At present, aircraft structural integrity is maintained by equally applying to an entire fleet knowledge obtained during the design phase and/or from a fleet sample and by introducing conservative assumptions, load surveys, costly inspections and maintenance procedures to safeguard airworthiness. Several investigations have highlighted the significant variations in individual aircraft usage and have indicated the inadequacy of applying “conservative” assumptions and updating the assumptions by monitoring a fleet sample. They have, in addition, suggested the importance of individual aircraft tracking (IAT). IAT can be achieved by fitting each aircraft with strain gauges to monitor critical component loads directly, but maintaining a large number of strain gauges entails high operational costs. Affordable IAT can be achieved by analysing recorded flight parameters to indicate usage, loads and fatigue indirectly. This paper reviews the key investigations into indirect IAT structural monitoring methods.
RotenbergerK. M.Strengthening the weak link of fatigue qualification. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 42nd Annual Forum, Washington DC, June 1986.
2.
Ten HaveA. A.Usage monitoring of military helicopters. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society Technical Specialist's Meeting onFatigue Methodology, Scottsdale, Arizona, October 1989.
3.
GoodD. E.DeiblerD. T.Helicopter structural integrity monitoring. In Proceedings of the 18th European Rotorcraft Forum, Avignon, France, September 1992.
4.
BarndtG. L.MoonS.Development of a fatigue tracking program for Navy rotary wing aircraft. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 50th Annual Forum, Washington DC, May 1994.
5.
MoonS.HingerC.Helicopter dynamic components fatigue tracking system. In Proceedings of the 18th ICAF Symposium onAeronautical Fatigue, Melbourne, Australia, May 1995.
6.
MoonS.MenonD.BarndtG.Fatigue life reliability based on measured usage, flight loads and fatigue strength variations. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 52nd Annual Forum, Washington DC, June 1996.
7.
DicksonB.CronkhiteJ.BielefeldS.KillianL.HaydenR.Feasibility study of a rotorcraft health and usage monitoring system (HUMS): Usage and structural life monitoring evaluation. Report NASA CR198447, DOT/FAA/AR-95/9, ARL-CR-290, February 1996.
8.
CronkhiteJ.DicksonB.MartinW.CollingwoodG.Operational evaluation of a health and usage monitoring system (HUMS). Report NASA CR207409, DOT/FAA/ AR-97/64, ARL-CR-420, April 1998.
9.
TealR. S.EvernhamJ. T.LarchukT. J.MillerD. G.MarquithD. E.WhiteF.DeiblerD. T.Regime recognition for MH-47E structural usage monitoring. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 53rd Annual Forum, Virginia Beach, Virginia, April 1997.
10.
RobesonE.ThompsonB.Tools for the 21st century: MH-47E SUMS. In Proceedings of the 2nd Structural Health Monitoring Workshop, Stanford University, California, September 1999.
11.
LombardoD. C.Helicopter structural usage monitoring work at DSTO airframes and engines division. In Proceedings of the DSTO Workshop onHealth and Usage Monitoring Systems, Melbourne, Australia, February 1999.
12.
CrawfordC.HH-60G mission usage spectrum survey. In Proceedings of the DSTO Workshop onHealth and Usage Monitoring Systems, Melbourne, Australia, February 1999.
13.
LuY.ChristR. A.PuckettT. A.TealR. S.ThompsonB.AH-64D Apache Longbow structural usage monitoring system. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 58th Annual Forum, Montreal, Canada, June 2002.
14.
WhiteD.McFallsM.LargessD.U.S. Army lead the fleet usage analysis. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference onHealth and Usage Monitoring, Melbourne, Australia, February 2003.
15.
McFallsM.WhiteD.WagnerE.Fatigue life analysis of helicopter dynamic components in the U. S. Army lead the fleet program. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 59th Annual Forum, Phoenix, Arizona, May 2003.
16.
LincolnJ. W.Overview of the structural integrity process. In Proceedings of the 77th Meeting of the AGARD Structures and Materials Panel, AGARD-R-797, Bordeaux, France, September 1993.
17.
SpiekhoutD. J.Reduction of fatigue load experience as part of the fatigue management program for F16 aircraft of the RNLAF. In Proceedings of the 77th Meeting of the AGARD Structures and Materials Panel, AGARD-R-797, Bordeaux, France, September 1993.
