Previous experimental observations indicated that the contact interactions between finger and tool handle interfere with the grasp stability, affecting the comfort and manipulations of handheld tools. From a biomechanical point of view, the curvature of the contact surface should affect the contact pressure and contact area, and thereby the comfort and manipulations of hand tools. The current authors analysed, via a finite element model, the contact interactions between fingertips and objects with different curvatures. The effects of the curvature on the contact stiffness, fingertip deformations, contact pressure distributions, and stress/strain distributions within the soft tissues were analysed. The simulation results indicated that the curvature of the contact interface influences the contact characteristics significantly. For a given contact force, the contact area and the contact stiffness increase but the contact pressure and the fingertip deformation decrease with the decrease of the contact surface curvature. The present simulation results will be useful for ergonomic designers in their aim to improve the design of tool handles.
Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses, 1999 (US Department of Labor, Washington, DC).
2.
TanakaS.WildD. K.SeligmenP. J.HalperinW. E.BehrensV. J.Putz-AndersonV.Prevalence and work-relatedness of self-reported carpal tunnel syndrome among US workers: Analysis of the occupational health supplement data of 1988 national health interview surveyAm. J. Ind. Medicine, 1995, 27 (4), 451–470.
3.
TanakaS.WildD. K.CameronL. L.FreundE.Association of occupational and non-occupational risk factors with the prevalence of self-reported carpal tunnel syndrome in a national survey of the working populationAm. J. Ind. Medicine, 1997, 32 (5), 550–556.
4.
GrantK. A.HabesD. J.StewartL. L.An analysis of handle designs for reducing manual effort: The influence of grip diameterInt. J. Ind. Ergon, 1992, 10 (3), 199–206.
5.
KongY. K.FreivaldsA.Evaluation of meat-hook handle shapesInt. J. Ind. Ergon, 2003, 32, 13–23.
6.
WuS. P.Effects of the handle diameter and tip angle of chopsticks on the food-serving performance of male subjectsAppl. Ergon, 1995, 26 (6), 379–385.
7.
ChanT.A study for determining the optimum diameter of chopsticksInt. J. Ergon, 1999, 23, 101–105.
8.
AdamsS. K.PetersonP. J.Maximum voluntary hand grip torque for circular electrical connectorsAppl. Ergon, 1990, 21, 78–79.
9.
BjoringG.JohanssonL.HaggG.Choice of handle characteristics for pistol grip power toolsInt. J. Ergon, 1999, 24, 647–656.
ImrhanS. N.FarahmandK.Male torque strength in simulated oil rig tasks: The effects of grease-smeared gloves and handle length, diameter and orientationAppl. Ergon, 1999, 30, 455–462.
12.
JenmalmP.GoodwinA. W.JohanssonR. S.Control of grasp stability when humans lift objects with different surface curvaturesJ. Neurophysiol., 1998, 79 (4), 1643–1652.
13.
FreundJ.ToivonenR.TakalaE. P.Grip forces of the fingertipsClin. Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2002, 17 (7), 515–520.
14.
OhS.RadwinR. G.Pistol grip power tool handle and trigger size effects on grip exertions and operator preferenceHuman Factors, 1993, 35 (3), 551–569.
15.
SerinaE.MoteC.RempelD.Force response of the fingertip pulp to repeated compression -effects of loading rate, loading angle and anthropometryJ. Biomechanics, 1997, 30 (10), 1035–1040.
16.
PawlukD.HoweR.Dynamic contact of the human fingerpad against a flat surfaceTrans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng, 1999, 121 (6), 605–611.
17.
WuJ. Z.DongR. G.SmutzW. P.RakhejaS.Dynamic interaction between a fingerpad and a flat surface: Experiments and analysisMed. Engng Physics, 2003, 25 (5), 397–406.
18.
WuJ. Z.DongR. G.SmutzW. P.SchopperA. W.Modeling of time-dependent force response of fingertip to dynamic loadingJ. Biomechanics, 2003, 36, 383–392.
19.
WuJ. Z.DongR. G.SchopperA. W.SmutzW. P.Analysis of skin deformation profiles during sinusoidal vibration of fingerpadAnn. Biomed. Engng, 2003, 31 (7), 867–878.
20.
ClementeC. D.Anatomy: A Regional Atlas of the Human Body, 2nd edition, 1981 (Urban and Achwarzengerg, Baltimore and Munich).
21.
RempelD.DennerleinJ.MoteC.JrArmstrongT.A method of measuring fingertip loading during keyboard useJ. Biomechanics, 1994, 27, 1101–1104.
22.
NeremR.Vibration enhancement of blood-arterial wall macromolecule transport. In International Hand-Arm Vibration Conference, Cincinnati, USA, 1977, pp. 37–41.
23.
BovenziM.Vibration white finger, digital blood pressure, and some biochemical findings on workers operating vibrating tools in the engine manufacturing industryAm. J. Ind. Medicine, 1988, 14 (5), 575–584.
24.
EkenvallL.LindbladL. E.Vibration white finger and digital systolic pressure during coolingBr. J. Ind. Medicine, 1986, 43 (4), 280–283.
25.
TschoeglN. W.The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior: An Introduction, 1989 (Springer-Verlag, New York).
26.
StorakersB.On material representation and constitutive branching in finite compressible elasticityJ. Mech. Phys. Solid, 1986, 34 (2), 125–145.
27.
MowV. C.KueiS. C.LaiW. M.ArmstrongC. G.Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage: Theory and experimentTrans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng, 1980, 102, 73–84.
28.
HomesM.MowV. C.Nonlinear characteristics of soft gels and hydrated connective tissues in ultrafiltrationJ. Biomechanics, 1990, 23, 1145–1156.
29.
WuJ. Z.HerzogW.Finite element simulation of location- and time-dependent mechanical behavior of chondrocytes in unconfined compression testsAnn. Biomed. Engng, 2000, 28 (3), 318–330.
30.
YamadaH.Strength of Biological Materials, 1970 (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland).
31.
PanL.ZanL.FosterF.Ultrasonic and visco-elastic properties of skin under transverse mechanical stressin vitro. Ultrasound Med. Biology, 1998, 24 (7), 995–1007.
32.
Wan AbasW. A.Biaxial tension test of human skinin vivo. Biomed. Mater. Engng, 1994, 4 (7), 473–486.
33.
ZhengY. P.MakA. F.An ultrasound indentation system for biomechanical properties assessment of soft tissuesin vivo. IEEE Biomed. Engng, 1996, 43 (9), 912–918.
34.
ZhangJ.MakA.HuangL.A large deformation biomechanical model for pressure ulcersTrans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng, 1997, 119, 406–408.
