Dynamic tracking of the scapula using skin-mounted markers

Abstract

The shoulder complex is prone to numerous pathologies and instabilities due to its large range of motion. The extent of injury is assessed through a series of observations and physical examinations. It is hypothesized that objective kinematic analysis of the shoulder could yield useful functional insights to aid clinical practice. Non-invasive motion analysis techniques to monitor shoulder function have been developed using passive markers; however, accurate measurement of scapula kinematics is problematic because of overlying tissue. The scapula locator is the accepted standard by which alternative non-invasive techniques of scapula tracking are validated. In this study, the viability of using skin-mounted markers to measure dynamic scapula movement is determined. Complete kinematic descriptions of ten healthy shoulders were obtained. Elevations of the glenohumeral joint were similar with both techniques, indicating that the skin marker method is suitable for gathering functional glenohumeral data. The main differences of note are seen at the scapulothoracic articulation where the skin marker method underestimated lateral rotation by more than 50° at maximum elevation. However, the correlation between the two approaches is greater than 0.7, suggesting that it may be possible to derive linear regression models to predict dynamic scapulothoracic lateral rotation accurately using skin-mounted scapula markers.

Keywords

shoulder scapula skin artefact passive markers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Placzek

J. D.

Lukens

S. C.

Badalanmeti

Roubal

P. J.

Freeman

D. C.

Walleman

K. M.

Parrot

Wiater

J. M.

‘Shoulder outcome measures. A comparison of 6 functional tests.’

Am. J. Sports Med. 32 (5) (2004): 1270–1277

Dawson

Fitzpatrick

Carr

‘Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery.’

J. Bone Jt Surg. Br. 78 (4) (1996): 593–600

Dawson

Fitzpatrick

Carr

‘The assessment of shoulder instability. The development and validation of a questionnaire.’

J. Bone Jt Surg. Br. 81 (3) (1999): 420–426

Dawson

Hill

Fitzpatrick

Carr

‘The benefits of using patient-based methods of assessment. Medium-term results of an observational study of shoulder surgery.’

J. Bone Jt Surg. Br. 83 (6) (2001): 877–882

Constant

C. R.

Murley

A. H. G.

‘A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.’

Clin. Orthop. 214 (1987): 160–164

Richards

R. R.

Bigliani

L. U.

Friedman

R. J.

Gartsman

J. M.

Gristina

A. G.

Iannotti

J. P.

Mow

V. C.

Sidles

J. A.

Zuckerman

J. D.

‘A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function.’

J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 3 (1994): 347–352

Fayad

Roby-Brami

Yazbeck

Hanneton

Lefevre-Colau

M. M.

Gautheron

Poiraudeau

Revel

‘Three-dimensional scapular kinematics and scapulohumeral rhythm in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis or frozen shoulder.’

J. Biomech. 41 (2008): 326–332

Meskers

C. G. M.

Vermeulen

H. M.

de Groot

J.H.

van der Helm

F.C.T.

Rozing

P. M.

‘3D shoulder position measurements using six-degree-of-freedom electromagnetic tracking device.’

Clin. Biomech. 13 (1998): 280–292

Pronk

The shoulder girdle (University of Delft 1991)

10.

Johnson

G. R.

Stuart

P. R.

Mitchell

‘A method for the measurements of three-dimensional scapular movement.’

Clin. Biomech. 8 (1993): 269–273

11.

van der Helm

F. C. T.

Pronk

G. M.

‘Three dimensional recording and description of motions of the shoulder mechanism.’

Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng 177 (1995): 27–40

12.

Ludewig

P. M.

Cook

T. M.

‘Translations of the humerus in persons with shoulder impingement syndromes.’

J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Therapy 32 (2002): 248–259

13.

Ogston

J. B.

Ludewig

P. M.

‘Differences in 3-dimensional shoulder kinematics between persons with multidirectional instability and asymptomatic controls.’

Am. J. Sports Med. 35 (2007): 1361–1370

14.

Meskers

M. A. J.

van de Sande

C. G. M.

de Groot

J.H.

‘Comparison between tripod and skin-fixed recording of scapular motion.’

J. Biomech. 40 (4) (2007): 941–946

15.

Barnett

N. D.

Duncan

R. D. D.

Johnson

G. R.

‘The measurement of three dimensional scapulohumeral kinematics a study of reliability.’

Clin. Biomech. 14 (1999): 287–290

16.

de Groot

J. H.

Brand

‘A three-dimensional regression model of the shoulder rhythm.’

Clin. Biomech. 16 (2001): 735–743

17.

Jones

Holt

C. A.

Bowers

‘Movement of the shoulder complex: the development of a measurement technique based on proposed ISB standards.’ In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on 3D motion analysis

18.

Lovern

Evans

R. O.

Jones

Evans

S. L.

Stroud

Holt

C. A.

‘Functional assessment of the shoulder complex using 3D motion analysis techniques.’ In Proceedings of the 16th Congress of the European Society of Biomechanics, Lucerne, Switzerland 2008, paper 424 (European Society of Biomechanics, Strasbourg).

19.

Qualisys, Optical motion capture — accurate tracking of any kind of motion 2009, available from http://www.qualisys.com (last accessed 23 January 2009).

20.

van der Helm

F. C. T.

Veeger

H. E. J.

Makhsous

Van Roy

Anglin

Nagels

Karduna

A. R.

McQuade

Wang

Werner

F. W.

Buchholz

‘ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion — part II: Shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.’

J. Biomech. 38 (2005): 981–992

21.

Meskers

C. G. M.

van der Helm

F. C. T.

Rozendaal

L. A.

Rozing

P. M.

‘In vivo estimation of the glenohumeral joint rotation centre from scapula bony landmarks by linear regression.’

J. Biomech. 31 (1997): 93–96

22.

Veeger

H. E. J.

van der Helm

F. C. T.

‘Shoulder function: The perfect compromise between mobility and stability.’

J. Biomech. 40 (2007): 2119–2129

23.

Karduna

McClure

Michener

L. A.

Sennett

‘Dynamic measurements of three-dimensional scapular kinematics: A validation study.’

Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng 123 (2) (2001): 184–190