Application of the multidisciplinary design optimization algorithm to the design of a belt-integrated seat while considering crashworthiness

Abstract

Multidisciplinary design optimization based on independent subspaces (MDOIS), which is a multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) algorithm, has been recently proposed. Since MDOIS is relatively simple compared with other MDO algorithms, it is easy to apply MDOIS to practical engineering problems. In this research, an MDO problem is defined for the design of a belt-integrated seat (BIS) while considering crashworthiness. The crash model consists of an airbag, a BIS, an energy-absorbing steering system, and a safety belt. It is found that the current design problem has two disciplines - structural non-linear analysis and occupant analysis. The interdisciplinary relationship between the disciplines is identified. Interdisciplinary variables between the two disciplines are stiffness of the seat back frame and the belt load. The interdisciplinary relationship is addressed in the system analysis step in MDOIS. Prior to each independent subspace design, values of interdisciplinary variables at a given design point are determined in the system analysis step. The determined values are passed to corresponding subspaces, and the subspaces treat the received values of the interdisciplinary variables as constant parameters throughout the subspace design. For the present example, the belt load is passed to the structural analysis subspace and the stiffness of the seat back frame is passed to the occupant analysis subspace. Determined design variables in each subspace are passed to the system analysis step. In this way, the design process iterates until the convergence criterion is satisfied. As a result of the design, the weight of the BIS and the head injury criterion (HIC) of an occupant are reduced while the specified constraints are satisfied. Since the system analysis cannot be formulated in an explicit form in the current example, an optimization problem is formulated to solve the system analysis. The results from MDOIS are discussed.

Keywords

belt integrated seat (BIS)crashworthiness multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO)multidisciplinary design optimization based on independent subspace (MDOIS)seat belt

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sobieszczanski-Sobieski

A linear decomposition method for large optimization problems - blueprint for development, NASA TM 83248, 1982.

Cramer

E. J.

Dennis

J. E.

Jr Frank

P. D.

Lewis

R. M.

Shubin

G. R.

Problem formulation for multidisciplinary optimization. Centre for Research on Parallel Computation, Rice University, 1993, Report CRPC-TR93334.

Hulme

K. F.

Bloebaum

C. L.

A comparison of solution strategy for simulation-based multi-disciplinary design optimization In Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 38th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 1997, AIAA-97–4977.

Sobieszczanski-Sobieski

Optimization by decomposition: a step from hierarchic to non hierarchic systems. In

Recent advances in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, 1988, NASA CP-3031.

Sellar

Batill

Concurrent subspace optimization using gradient-enhanced neural network approximations. In Proceedings of 6th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on

Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 1994, AIAA-94–4019.

Bloebaum

C. L.

Hajela

Sobieszczanski-Sobieski

Non-hierarchic system decomposition in structural optimization

Engng Optimization, 1992, 19, 171–186.

Sellar

R. S.

Stelmack

Batill

S. M.

Renaud

J. E.

Response surface approximations for discipline coordination in multidisciplinary design optimization In Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 37th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 1996, AIAA-96–1383.

Tappeta

R. V.

Nagendra

Renaud

J. E.

Multidisciplinary design optimization approach for high temperature aircraft engine components

Struct. Optimization, 1999, 18, 134–145.

Sobieszczanski-Sobieski

Haftka

R. T.

Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments In Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 37th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 1996, AIAA-96–0711.

10.

Braun

R. D.

Collaborative optimization: an architecture for large-scale distributed design. PhDThesis, Stanford University, 1996.

11.

Sobieski

I. P.

Kroo

Collaborative optimization applied to an aircraft design problem In Proceedings of AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1996, AIAA-96–0715.

12.

Bloebaum

C. L.

Hajela

Heuristic decomposition for non-hierarchic systems In Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 32nd Structures, Structure Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 1991, AIAA-91–1039.

13.

Sobieszczanski-Sobieski

Agte

Sandusky

Bi-level integrated system synthesis. In Proceedings of AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on

Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 1998, AIAA-98–4916.

14.

Renaud

J. E.

Gabriele

G. A.

Approximation in nonhierarchic system optimization

Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1994, 32 (1), 198–205.

15.

Renaud

J. E.

Gabriele

G. A.

Improved coordination in nonhierarchic system optimization

Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1993, 31 (12), 2367–2373.

16.

Hajela

Lin

C. Y.

Genetic search strategies in multi criterion optimal design In Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 32nd Structures, Structure Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 1991, AIAA-91–1040.

17.

Shin

M. K.

Park

G. J.

Multidisciplinary design optimization based on independent subspaces

Int. J. Numer. Meth. in Engng (not yet published).

18.

Park

Y. S.

Park

G. J.

Crash analysis and design of a belt integrated seat for occupant safety

Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2001, 215 (8), 875–889.

19.

LS-Dyna user's manual, 1998 (Livermore Software Technology Corporation).

20.

Obergefell

L. A.

Gardner

T. R.

Kaleps

Fleck

J. T.

Articulated total body model enhancements: user's guide, 1988 (Harry, G. Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory).

21.

Sobieszczanski-Sobieski

On the sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems

Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1990, 28 (1), 153–160.

22.

Sobieszczanski-Sobieski

Barthelemy

J. F.

Riley

K. M.

Sensitivity of optimum solutions to problem parameters

Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1982, 20 (9), 1291–1299.

23.

Barthelemy

J. F.

Sobieszczanski-Sobieski

Optimum sensitivity derivatives of objectives functions in nonlinear programming

Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1983, 21 (6), 913–915.

24.

Sobieszczanski-Sobieski

Sensitivity analysis and multidisciplinary design optimization for aircraft design: recent advances and results

J. Aircraft, 1990, 27 (12), 993–1001.

25.

Hajela

Bloebaum

C. L.

Sobieszczanski-Sobieski

Application of global sensitivity equations in multidisciplinary aircraft synthesis

J. Aircraft, 1990, 27 (12), 1002–1010.

26.

Shin

M. K.

Park

K. J.

Park

G. J.

Occupant analysis and seat design to reduce the neck injury for rear end impact

Int. J. Crashworthiness, 2003, 8 (6), 573–581.

27.

Shin

M. K.

Hong

S. W.

Park

G. J.

Axiomatic design of the motor driven tilt/telescopic steering system for safety and vibration

Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2001, 215 (2), 179–187.