The relationship of seat backrest angle and neck injury in low-velocity rear impacts

Abstract

Car-rear-impact-induced cervical spine injuries present a serious burden on society and, in response, seats offering enhanced protection have been introduced. Seats are evaluated for neck protection performance but only at one specific backrest angle, whereas in the real world this varies greatly owing to the variation in occupant physique. Changing the backrest angle modifies the seat geometry and thereby the nature of its interaction with the occupant.

Low-velocity rear-impact tests on a BioRID II anthropomorphic test dummy (ATD) have shown that changes in backrest angle have a significant proportionate effect on dummy kinematics. A close correlation was found between changes in backrest angle and the responses of neck injury predictors such as lower neck loading and lower neck shear but not for the neck injury criterion NIC_max. Torso ramping was evident, however, with negligible effect in low-velocity impacts.

The backrest angle ranged from 20° to 30° whereas the BioRID II spine was adapted to a range from 20° to 26.5°. Nevertheless, in general, instrumentation outputs correlated well, indicating that this ATD could be used for evaluating seats over a 20–30° range rather than solely at 25° as required by current approval test specifications.

Keywords

backrest angle head restraint neck injury criterion rear impact neck injury BioRID II

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee, Working Group 12 Report, Document 157, Annex 1, July 2002.

Chirwa

E. C.

Structural crashworthiness simulation of rear end collision of a small European car

Int. J. Crashworthiness, 1996, 1 (1), 21–35.

Chirwa

E. C.

Wang

Mechanics of mechanically triggered airbag head restraint system for occupant protection in rear impacts

Int. J. Crashworthiness, 1997, 2 (2), 165–189.

Latchford

Chirwa

E. C.

Development of head restraint with optimum stiffness. In Proceedings of the International Crashworthiness Conference, Dearborn, Michigan, USA, 9–11 September 1998, pp. 401–419 (Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK).

Latchford

Chirwa

E. C.

Airbag head restraint system

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2000, 214 (D3), 229–241.

Severy

D. M.

Blaisdell

D. M.

Lerkhoff

J. F.

Automotive seat design and collision performance. SAE transactions, 1976, Sec. 4, Vol. 85, 2251–2586.

Research Council for Automobile Repairs, RCAR, A Procedure for Evaluating Motor Vehicle Head Restraints, Issue 2, para 5.3.8. February 2001.

Cappon

Philippens

van Ratingen

Wismans

Development and evaluation of a new rear-impact crash dummy In Proceedings of 45th Stapp Car Crash Conference, 2001, paper no. 01S-20.

International Insurance Whiplash Prevention Group (IIWPG), 3rd meeting, 30–31 January 2002, (minutes paragraph 4 (Munich, Germany, Research Council for Automobile Repairs).

10.

Crash Analysis Criteria Description, version 1.6.1, Arbeitskreis, Messdatenverarbeitung, and Fahrzeug-sischerheit April 2004 edition. Bundesanstalt fur Strabenwesen, Bunderstraber 53, D-51427 Bergisch Gladbach.

11.

Davidson

Svenssen

M.Y.

Flogard

Haland

Jakabsson

Linder

Lovsand

Wiklund

A new biofidelic rear impact dummy In Proceedings of International IRCOBI Conference, 1998, SAE paper no. 1998-13-0026.

12.

Heitplatz

Sferco

Fay

Kim

Prasad

An evaluation of existing and proposed injury criteria with various dummies to determine their ability to predict the levels of soft tissue neck injury seen in the real world In Proceedings of 18th ESV conference, Nagoya, Japan, 2003, paper no. 504.

13.

Schmitt

K. U.

Musser

M. H.

Niederer

A new neck injury criterion candidate for rear-end collisions taking into account shear forces and bending moments In Proceedings of 17th ESV conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 2001, paper no. 124.

14.

Eppinger

Shashi

Kuppa

Saul

Development of improved injury criteria for the assessment of advanced automotive restraints systems-II. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), March 2000, FMVS no. 208 final rule.

15.

Bostrom

Haland

Fredriksson

Svensson

Y. M.

Mellander

A sled test procedure proposal to evaluate the risk of neck injury in low speed rear impacts In Proceedings of 16th ESV Conference, 1998, paper no. 98-S7-O-07.

16.

Davidson

BioRID II final report, 1999, report no. 1999-12-30, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteburg, Sweden.