This study investigates the effect of stem insertion rate on the porosity of the cement mantle. An experimental protocol was developed to simulate the surgical technique of cementing a prosthetic stem into the medullary canal of the femur. Cement mantle specimens were produced for three different stem insertion rates. The presence of porosity in the cement mantle was investigated. Additionally, the mechanical strength of the bone cement was assessed. Increasing the stem insertion rate did not have a significant effect on the porosity distribution within the bulk cement mantle. However, for all stem insertion rates investigated, the porosity concentration increased significantly moving from the cement/pseudofemur interface through to the stem/cement interface. In all cases, the presence of porosity significantly decreased the mechanical behaviour of the bone cement. High porosity concentration at the stem/cement interface seems to be attributed also to the rheology of the cement during implant insertion. Nevertheless, the surgeon cannot influence the formation of porosity by changing the stem insertion rate.
MalchauH.HerbertsP.SodermanP.OdenA.Prognosis of total hip replacement. Update and validation results from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Registry 1979–1998. In 67th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Orlando, Florida, 2000, pp. 1–16.
2.
JastyM.MaloneyW. J.BragdonC. R.O'ConnorD. O.HaireT.HarrisW. H.The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J. Bone Jt Surg. (Br), 1991, 73 (4), 551–558.
3.
TopoleskiL. D. T.DucheyneP.CucklerJ. M.Microstructural pathway of fracture in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement. Biomaterials, 1993, 14 (15), 1165–1172.
4.
CharnleyJ.Low friction principle. In Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip. Theory and Practice (Ed. CharnleyJ.), 1979, pp. 3–15 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
5.
EbramzadehE.SarmientoA.McKellopH. A.LlinasA.GoganW.The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results. J. Bone Jt Surg. (Am.), 1994, 76 (1), 77–87.
6.
VerdonschotN.HuiskesR.Cement debonding process of total hip arthroplasty stems. Clin. Orthop., 1997, 336, 297–307.
7.
JamesS. P.SchmalzriedT. P.McGarryF. J.HarrisW. H.Extensive porosity at the cement-femoral prosthesis interface: A preliminary study. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1993, 27 (1), 71–78.
8.
McCormackB. A. O.PrendergastP. J.O'DwyerB.Fatigue of cemented hip replacements under torsional loads. Fatigue Fracture Engng Mater. Struct., 1999, 22, 33–40.
9.
MurphyB. P.PrendergastP. J.On the magnitude and variability of the fatigue strength of acrylic bone cement. Int. J. Fatigue, 2000, 22, 855–864.
10.
JastyM.DaviesJ. P.O'ConnorD. O.BurkeD. W.HarriganT. P.HarrisW. H.Porosity of various preparations of acrylic bone cements. Clin. Orthop., 1990, 259, 122–129.
11.
WangJ. S.FlivikG.TaylorM.LindgrenL.Stem cement interface shear strength is influenced by stem surface finish but not cement interface porosity. In Transactions of the 9th Conference of the European Orthopaedic Research Society, Brussels, 1999, p. 87.
12.
LewisG.Effect of mixing method and storage temperature of cement constituents on the fatigue and porosity of acrylic bone cement. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1999, 48 (2), 143–149.
13.
LindgrenL.DrarH.MollerJ.Strength of poly-methylmethacrylate increased by vacuum mixing. Acta Orthopaedica Scand., 1984, 55 (5), 536–541.
14.
KennyP.RiceJ.McCormackB.O'RourkeS. K.Vacuum loading of the femoral cement gun: The effect on mantle porosity. Hip Int., 1998, 8 (4), 219–222.
15.
BishopN. E.FergusonS.TepicS.Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface. J. Bone Jt Surg. (Br.), 1996, 78 (3), 349–356.
16.
FognaniR.BaleaniM.CristofoliniL.ToniA.Porosity and hardness in the acrylic cement mantle of cemented hip prostheses. In 9th Conference of the European Orthopaedic Research Society, Brussels, 1999, p. P9.
17.
MajkowskiR. S.BannisterG. C.MilesA. W.The effect of bleeding on the cement-bone interface. An experimental study. Clin. Orthop., 1994, 299, 293–297.
18.
BenjaminJ. B.GieG. A.LeeA. J. C.LingR. S.M.VolzR. G.Cementing technique and the effects of bleeding. J. Bone Jt Surg. (Br.), 1987, 69 (4), 620–624.
19.
HelmkeH. W.LednickyC. L.TullosH. S.Porosity of the cement/metal interface following cemented hip replacement. In 38th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Washington, 1992, p. 364.
20.
ChaoE. Y.ChinH. C.StaufferR. N.Roentgenographic and mechanical performance of centrifuged cement in a simulated total hip arthroplasty model. Clin. Orthop., 1992, 285, 91–101.
21.
JamesS. P.KarydasD.McGarryF. J.HarrisW. H.Reduction of the extensive porosity in the cement at the femoral component/bone cement interface. In 39th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, 1993, p. 520.
22.
GrahamJ.PruittL.RiesM.GundiahN.Fracture and fatigue properties of acrylic bone cement: The effects of mixing method, sterilization treatment, and molecular weight. J. Arthroplasty, 2000, 15 (8), 1028–1035.
23.
FritschE. W.Static and fatigue properties of two new low-viscosity PMMA bone cements improved by vacuum mixing. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1996, 31 (4), 451–456.
24.
DaviesJ. P.O'ConnorD. O.BurkeD. W.JastyM.HarrisW. H.The effect of centrifugation on the fatigue life of bone cement in the presence of surface irregularities. Clin. Orthop., 1988, 229, 156–161.
25.
WixsonR. L.LautenschlagerE. P.NovakM. A.Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement. J. Arthroplasty, 1987, 2 (2), 141–149.
26.
HeuerD. A.MannK. A.Fatigue fracture of the stem-cement interface with a clamped cantilever beam test. J. Biomech. Engng, 2000, 122 (6), 647–651.
27.
RaabS.AhmedA. M.ProvanJ. W.Thin film PMMA precoating for improved implant bone-cement fixation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1982, 16 (5), 679–704.
28.
WangJ.Toksvig LarsenS.Muller WilleP.Is there any difference between vacuum mixing systems in reducing bone cement porosity?J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1996, 33 (2), 115–119.
