A method has been derived for the identification of spatial emission hot-spots on vehicle road routes using chassis dynamometer data. The work presented here uses tailpipe-out carbon monoxide (CO) levels to demonstrate the application of the method. The approach is used to analyse critically methods used by legislators that derive road-side emission levels from the vehicle emission inventory and legislative emission levels. The work presented in this paper demonstrates that the generic approach using vehicle speed, gear change patterns, spatial geographical data, and route geometric information is sufficient for the identification of the location of emission hot-spots in any journey route of interest.
StedmanJ. R.LinehanE. B.A method for predicting roadside CO concentrations in the UK. DETR Report AEAT-5438, Issue 2, July 1999.
2.
MurrellsT. P.UK Road Transport Emission Projections: The assumptions used and results of the 1997 National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory Base Projections; Web: http://www.aeat.com/netcen/airqual/naei/roadproj/contents.html (date accessed 5 August 2004).
3.
AngelinoE.Traffic induced air pollution in Milan city: A modeling study. InUrban Transport and the Environment of the 21st Century, Rhodes, Greece, September 1999.
4.
ParkJ. Y.NolandR. B.PolakJ. W.A microscopic model of air pollutant concentrations: Comparisons of simulated results with measured and macroscopic estimates. InAnnual Transport Research Board Meeting Publication, 2000.
5.
CrabbeH.BeaumontR.NortonD.Assessment of air quality, emissions and management in a local urban environment. J. Environ. Monitoring and Assessment, 2000, 65 (1/2), 435–442.
6.
EllisK.McHughE.CarruthersD.StidworthyA.Comparison of ADMS-roads, CALINE4 and UK DMRB model predictions for roads. In 7th International Conference onHarmonization within Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling for Regulatory Purpose, Belgrate, Italy, May 2001.
7.
SamuelS.Transient vehicle emission levels and fuel economy in real-world driving conditions. PhD Thesis, Oxford Brookes University, 2004.
8.
MystkowskiC.KhanS.Estimating queue lengths using SIGNAL94, SYNCHRO3, TRANSFYT-7F, PASSER II-90 and CORSIM. In78th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting Publication, November 1998.
9.
ZiadZ.WallaceC. E.LinF.-B.Traffic analysis software tools. TRB Report E-CO14, September 2000.
10.
McDonaldM.WuJ.BrackstoneM.Development of a fuzzy logic based microscopic motorway simulation model. In Proceedings of the ITSC 97 Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, 1997.
11.
FellendorfM.VortischP.Validation of the microscopic traffic flow model VISSIM in different real-world situations. InVISSIM User Group Meeting Publications, Seattle, Washington, June 2001.
12.
SamuelS.MorreyD.FowkesM.TaylorD. H. C.AustinL.FelsteadT.LathamS.The most significant vehicle operating parameter for real-world emission levels. SAE paper 2004–01-0636, 2004.
13.
KleemanP. T.A fresh look at predicting carbon monoxide impacts at highway intersections. Report presented to TRB A1F03/A1F06 Joint Summer Meeting, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1998.
14.
KågesonP.Cycle beating and EU-Test cycle for cars. European Federation for Transport and Environment Report T&E 98/3, Brussels, Belgium, November 1998.
15.
FernandezP. C.LongJ. R.Assessment of commuting under grade and ramp metering: Preliminary on-road emission findings. In World Car Congress, University of California Riverside, January 1996.
16.
FreyC. H.RouphailN.UnalA.ColyerJ.Emissions and traffic control: An empirical approach. In Proceedings of CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, San Diego, California, March 2000.
17.
YuL.Effects of high emitter vehicle on the on-road vehicle emission modeling. Center for Transportation Training Research, Texas Southern University, Report SWUTC/00/467600–1, October 2000.
18.
SamuelS.MorreyD.FowkesM.TaylorD. H. C.AustinL.FeslteadT.LathamS.Real-world fuel economy and emission levels of a typical Euro-IV passenger vehicle. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2005, 219 (D6), 833–842.
19.
FelsteadT.MarsdenG.McDonaldM.AVERT - developing a drive cycle to illustrate driving conditions in Southampton. AVERT Project Working Paper by Transport Research Group, Southampton University, 2001.
CliffordM. J.ClarkeR.RiffatS. B.Drivers’ exposure to carbon monoxide in Nottingham, UK. Atmospheric Environ., 1997, 31 (7), 1003–1009.
22.
PetersenW. B.AllenR.Carbon monoxide exposures to Los Angelos area commuters. J. Air Pollution Control Ass., August 1982, 32 (8), 826–833.
23.
ChanC. C.OzkaynakH.SpendglerJ. D.SheldonL.Driver exposure to volatile organic compounds, CO, ozone, and NO2, under different driving conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1991, 25 (5), 964–972.
24.
CrookellA.SinclairP.Remote analysis of motor vehicle exhaust: The elusive emission factor. In 3rd International Conference on Urban Air Quality, Measurement Modeling and Management, Loutraki, Greece, 19–23 March 2001.
25.
CrookellA.Consultation paper on requirements for remote sensing devices for gaseous emission monitoring - a European perspective, funded by European Commission's Competitive and Sustainable Growth Programme, REVEAL- 1999-RD-0657, 13 July 2000.
26.
SamarasZ.Impact assessment/on board diagnostic (OBD) systems for passenger cars. Draft Final Report, Report 0409, for European Commission DG ENTR use, Laboratory of Applied Thermodynamics, University of Thessaloniki, Greece 3 July 2004.
27.
Highway effects on vehicle performance.Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transport, FHWA Report FHWA-RD-00–164, 2001.
28.
Streetmap for Southampton road map and aerial view;www.streetmap.co.uk (accessed September 2002).
29.
De PeterH.KellerM.Real-world driving cycles for emission measurements: ARTEMIS and Swiss cycles. BUWAL Report 255, Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests and Landscape, 17 March 2001.
30.
Van MierloJ.MaggettoG.Van de BurgwalE.GenseR.Driving style and traffic measures -influence on vehicle emissions and fuel consumption.
