Electromagnetic compatibility performance of large area flexible printed circuit automotive harness

Abstract

Electrical interconnection is increasingly important to the functionality of modern vehicles. At the same time the drive within the industry to reduce costs and improve fuel efficiency requires the reduction of the weight of vehicles wherever possible. It is in this context that the possibility of using large-area flexible printed circuits (FPCs) in place of wiring harnesses is receiving strong interest from manufacturers. An FPC harness offers a substantial weight reduction over wire, improved reliability and quality control, and enhanced functionality. Since good electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) design and performance is necessary for the safe and proper functioning of a vehicle, it is important to know if the EMC performance of a vehicle is likely to be compromised by the incorporation of an FPC harness. This question is addressed in this work by comparing the performance of wire and FPC structures in a standard EMC test. The cost implications of anti-interference measures for mass production of FPC harnesses are also assessed. It is found that relatively cheap and simple to implement track structures can significantly reduce the amount of coupling to a large-area FPC automotive harness from an external electromagnetic field.

Keywords

wire harness large-area flexible printed circuit FPC electromagnetic compatibility EMC RFI twisted pair

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Astler

New connections for automobiles, Automot. Eng. Int., 2001, 109, 77–80.

Cottrill

M. C. W.

Jaggernauth

W. A.

Webb

D. P.

Palmer

P. J.

Conway

P. P.

West

A. A.

Foresight vehicle: Large area flexible circuits for automotive applications manufacturing technology-a review of process options. In Proceedings of the Society of Automotive Engineers World Congress and Exposition, Detroit, USA, 2002, SAE Paper No. 2002-01-1127.

Jaggernauth

W. A.

Webb

D. P.

Cottrill

M. C. W.

Palmer

P. J.

Conway

P. P.

West

A. A.

Foresight vehicle: Specification and acceptability criteria for copper-clad dielectric materials used in large automotive flexible printed circuits. In Proceedings of the Society of Automotive Engineers World Congress and Exposition, Detroit, USA, 2002, SAE Paper No. 2002-01-1129.

Webb

D. P.

Cottrill

M. C. W.

Jaggernauth

W. A.

West

A. A.

Palmer

P. J.

Conway

P. P.

Foresight vehicle: Physical media for automotive multiplex networks implemented on large area flexible printed circuit boards. In Proceedings of the Society of Automotive Engineers World Congress and Exposition, Detroit, USA, 2002, SAE Paper No. 2002-01-1130.

Kroskinsque

P. R.

Tokunaga

Design for electromagnetic compatibility and vehicle safety. In SAE Brazil 95, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1995, SAE Paper No. 952258.

Jennings

Ball

Lever

Using statistics to reduce the uncertainty in system level susceptibility testing. In IEEE 1995 International Symposium on

EMC, Atlanta, USA, 1995, pp. 47–50 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ).

Smith

W. T.

Paul

C. R.

Savage

J. S.

Das

S. K.

Crosstalk modeling for automotive harnesses. In IEEE 1994 International Symposium on

EMC, Chicago, USA, 1994, pp. 447–452 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ).

Sibley

Designing without interference

Prof. Eng., 1997, 10 (31).

Bauer

Automotive electric/electronic systems, 2nd edn, 1994, Bosch, Stuttgart.

10.

SAE Standard SAE J1113/1: Electromagnetic compatibility measurement procedures and limit for vehicle components (except aircraft) (60 Hz to 18 GHz). July 1995 (SAE, Warrendale, PA).

11.

Kimberley

Increasing complexity

Automot. Eng., April 2000, 54–65.

12.

SAE information report SAE J2056/3: Selection of transmission media. SAE June 1991 (SAE, Warrendale, PA).

13.

McLaughlin

R. T.

The immunity to RF interference of a CAN system. In IEE Colloquium on

The Integrity of Automotive Electronic Systems, 1993, pp. 4/1–4/8 (IEE, London).

14.

Paul

C. R.

Introduction to electromagnetic compatibility, 1992, Wiley Interscience, New York.

15.

Williams

EMC for product designers, 2nd edn, 1992, Newnes, Oxford.

16.

Dombrowski

J. J.

Davis

D. E.

Gonzalez

A. M.

Lobb

K. T.

Twisted lead pairs on PCB to improve common mode rejection, United States Patent 5,424,490, 1995 (US Patent and Trade Mark Office, Alexandria, VA).

17.

Hwang

R. H.

Printed circuit board for reducing radio frequency interferences, United States Patent 5,357,051, 1994 (US Patent and Trade Mark Office, Alexandria, VA).

18.

Jackson

J. M.

Twisted pair backplane, United States Patent 5,036,160, 1991 (US Patent and Trade Mark Office, Alexandria, VA).

19.

Muyshondt

J. E.

Parker

Wilkie

B. J.

Printed circuit board with an integrated twisted pair conductor, United States Patent 5,646,368, 1997 (US Patent and Trade Mark Office, Alexandria, VA).

20.

Takashima

Printed circuit having twisted conductor lines printed thereon, United States Patent 5,039,824, 1991 (US Patent and Trade Mark Office, Alexandria, VA).

21.

SAE Standard SAE J1113/25: Electromagnetic compatibility measurement procedure for vehicle components—immunity to radiated electromagnetic fields, 10 kHz to 500 MHz-tri-plate line method. September 1996 (SAE, Warrendale, PA).

22.

IPC-TM-650 2.5.15: Guidelines and test methods for RFI-EMI shielding of flat cable, 1986 (IPC, Northbrook, IL).

23.

CISPR 16-1: 1999. Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods-Part 1: Radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus, 1999 (IEC, Geneva).