Recent results in tilt control design and assessment of high-speed railway vehicles

Abstract

Active tilt control is a well-established technology in modern railway vehicles, for which currently used control approaches have evolved in an intuitive matter. This paper presents work on a set of novel strategies for achieving local tilt control, i.e. applied independently for each vehicle rather than the whole train precedence approach that is commonly used. A linearized dynamic model is developed for a modern tilting railway vehicle with a tilt mechanism (tilting bolster) providing tilt below the secondary suspension. It addresses the fundamental problems associated with straightforward feedback control, and briefly discusses the current industry norm, which employs command-driven with precedence strategy. Two new advanced schemes are proposed, a model-based estimation approach, and an optimal LQG-based approach, and compared to the command-driven with precedence. The performance of the control schemes is assessed through simulation using a new proposed assessment method.

Keywords

tilting railway vehicles tilt control tilt performance assessment Kalman-Bucy filter linear quadratic regulator

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Goodall

R. M.

Brown

Tilt technology still evolving as the cost falls

Railw. Gaz. Int., 2001, 157 (8), 521–525.

Goodall

R. M.

Active railway suspensions: Implementation status and technological trends

Veh. Syst. Dyn., 1997, 28, 87–117.

Boocock

King

B. L.

The development of the prototype advanced passenger train

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs., 1982, 196, 35–46.

Harborough

P. R.

Passenger comfort during high speed curving-summary report. Technical report 260–386-038, British Rail Research (BRR), May 1986.

Anonymous.

Railway applications; ride comfort for passengers; measurement and evaluation. European pre-standard ENV 12299, September 1998.

Goodall

R. M.

Zolotas

Evans

Assessment of the performance of tilt system controllers In The railway conference at railtex, 2000, Vol. 1 (Birmingham, UK).

Pearson

J. T.

Goodall

R. M.

Pratt

Control system studies of an active anti-roll bar tilt system for railway vehicles

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs., Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit 1998, 212 (F1), 43–60.

Zolotas

A. C.

Goodall

R. M.

Halikias

G. D.

New control strategies for tilting trains. In 17th Symposium Dynamics of Vehicles on Road and tracks IAVSD 2001, Copenhagen (Lyngby) (DK), International Association for Vehicle System Dynamics, August 2001.

Anderson

B. D.O.

Obinata

Model reduction for control sytems design, 2000 (Springer-Verlag, London, UK).

10.

Moore

B. C.

Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction

IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1981, AC-26, 17–32.

11.

Bay

J. S.

Fundamentals of linear state space systems, 1999 (McGraw-Hill, New York, USA).

12.

Zolotas

A. C.

Advanced control strategies for tilting trains. PhD Thesis, Loughborough University, UK, 2002.

13.

Kalman

R. E.

A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems

J. Basic Eng., Trans. ASME Ser. D, 1960, 82, 35–45.

14.

Brammer

Siffling

Kalman-Bucy filters, 1989 (Artech House, Norwood, MA, USA).

15.

Hong

Goodall

R. M.

State estimation for active steering of railway vehicles. IFAC'99, Beijing, China, 1999.

16.

Sharma

Crolla

D. A.

Wilson

D. A.

The design of a fully active suspension system incorporating a kalman filter for state estimation. IEE Control 1994 Conference Publication (389), 21–24 March 1994, vol. 389 (Coventry, UK).

17.

Friedland

Control system design-an introduction to state space methods, 1986 (McGraw-Hill, New York, USA).

18.

Skogestad

Postlethwaite

Multivariable feedback control: analysis and design, 2000 (Wiley, London, UK).

19.

Maciejowski

J. M.

Multivariable feedback design, 1989 (Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, USA).

20.

Anderson

B. D.O.

Moore

J. B.

Optimal control: linear quadratic methods, 1990 (Prentice-Hall Inc., London, UK).