Analysis and characterization of the behaviour of a variable geometry structure

Abstract

The study about a variable geometry truss is presented. The first step is a kinematic design and later an analysis using the MSC/Adams code. Then, the finite-element method with the MSC/Nastran code was used to develop a variable mathematical model to characterize its mechanical behaviour. An explanation is given of the solution selected to analyse the most complex joints. A series of measurements were carried out using different experimental techniques. The aim of photogrammetry tests is to study clearance effect in the joints. On the other hand, measurements of the stiffness were carried out to introduce these data in the finite-element model and thus characterize the accurate position of the structure.

Keywords

variable geometry truss finite element joints clearances measurement behaviour

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Miura

Furuya

Adaptive structure concept for future space applications. AIAA J., 1988, 26(8), 995–1002.

Haftka

R. T.

Adelman

H. M.

Selection of actuator locations for static shape control of large space structures by heuristic integer programming. Comput. Struct., 1985, 20, 575–582.

Miki

Koita

Parallel computing for analysis of variable geometry trusses. AIAA J., 1996, 34(7), 1468–1473.

Agirrebeitia

Avilés

de Bustos

I. F.

Ajuria

A method for the study of position in highly redundant multibody systems in environments with obstacles. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., 2002, 18(2), 257–262.

Zhang

J. Y.

Ohsaki

Stability conditions for tensegrity structures. Int. J. Solids Struct., 2007, 44 (11–12), 3875–3886.

Gruber

Häuplik

Imhof

Azdemir

Waclavicek

Perino

M. A.

Deployable structures for a human lunar base. Acta Astronaut., 2007, 61(1–6), 484–495.

Benjeddou

Topping

B. H. V.

Mota Soares

C. A.

Composite adaptive structures: Modelling and simulation. Comput. Struct., 2006, 84(22–23), 1381–1383.

Chen

G.-S.

Wada

B.-K.

Adaptive truss manipulator space crane concept. J. Spacecr. Rockets, 1993, 30(1), 111–115.

Williams

R. L.

II Hexter

R. E.

Maximizing kinematic motion of a 3-dofVGT module. J. Mech. Des., 1998, 120(2), 333–336.

10.

Chen

W.-J.

Luo

Y.-Z.

G.-Y.

Gong

J.-H.

Dong

S.-L.

A study on space masts based on octahedral truss family. Int. J. Space Struct., 2001, 16(1), 75–82.

11.

L. J.

Tian

G.Y.

Duan

Yang

S. X.

Inverse kinematic analysis for triple-octahedron variable-geometry truss manipulators. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science, 2001, 215(C2), 247–251.

12.

Dhingra

A. K.

Lee

B. H.

Optimal placement of actuators in actively controlled structures. Eng. Optim., 1994, 23, 99–118.

13.

Ramachandran

Nagarajan

Prasad

N. S.

A finite element approach to the design and dynamic analysis of platform type robot manipulators. Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 1992, 10, 335–350.

14.

Law

S. S.

Chan

T. H. T.

Super-element with semi-rigid joints in model updating. J. Sound Vibr., 2001, 239(1), 19–39.

15.

Monaghan

D. J.

Doherty

I. W.

McCourt

Armstrong

C. G.

Coupling 1D beams to 3D bodies. In Proceedings of 7th International Meshing Roundtable, Sandia National Laboratories, Dearborn, Michigan, 1998, pp. 1–8.

16.

Ting

Zhu

Watkins

The effects of joint clearance on position and orientation deviation of linkages and manipulators. Mech. Mach. Theory, 2000, 35(3), 391–401.

17.

Zhu

Ting

Uncertainty analysis of planar and spatial robots with joint clearances. Mech. Mach. Theory, 2000, 35(9), 1239–1256.

18.

Gonzalez

Cibrian

Pino

Soler

González

Displacement measurement in structural elements by optical techniques. Opt. Lasers Eng., 2000, 34, 75–85.

19.

Angulo

Macareno

L. M.

López

Analysis of the effect of clearances in the kinematics of adaptive structures. IASME Trans., 2004, 1(1), 36–42.