The effect of uncertainties on performance predictions of a helicopter is studied in this article. The aeroelastic parameters such as the air density, blade profile drag coefficient, main rotor angular velocity, main rotor radius, and blade chord are considered as uncertain variables. The propagation of these uncertainties in the performance parameters such as thrust coefficient, figure of merit, induced velocity, and power required are studied using Monte Carlo simulation and the first-order reliability method. The Rankine—Froude momentum theory is used for performance prediction in hover, axial climb, and forward flight. The propagation of uncertainty causes large deviations from the baseline deterministic predictions, which undoubtedly affect both the achievable performance and the safety of the helicopter. The numerical results in this article provide useful bounds on helicopter power requirements.
OberkampfW. L.HeltonJ. C.SentzK.‘Mathe-matical representation of uncertainty’. In Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Seattle, Washington, USA, 16–19 April 2001.
ChengJ.JiangJ. J.XiaoR. C.‘Aerostatic stability analysis of suspension bridges under parametric uncertainty’Eng. Struct.2513 (2003): 1675–1684
4.
KareemA.‘Aerodynamic response of structures with parametric uncertainties’Struct. Saf.53 (1988): 205–225
5.
HasselmanT.‘Quantification of uncertainty in structural dynamic models’J. Aerosp. Engng144 (2001): 158–165
6.
GuoJ.DuX.‘Sensitivity analysis with mixture of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties’AIAA J.459 (2007): 2337–2349
7.
OhD. H.LibrescuL.‘Free vibration and reliability of composite cantilevers featuring uncertain properties’Reliab. Engng. Syst. Saf.56 (1997): 265–272
8.
AntonioC. C.HoffbauerL. N.‘From local to global importance measures of uncertainty propagation in composite structures’Compos. Struct.85 (2008): 213–225
9.
GarciaO.VehiJ.MatosJ. C.HenriquesA. A.CasasJ. R.‘Structural assessment under uncertain parameters via interval analysis’J. Comput. Appl. Math.218 (2008): 43–52
10.
MahadevanS.DeyA.TryonR.WangY.RousseauC.‘Reliability analysis of rotorcraft composite structures’J. Aerosp. Engng144 (2001): 140–146
11.
LoevenG. J. A.WitteveenJ. A. S.BijlH.‘Probabilistic collocation: An efficient non-intrusive approach for arbitrarily distributed parametric uncertainties.’ In Proceedings of the 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 8–11 January 2007.
12.
WaltersR. W.HuyseL.‘Uncertainty analysis for fluid mechanics with applications’ (2002): Pp. 1–50 ICASE report no. 2002–1, NASA CR-2002–211449.
13.
HosderS.WaltersR. W.PerezR.‘A non-intrusive polynomial chaos method for uncertainty propagation in CFD simulations.’ In Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 9–12 January 2006.
14.
PettitC. L.‘Uncertainty quantification in aeroelasti-city: Recent results and research challenges’J. Aircr.415 (2004): 1217–1229
15.
MuruganS.GanguliR.HarursampathD.‘Aero-elastic response of composite helicopter rotor with random material properties’J. Aircr.451 (2008): 306–322
16.
MuruganS.HarursampathD.GanguliR.‘Mat-erial uncertainty propagation in helicopter nonlinear aeroelastic response and vibratory analysis’AIAA J.469 (2008): 2332–2344
17.
HosderS.WaltersR. W.BalchM.‘Efficient uncertainty quantification applied to the aeroelastic analysis of a transonic wing’. In Proceedings of the 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 7–10 January 2008.
18.
GagliardiA.BarakosG. N.‘Analysis and design of a flap-equipped low-twist rotor for hover’J. Aircr.461 (2009): 74–84
19.
SteijlR.BarakosG.‘Sliding, mesh algorithm for CFD analysis of helicopter rotor-fuselage aerodynamics’Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids585 (2008): 527–549
20.
GennarettiM.BernardiniG.‘Aeroelastic response of helicopter rotors using a 3D unsteady aerodynamic solver’Aeronaut. J.1101114 (2006): 793–801
21.
DietzM.KesslerM.KramerE.WagnerS.‘Tip vortex conservation on a helicopter main rotor using vortex-adapted chimera grids.’ In Proceedings of the AIAA 24th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Francisco, California, 5–8 June 2006.
22.
SteijlR.BarakosG.BadcockK.‘A framework for CFD analysis of helicopter rotors in hover and forward flight’Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids518 (2006): 5–21
23.
StrawnR. C.CaradonnaF. X.DuqueE. P. N.‘30 years of rotorcraft computational fluid dynamics research and development’J. Am. Helicopter Soc.511 (2006): 5–21
24.
ZhaoQ. J.XuG. H.ZhaoJ. G.‘New hybrid method for predicting the flow fields of helicopter rotors’J. Aircr.432 (2006): 373–380
LeishmanJ. G.AnanthanS.‘An optimal coaxial rotor system for axial flight’J. Am. Helicopter Soc.534 (2008): 366–381
27.
CaoY. H.LiG. Z.YangQ.‘Studies of trims, stability, controllability, and some flying qualities of a tandem rotor helicopter’Proc. IMechE, Part G: J. Aerospace Engineering 223 G2 (2009): 171–177 DOI: 10.1243/09544100JAERO462.
28.
Le ChuitonF.‘Actuator disc modeling for helicopter rotors’Aerosp. Sci. Technol.84 (2004): 285–297
29.
RosenA.GurO.‘Novel approach to axisymmetric actuator disk modeling’AIAA J.4611 (2008): 2914–2925
30.
CueravA.Sanz-AndersA.MeseguerJ.EspinoJ. L.‘An engineering modification of the blade element momentum equation for vertical descent: An autorotation case study’J. Am. Helicopter Soc.514 (2006): 349–354
31.
KimH. W.KenyonA.R.BrownR. E.DuraisamyK.‘Interactional aero-dynamics and acoustics of a hingless coaxial helicopter with an auxiliary propeller in forward flight’Aeronaut. J.1131140 (2009): 65–78
ArnoldU. T. P.KellerJ. D.CurtissH. C.ReichertG.‘The effect of inflow models on the predicted response of helicopters’J. Am. Helicopter Soc.431 (1998): 25–36
41.
LeishmanJ. G.Principles of helicopter aerodynamics (New York: Cambridge University Press2006)
42.
GessowA.GarryC. M.Aerodynamics of helicopter (New York: College Park Press, Macmillan1952)
43.
StepniewskiW. Z.Rotary wing aerodynamics (Mineola, New York: Dover Publications1984)
44.
JohnsonW.Helicopter theory (Mineola, New York: Dover Publications1994)
45.
NewmanS.Foundation of helicopter flight (UK: Butterworth-Heinemann1994)
46.
HajelaP.VittalS.‘Optimal design in the presence of modeling uncertainties’J. Aerosp. Engng194 (2006): 204–216
