The study was designed to investigate the effect of the model year on crashes and injuries, where the latter were of the mild to moderate variety, independent of other driver or vehicle factors and travel exposure. Previous research on vehicle safety design has focused on fatal or serious injuries but, for traffic safety evaluations in smaller jurisdictions and over limited time frames, a more numerous-outcome variable must be used.
The study was conducted with over 32 000 driver–vehicle combinations. Binary logistic regression was employed to estimate the effects of the model year ranges on injuries and driving exposure, while controlling the other factors. A salutory effect of increasing the model year on the injury risk was found but this was countered by the increased travel associated with the newer vehicles.
FallonI.O'NeillD.The world's first automobile fatality. Accid. Analysis Prev.200537, (4), 601–603
2.
FarmerC. M.LundA. K.Trends over time in the risk of driver death: What if vehicle designs had not improved?Traff. Injury Prev.20067, (4), 335–342
3.
KahaneC. J.Lives saved by the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and other vehicle safety technologies, 1960–2002. Technical report DOT HS 809 833, US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA 2004
4.
NewsteadS.WatsonL.CameronM.Vehicle safety ratings estimated from police reported crash data: 2009 update, Australian and New Zealand crashes during 1987–2007. Report 287, Monash University Accident Research Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia 2009
5.
NewsteadS.WatsonL.CameronM.Trends in crashworthiness of the New Zealand fleet by year of manufacture: Supplement to Report 287 vehicle safety ratings estimated from police reported crash data: 2009 update. Report 287 supplement, Monash University Accident Research Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia 2009
6.
MartinJ. L.LenguerrandE.A population based estimation of the driver protection provided by passenger cars: France 1996–2005. Accid. Analysis Prev.200840, (6), 1811–1821
7.
BlowsS.IversR.WoodwardM.ConnorJ.AmeratungaS.NortonR.Vehicle year and the risk of car crash injury. Injury Prev.20039, (4), 353–356
8.
KeallM.NewsteadS.JonesW.Projecting effects of improvements in passive safety of the New Zealand light vehicle fleet. Traff. Injury Prev.20078, (3), 275–280
9.
AndersonR. W. G.DoeckeS.SearsonD.Vehicle age-related crashworthiness of the South Australian passenger fleet. Report series CASR062, Centre for Automotive Safety, The University of Adeleaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, July 2009
10.
LesM.MorrisA.OlssonT.PetterssonJ.HolmqvistK.Vehicle properties determining aggressivity. In Proceedings of the Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 18–20 November 2001, paper 40 Monash University, Clayton, Victoria
11.
WoodD. P.SimmsC. K.Car size and injury risk: A model for injury risk in frontal collisions. Accid. Analysis Prev.200234, (1), 93–99
12.
FergusonS. A.SchneiderL. W.An overview of frontal airbag performance with changes in frontal crash-test requirements; findings of the blue ribbon panel for the evaluation of advanced technology air bags. Traff. Injury Prev.20089, (5), 421–431
13.
MacLennanP. A.AshwanderW. S.GriffinR.McGwinG.RueL. W.Injury risks between first- and second-generation air bags in frontal motor vehicle collisions. Accid. Analysis Prev.200840, (4), 1371–1374
14.
RybG. E.DischingerP. C.HoS.Vehicle model year and crash outcomes: A CIREN study. Traff. Injury Prev.200910, (6), 560–566
15.
TencerA. F.KaufmanR.MackC.MockC.Factors affecting pelvic and thoracic forces in near-side impact crashes: A study of US-NCAP, NASS and CIREN data. Accid. Analysis Prev.200537, (2), 287–293
16.
BrumbellowM. L.TeohE. R.ZubyD. S.McCarttA. T.Roof strength and injury risk in rollover crashes. Traff. Injury Prev.200910, (3), 252–265
17.
DangJ. N.Statistical analysis of the effectiveness of electronic stability control (ESC) systems – final report. Technical report DOT HS 810 794, US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA 2007
18.
ScullyJ.NewsteadS.Evaluation of electronic stability control effectiveness in Australia. Accid. Analysis Prev.200840, (6), 2050–2057
19.
ErkeA.Effects of electronic stability control (ESC) on accidents: A review of empirical evidence. Accid. Analysis Prev.200840, (1), 167–173
20.
CummingsP.GrossmanD. C.Antilock brakes and the risk of driver injury in a crash: A case-control study. Accid. Analysis Prev.200739, (5), 995–1000
21.
KahaneC. J.DangJ. N.The long-term effect of ABS in passenger cars and LTVs. Technical report DOT HS 811 182, US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA 2009
22.
RossM.WenzelT.Losing weight to save lives: A review of the role of automobile weight and size in traffic fatalities. Report ACEEE-TO13, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC, USA 2001
23.
BuzemanD. G.VianoD. C.LovsundP.Car occupant safety in frontal crashes: A parameter study of vehicle mass, impact speed and inherent vehicle protection. Accid. Analysis Prev.199830, (6), 713–722
24.
PoindexterK. N.Passenger vehicle involvement rates by vehicle. Technical report DOT HS 809 691, US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA 2003
25.
Survey of motor vehicle use. Report 9210.0.55.001, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia, 2008, Table 12
26.
GarchaA.2007 Canadian vehicle survey: Summary report. Report, Natural Resources Canada, Office of Energy Efficiency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, September 2009, Fig. 3.6
27.
HuP. S.ReuscherT. R.Summary of travel trends; 2001 National Household Travel Survey. Report, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, December 2004, p.40, Table 22
28.
PickrellD.SchimekP.Trends in personal motor vehicle ownership and use: Evidence from the National Personal Transportation Survey. Report, US Department of Transportation, Volpe Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, April 1998 25
29.
Statistics Norway. Registered distances covered by vehicles, 2008. Report, Transport, Tourism and ICT Statistics, Kongsvinger, Norway, 2009, Table 4
30.
StukentoD.CosgroveD.MitchellD.Survey of motor vehicle use – an investigation into coherence. Research paper 9208.0.55.005, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia 200551–52
31.
WangX.KockelmanK. M.Use of heteroscedastic ordered logit model to study severity of occupant injury. Transpn Res. Rec.20051908, 195–204
32.
Statistics Canada. Canadian vehicle survey: Quarterly; January to March 2009. Catalogue 53F0004X, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 2009
33.
ArdenkaniS.HauerE.JameiB.Traffic impact models. In Traffic flow theory: A state-of-the art report, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA 20017-1–7-24
