New material combinations and designs of artificial hip implants are being introduced in an effort to improve proprioception and functional longevity. Larger joints in particular are being developed to improve joint stability, and it is thought that these larger implants will be more satisfactory for younger and more physically active patients. The study detailed here used a hip friction simulator to assess the friction and lubrication properties of large-diameter hip bearings of metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-reinforced-polymer couplings. Joints of different diameters were evaluated to determine what effect, if any, bearing diameter had on lubrication. In addition, the effects of lubricant type are considered, using carboxymethyl cellulose and bovine calf serum, and the physiological lubricant is shown to be considerably more effective at reducing friction. The frictional studies showed that the metal-on-metal joints worked under a mixed lubrication regime, producing similar friction factor values to each other. The addition of bovine calf serum (BCS) reduced the friction. The ceramic-on-reinforced-polymer samples were shown to operate with high friction factors and mixed lubrication. When tested with BCS, the larger-diameter bearings showed a decrease in friction compared with the smaller-size bearings, and the addition of BCS resulted in an increase in friction, unlike the metal-on-metal system. The study demonstrated that the component's diameter had little or no influence on the lubrication and friction of the large bearing combinations tested.
CharnleyJ.‘Arthroplasty of the hip, a new operation.’Lancet (1) (1961): 1129–1132
2.
KobayashiS.EftekharN. S.TerayamaK.JoshiR. P.‘Comparative study of total hip arthroplasty between younger and older patients.’Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.339 (1997): 140–151
3.
BrockettC. L.WilliamsS.JinZ. M.IsaacG.FisherJ.‘A comparison of friction in 28 mm conventional and 55 mm resurfacing metal-on-metal hip replacements.’Proc. IMechE, Part J: J. Engineering Tribology221 (J3) (2007): 391–398 DOI: 10.1243/13506501JET234.
4.
FreemanM. A.‘Some anatomical and mechanical considerations relevant to the surface replacement of the femoral head.’Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.134 (1978): 19–24
5.
GandheA.GroverM.‘(i) Head size, does it matter?’Current Orthop.22 (3) (2008): 155–164
6.
ThompsonM. S.Northmore-BallM. D.TannerK. E.‘FEA in the design of a novel hip resurfacing prosthesis.’ In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Society of Biomechanics, Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland, Dublin, 2000.
7.
McKeeG. K.Watson-FarrarJ.‘Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee—Farrar prosthesis.’J. Bone and Joint Surg. Br.48 (2) (1966): 245–259
8.
McKellopH.ParkS. H.ChiesaR.DoornP.LuB.NormandP.GrigorisP.AmstutzH. ‘In vivo wear of 3 types of metal on metal hip prostheses during 2 decades of use.’ Clin. Orthop. 329S (1996): S128-S140.
9.
AugustA. C.AldamC. H.PynsentP. B.‘The McKee—Farrar hip arthroplasty. A long-term study.’J. Bone and Joint Surg. Br.68 (4) (1986): 520–527
10.
JacobssonS. A.DjerfK.WahlstromO.‘20-year results of McKee—Farrar versus Charnley prosthesis.’Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.329 (1996): S60–68.
11.
SchmalzriedT. P.PetersP. C.MaurerB. T.BragdonC. R.HarrisW. H.‘Long-duration metal-metal total hip arthroplasties with low wear of the articulating surfaces.’J. Arthroplasty11 (1996): 322–331
12.
LougheadJ. M.StarksI.ChesneyD.MatthewsJ. N. S.McCaskieA. W.HollandJ. P.‘Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. A comparison with hybrid total hip arthroplasty.’J. Bone and Joint Surg. Br.88 (1) (2006): 31–34
13.
AnissianH. L.StarkA.GustafsonA.GoodV.ClarkeI. C.‘Metal-on-metal bearing in hip prosthesis generates 100-fold less wear debris than metal-on-polyethylene.’Acta Orthop. Scand.70 (6) (1999): 578–582
14.
SmithS. L.DowsonD.GoldsmithA. A. J.‘The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine215 (H2) (2001): 161–170 DOI: 10.1243/0954411011533724.
15.
GoldsmithA. A.DowsonD.IsaacG. H.LancasterJ. G.‘A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine214 (H1) (2000): 39–47 DOI: 10.1243/0954411001535228.
16.
DowsonD.HardakerC.FlettM.IsaacG. H.‘A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part II: Design.’J. Arthroplasty19 (8, Suppl. 3) (2004): 124–130
17.
CiperaW. M.MedleyJ. B.‘A friction study of cobalt-based alloys for metal-metal hip implants.’ In Proceedings of the 5th World Biomaterials Congress, Toronto, Canada, 1996, p. 781.
18.
ScholesS. C.UnsworthA.‘Comparison of friction and lubrication of different hip prostheses.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine214 (H1) (2000): 49–57 DOI: 10.1243/0954411001535237.
19.
DowsonD.McNieC. M.GoldsmithA. A.‘Direct experimental evidence of lubrication in a metal-on-metal total hip replacement tested in a joint simulator.’Proc. IMechE, Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science214 (C1) (2000): 75–86 DOI: 10.1243/0954406001522822.
20.
