Stiffness Synthesis of a Five-Rod Suspension for Given Load-Displacement Characteristics

Abstract

The paper describes a novel algorithm for solving the synthesis problem of a multi-link wheel-guiding mechanism with a known topology and dimension. The synthesis objectives contain the elastokinematical specifications, described by a set of spatial displacements that the wheel carrier should undergo from a design position under specified loads corresponding to typical car manoeuvres. Radial spring rates of cylindrical elastomeric bushings, embodied in the suspension rods, are considered as design variables. Relations between the design variables and the objectives are established using the first-order kinematics and screw calculus, under assumptions about small displacements and linear force-deflection characteristics of the flexible elements. The problem is solved by using a constrained linear least-squares algorithm. Depending whether the input data is provided by a designer or acquired during suitable experiments, the algorithm can be used for synthesis or estimation of the stiffness parameters. Numerical examples are solved for two five-rod suspensions, with the same topology but different configuration and dimension, installed at rear-driven axles of actual cars. Static spring rates of the five rod-bushings are determined, for which both suspensions satisfy the formulated ride/handling criteria in the best way. Fundamental characteristics and limitations of the suspensions are described.

Keywords

synthesis wheel suspension elastokinematics elastomeric bushing screw

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Matchinsky

Radfuhrungen der Strassenfahrzeuge. Kinematik, elasto-kinematik und konstruktion, 1998 (Springer Berlin).

Simionescu

P. A.

Beale

Synthesis and analysis of the five-link rear suspension system used in automobiles. Mech. Mach. Theory, 2002, 37, 815–832.

Knapczyk

Maniowski

Dimensional synthesis of a five-rod guiding mechanism for car front wheels. Arch. Mech. Engng, 2003, L (1), 89–116.

Raghavan

Number and dimensional synthesis of independent suspension mechanisms. Mech. Mach. Theory, 1996, 31 (8), 1141–1153.

Merlet

J.-P.

Designing a parallel manipulator for a specific workspace. Res Report 2527, INRIA, 1995.

Huang

Roth

Position-force synthesis of closed-loop linkages. Trans. ASME, J. Mech. Design, 1994, 116, 155–162.

Knapczyk

Maniowski

Elastokinematical modeling and study of five-rod suspension with subframe. Mech. Mach. Theory, 2006, 41 (accepted for publication).

Hiller

Woernle

Elasto-kinematical analysis of a five-point wheel suspension. Ingeniurs de ĺ automobile, Paris 1985.

Knapczyk

Dzierżek

Displacement and force analysis of five-rod suspension with flexible joints. Trans. ASME, J. Mech. Design, 1995, 117

10.

Rocca

Russo

A feasibility study on elasto-kinematic parameter identification for a multilink suspension. Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2002, 216, 153–160.

11.

Kang

J. S.

Elastokinematic analysis and optimization of suspension compliance characteristics. SAE paper 970104, 1997, pp. 161–167.

12.

Tachikawa

Sakai

A multi-objective optimization method by sequential linear programming. SAE paper 880887, pp. 4901–4907.

13.

Thomas

Yuan-Chou

H. C.

Tesar

Optimal actuator stiffness distribution for robotic manipulators based on local dynamic criteria. In Proceedings of the International Conference on

Robotics and Automatics, IEEE, 1985, pp. 275–281.

14.

Ciblak

Lipkin

Synthesis of stiffnesses by springs. Proceedings of DETC'98, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Atlanta, Georgia 1998, pp. 1–10.

15.

Huang

Schimmels

J. M.

Achieving an arbitrary spatial stiffness with springs connected in parallel. Trans. ASME, J. Mech. Design, 1998, 120, 520–526.

16.

Davidson

Hunt

Robots and screw theory, 2004 (Oxford University Press).

17.

18.

Knapczyk

Maniowski

Selected effects of bushings characteristics on five-link suspension elastokinematics and in-plane dynamics. Mobility and Veh. Mech., 2002, 8 (1–2), 107–121.