18.
DenyerA. G.Service life monitoring of the B-1B and the impact on flight operations and structural maintenance. In 7th RTO Meeting Proceedings onExploitation of Structural Loads/Health Data for Reduced Life Cycle Costs, Brussels, Belgium, May 1998.
19.
MoysonE.NATO TCA cycle counting study and its applications. In 7th RTO Meeting Proceedings onExploitation of Structural Loads/Health Data for Reduced Life Cycle Costs, Brussels, Belgium, May 1998.
20.
BucknerR. L.MerkleyD. J.US Army flight condition monitoring. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society Midwest Region Helicopter Fatigue Specialists Meeting, St Louis, Missouri, October 1984.
21.
BarndtG.McCoolK.Development efforts and requirements for implementation of Navy structural usage monitoring. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 58th Annual Forum, Montreal, Canada, June 2002.
22.
HillK.HudsonR. A.IrvingP. E.VellaA. D.Loading spectra, usage monitoring and prediction of fatigue damage in helicopters. In Proceedings of the 18th ICAF Symposium onAeronautical Fatigue, Melbourne, Australia, May 1995.
23.
SaylorD. M.Flight condition recognition (FCR) technique. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society Technical Specialists Meeting onFatigue Methodology, St Louis, Missouri, March 1980.
24.
DraperA.Fatigue usage monitoring in UK military helicopters. In Proceedings of the DSTO Workshop onHealth and Usage Monitoring Systems, Melbourne, Australia, February 1999.
25.
BucknerR. L.The collection of usage data to improve structural integrity of operational helicopters. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society National Technical Specialists Meeting onFatigue Methodology, Scottsdale, Arizona, October 1989.
26.
SpinelloM.MainoB.Helicopter usage monitoring systems—aiming at safer operation. In Proceedings of the 19th European Rotorcraft Forum, Como, Italy, September 1993.
27.
MangalamS.SarmaG.AugustinM.YearyD.Low cost/low airspeed sensor for helicopter applications. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 59th Annual Forum, Phoenix, Arizona, May 2003.
28.
HazellJ.An investigation into the feasibility of helicopter CofG/AUM calculation using HUMS/FDR parameters. Report MJAD/R/213/97 v1.0, Smiths Aerospace, Electronic Systems, Southampton, March 1997.
29.
WallaceM.SkrzypczakS.AzzamH.Synthesising helicopter weight and centre of gravity from flight parameters. In Proceedings of the Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering Management (COMADEM) Conference, Sunderland, July 1999.
30.
MoralesM. A.HaasD. J.Feasibility of aircraft gross weight estimation using artificial neural networks. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 57th Annual Forum, Washington DC, May 2001.
31.
FlynnT.HessR.NobleB.Methods of inferring rotorcraft gross weight. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, March 2003.
32.
BrandE.KrummeB.Flight state recognition with neural networks—a step to an overall usage monitoring system. In Proceedings of the 19th European Rotorcraft Forum, Como, Italy, September 1993.
33.
WallaceM.AzzamH.Applying advanced usage information to conventional fatigue calculation methods. Report MJAD/R/273/00 v1.0, Smiths Aerospace, Electronic Systems, Southampton, March 2000.
34.
WallaceM.AzzamH.Introducing conventional FCR methods. Report MJAD/R/310/02 v1.0, Smith Aerospace, Electronic Systems, Southampton, February 2002.
35.
AzzamH.Extraction of vibration and load patterns from steady state Lynx Mk9 data. Report MJAD/R/235/98 v1.0, Smiths Aerospace, Electronic Systems, Southampton, February 1998.
36.
WallaceM.AzzamH.Establishment of a structural integrity and fatigue management approach using the ES-S usage indices. Report REP1548 Issue 1, Smiths Aerospace, Electronic Systems, Southampton, January 2003.
37.
BoorlaR.RotenbergerK.Load variability of a two-bladed helicopter. J. Am. Helicopter Soc., January 1997, 42 (1), 15–26.
38.
GuntherG.Loads monitoring and HUMS. RTO AVT Lecture Series onAging Aircraft Fleets, Structural and Other Subsystem Aspects, RTO EN-015, Sofia, Bulgaria, November 2000.
