to lean product development. J. Prod. Innovation Mgmt, 1996, 13, 283–295.
103.
Montoya-WeissM.CalantoneR.Determinants of new product performance. J. Prod. Innovation Mgmt, 1994, 11, 397.