UnsworthA.VassiliouK.ElfickA. P. D.ScholesS. C.McMinnD.BandT. ‘Fluid film lubrication of metal-on-metal hip joints — fact or fiction.’ In the Proceedings of ISTA, San Francisco, California, 2003.
21.
ScholesS. C.UnsworthA.van KampenM. ‘The lubrication regime in a metal-on-metal total hip replacement.’ International Conference of Engineers and Surgeons Joined at the Hip, IMechE, 2002.
22.
BrockettC. L.HarperP.WilliamsS.IsaacG. H.Dwyer-JoyceR. S.ZhongminJ.FisherJ.‘The influence of clearance on friction, lubrication and squeaking in large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements.’J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med.19 (2007): 1575–1579
23.
WimmerM. A.NassuttR.SprecherC.LoosJ.TagerG.FischerA.‘Investigation on stick phenomena in metal-on-metal hip joints after resting periods.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine220 (H2) (2006): 219–227 DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM117.
24.
ScholesS. C.UnsworthA.‘The wear properties of CFR-PEEK-OPTIMA articulating against ceramic assessed on a multidirectional pin-on-plate machine.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine221 (H3) (2007): 281–289 DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM117.
25.
ScholesS. C.InmanI. A.UnsworthA.JonesE.‘Tribological assessment of a flexible carbon-fibre-reinforced poly(ether-ether-ketone) acetabular cup articulating against an alumina femoral head.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine222 (H3) (2008): 273–283 DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM334.
26.
LatifA. M. H.MehatsA.ElcocksM.RushtonN.FieldR. E.JonesE.‘Pre-clinical studies to validate the MITCH PCRTM Cup: a flexible and anatomically shaped acetabular component with novel bearing characteristics.’J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. in Med.19 (4) (2007): 1729–1736
27.
FieldR. E.CroninM. D.SinghP. J.BurtenshawC.RushtonN.‘Bone remodelling around the cambridge cup. A DEXA study of 50 hips over 2 years.’Acta Orthop.77 (5) (2006): 726–732
28.
FlanneryM.JonesE.BirkinshawC.‘Analysis of wear and friction of total knee replacements, Part II: Friction and lubrication as a function of wear.’Wear265 (7–8) (2008): 1009–1016
29.
UnsworthA.‘The effects of lubrication in hip joint prostheses.’Phys. Med. Biol.23 (2) (1978): 253–268
30.
GoreT. A.HigginsonG. R.KornbergR. E.‘Some evidence of squeeze-film lubrication in hip prostheses.’Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine10 (2) (1981): 89–95
31.
LinnF. C.‘Lubrication of animal joints. I. The arthrotripsometer.’J. Bone and Joint Surg. Am.49 (6) (1967): 1079–1098
32.
LinnF. C.‘Lubrication of animal joints. II. The mechanism.’J. Biomechanics1 (3) (1968): 193–205
33.
StribeckR.‘Die wesenlichen Eigenchalfen der Gleit- und Rollenlager.’Z. Deutsch. Ing.46 (1902): 1341–1348
34.
HamrockB. J.DowsonD.‘Elastohydrodynamic lubrication of elliptical contacts for materials of low elastic-modulus I — fully flooded conjunction.’Trans. ASME, J. Lubrication Technol.100 (2) (1978): 236–245
35.
DowsonD.‘New joints for the Millennium: Wear control in total replacement hip joints.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine215 (H4) (2001): 335–358 DOI: 10.1243/0954411011535939.
36.
JohnsonK. L.GreenwoodJ. A.PoonS. Y.‘A simple theory of asperity contact in elastohydro-dynamic lubrication.’Wear19 (1) (1972): 91–108
37.
ScholesS. C.SmithS. L.AshH. E.UnsworthA.‘The lubrication and friction of conventional UHMWPE, novel compliant layer, and hard bearing surfaces for use in total hip prostheses.’ In Friction, lubrication and wear of artificial joints (Ed. HutchingsI. M.), 2003, pp. 59–74 (Professional Engineering PublishingLondon).
38.
ScholesS. C.UnsworthA.GoldsmithA. A.‘A frictional study of total hip joint replacements.’Phys. in Med. and Biol.45 (12) (2000): 3721–3735
39.
UnsworthA.PearcyM. J.WhiteE. F.WhiteG.‘Frictional properties of artificial hip joints.’Engng in Med.17 (3) (1988): 101–104
40.
WilliamsS.StewartT. D.InghamE.StoneM.FisherJ.‘Metal-on-metal bearing wear with different swing phase loads.’J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B: Appl. Biomater. 70B (2004): 233–239
41.
ScholesS. C.UnsworthA.‘The effects of proteins on the friction and lubrication of artificial joints.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine220 (H6) (2006): 687–693 DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM21.
42.
BrockettC.WilliamsS.JinZ.IsaacG.FisherJ.‘Friction of total hip replacements with different bearings and loading conditions.’J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B: Appl. Biomater. 81B (2007): 508–515
43.
MishinaH.KojimaM.‘Changes in human serum albumin on arthroplasty frictional surfaces.’Wear265 (5–6) (2008): 655–663
44.
ChenX. M.JinZ. M.FisherJ.‘Effect of albumin adsorption on friction between artificial joint material.’Proc. IMechE, Part J: J. Engineering Tribology222 (J3) (2008): 513–521 DOI: 10.1243/13506501JET371.