39.
HendersonM. B.HarrisonG. F.Development and validation of algorithms for engine usage monitoring systems. In 7th RTO Meeting Proceedings onExploitation of Structural Loads/Health Data for Reduced Life Cycle Costs, Brussels, Belgium, May 1998.
40.
PettigrewJ. L.Helicopter engine cycle usage validation with a health and usage monitoring system. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 56th Annual Forum, Virginia Beach, Virginia, May 2000.
41.
SchaeferC. G.JrThe effects of aerial combat on helicopter structural integrity. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 45th Annual Forum, Boston, Massachusetts, May 1989.
42.
GunsallusC. T.PellumW. L.FlannellyW. G.Holometrics: An information transformation methodology. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 44th Annual Forum, Washington DC, June 1988.
43.
GunsallusC. T.Rotating system load monitoring using minimum fixed system instrumentation. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society National Technical Specialists Meeting onFatigue Methodology, Scottsdale, Arizona, October 1989.
44.
GunsallusC. T.RobesonE.AH-64A rotating load usage monitoring from fixed system information. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society National Technical Specialists Meeting on Rotorcraft Structures, Williamsburg, Virginia, October 1991.
45.
GustavsonB.PellumW. L.RobesonE.Systematic application of holometric synthesis for cost-effective flight load monitoring. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 49th Annual Forum, St Louis, Missouri, May 1993.
46.
PolancoF. G.Development of a stress transfer function for an idealised helicopter structure. Australian Defence Science and Technology Organisation Document DSTO- RR-0171, March 2000.
47.
HaasD. J.Determination of helicopter flight loads from fixed system measurements. In Proceedings of the 32nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, April 1991.
48.
HaasD. J.ImberR.Identification of helicopter component loads using multiple regression. J. Aircraft, July 1994, 31 (4), 925–935.
49.
AzzamH.The use of helicopter flight parameters for fatigue damage prediction. Report MJAD/R/125/93 v1.0, Smiths Aerospace, Electronic Systems, Southampton, April 1993.
50.
AzzamH.A practical approach for the indirect prediction of structural fatigue from measured flight parameters. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part G: J. Aerospace Engineering, June 1997, 211 (G1), 29–38.
51.
ZionL.Predicting fatigue loads using regression diagnostics. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 50th Annual Forum, Washington DC, May 1994.
52.
ZionL.Some simple approaches to reliable fatigue damage prediction. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society National Specialists’ Meeting, Williamsburg, Virginia, January 1997.
53.
TangS. S.O'BrienL. J.A novel method for fatigue life monitoring of non-airframe components. In Proceedings of the AIAA 32nd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, April 1991.
54.
TangS. S.MoffattJ.Flight load models for the on- board fatigue usage processing of mechanical components on helicopters. In Proceedings of the AIAA Dynamics Specialists Conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina, April 1994.
55.
TangS. S.MoffattJ.Development of an on-board fatigue processor for helicopters. Int. J. Fatigue, 1996, 18 (3), 179–186.
56.
RumelhartD.McClellandJ. L.Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 1, 1989 (The MIT press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
57.
HaykinS.Neural Networks, A Comprehensive Foundation, 1994. (Macmillan Publishing Company, New York).
58.
AzzamH.The use of mathematical models and artificial intelligence techniques to improve HUMS prediction capabilities. In Proceedings of the Royal Aeronautical Society Innovation in Rotorcraft Technology Conference, London, June 1997.
59.
HaasD. J.MilanoJ.FlitterL.Prediction of helicopter component loads using neural networks. In Proceedings of the 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina, April 1993.
60.
HaasD. J.FlitterL.MilanoJ.Helicopter flight data feature extraction from component load monitoring. In Proceedings of the 35th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina, April 1994.
61.
FlitterL. A.McCoolK.HaasD. J.Rotor system load monitoring using a neural network based approach. In Proceedings of the AIAA Modelling and Simulation Technologies Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, August 1997.
62.
McCoolK. M.FlitterL. A.HaasD. J.Development and flight test evaluation of a rotor system load monitoring technology. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 54th Annual Forum, Washington DC, May 1998.
CabellR. H.FullerC. R.O'BrienW. F.Neural network modelling of oscillatory loads and fatigue damage estimation of helicopter components. J. Sound Vibr., 1998, 209 (2), 329–342.
65.
HoffmanM. E.Improving predictions for helicopter usage monitoring. In Proceedings of the USAF Structural Integrity Program Conference, San Antonio, Texas, December 1994.
66.
ManryM. T.HsiehC. H.ChandrasekaranH.Near- optimal flight load synthesis using neural nets. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop onNeural Networks for Signal Processing, Madison, Wisconsin, August 1999.
67.
LevinskiO.Prediction of buffet loads using artificial neural networks. Document DSTO-RR-0218, Australian Defence Science and Technology Organisation, September 2001.
68.
AzzamH.FUMS—an emerging technology for improved safety, reduced costs and increased availability of aircraft. In Proceedings of the Farnborough International Technology Exploitation Conference, London, September 1998.
69.
SkrzypczakS.BeavenF.AzzamH.Secondary validation of mathematical networks by blind test. Report MJAD/R/294/01 v1.0, Smiths Aerospace, Electronic Systems, Southampton, February 2001.
70.
BeavenF.AzzamH.HebdenI.GillL.A mathematical network approach to structural prognostic health management. In Proceedings of the First European Conference onStructural Health Monitoring, Paris, France, July 2002.
71.
WallaceM.BeavenF.WakefieldN.AzzamH.Configuration of ES-S mathematical networks for Tornado structural locations. Report REP1534 Issue 1, Smiths Aerospace, Electronic Systems, Southampton, August 2002.
72.
AzzamH.The use of a fatigue state decider to improve the performance of a helicopter fatigue damage prediction network. Report MJAD/R/166/95 v1.0, Smiths Aerospace, Electronic Systems, Southampton, March 1995.
73.
AzzamH.A mathematical network approach to establish relationships between faults, vibration, loads and fatigue. Report MJAD/R/248/99 v1.0, Smiths Aerospace, Electronic Systems, Southampton, March 1999.
74.
WallaceM.AzzamH.HebdenI.GillL.Monitoring the damaging effects of aircraft rare events. In Proceedings of the First European Conference onStructural Health Monitoring, Paris, France, July 2002.
75.
WallaceM.Configuration of a helicopter finite element model for load simulation. Report MJAD/R/239/98 v1.0, Smiths Aerospace, Electronic Systems, Southampton, June 1998.
76.
WallaceM.AzzamH.Development and use of a finite element model to investigate the relationship between helicopter hub loads and airframe stresses. In Proceedings of the MSC UK Users’ Conference, June 1999.
77.
BeavenF.WallaceM.Configuration/enhancement of Lynx, Sea King and Chinook finite element models. Report MJAD/R/290/00 v1.0, Smiths Aerospace, Electronic Systems, Southampton, December 2000.
78.
Van den HoevenA. M.CC130 data analysis system for OLM/IAT. In 7th RTO Meeting Proceedings onExploitation of Structural Loads/Health Data for Reduced Life Cycle Costs, Brussels, Belgium, May 1998.
79.
HuntS. R.HebdenI. G.Eurofighter 2000: An integrated approach to structural health and usage monitoring. In 7th RTO Meeting Proceedings onExploitation of Structural Loads/Health Data for Reduced Life Cycle Costs, Brussels, Belgium, May 1998.
80.
ArmitageS. R.HolfordD. M.Future fatigue monitoring systems. In 7th RTO Meeting Proceedings onExploitation of Structural Loads/Health Data for Reduced Life Cycle Costs, Brussels, Belgium, May 1998.
81.
MoonS.PetersonH.ZhuT.DivekarA.Development of a helicopter airframe flight-by-flight fatigue load spectrum. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 55th Annual Forum, Montreal, Canada, May 1999.
82.
ShkarayevS.RamanA.TesslerA.Computational and experimental validation enabling a viable in-flight structural health monitoring technology. In Proceedings of the First European Workshop onStructural Health Monitoring, Paris, France, July 2002.
83.
CaronY.RichardY.CF-188 fatigue life management program. In 7th RTO Meeting Proceedings onExploitation of Structural Loads/Health Data for Reduced Life Cycle Costs, Brussels, Belgium, May 1998.
