Hig hintensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been applied for drug delivery in various disease conditions. Delivery of antibacterial-nanoparticles into dental hard tissues may open up new avenues in the treatment of dental infections. However, the basic mechanism of bubble dynamics, its characterization, and working parameters for effective delivery of nanoparticles, warrants further understanding. This study was conducted to highlight the basic concept of HIFU and the associated bubble dynamics for the delivery of nanoparticles. Characterization experiments to deliver micro-scale particles into simulated tubular channels, activity of ultrasonic bubbles, and pressure measurement inside the HIFU system were conducted. Subsequently, experiments were carried out to test the ability of HIFU to deliver nanoparticles into human dentine using field emission scanning electron micrographs (FESEM) and elemental dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX). The characterization experiments showed that the bubbles collapsing at the opening of tubular channels were able to propel particles along their whole length. The pressure measured showed sufficient negative and positive pressure suggesting that the bubble grew to a certain size before collapsing, thus enabling the particles to be pushed. The FESEM and EDX analysis highlighted the ability of HIFU to deliver nanoparticles deep within the dentinal tubules. This study highlighted the characteristics and the mechanism involved of the bubbles generated by the HIFU and their capability to deliver nanoparticles.
KochS.PohlP.CobetU.RainovN. G.‘Ultrasound enhancement of liposome-mediated cell transfection is caused by cavitation effects.’Ultrasound Med. Biol.2000, 26, 897–903.
6.
MalcolmA. L.Ter HaarG. R.‘Ablation of tissue volumes using high intensity focused ultrasound.’Ultrasound Med. Biol.1996, 22, 659–669.
7.
XuZ.FowlkesJ. B.RothmanE. D.LevinA. M.CainC. A.‘Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: The role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity.’J. Acoust. Soc. Am.2005, 117, 424–435.
8.
RichmanM. J.‘The use of ultrasonics in root canal therapy and root resection.’J. Dent. Med.1957, 12, 12–18.
9.
RepacholiM. H.BenwellD. A. (Eds) Essentials of medical ultrasound: a practical introduction to the principles, techniques, and biomedical applications1982 (Humana Press, New Jersey).
10.
LairdW. R.WalmsleyA. D.‘Ultrasound in dentistry. Part 1-Biophysical interaction.’J. Dent.1991, 19, 14–17.
11.
TeplitskyP. E.ChenailB. L.MackB.MachneeC. H.‘Endodontic irrigation - a comparison of endosonic and syringe delivery systems.’Int. Endod. J.1987, 20, 233–241.
12.
PlotinoG.PameijerC. H.GrandeN. M.SommaF.‘Ultrasonics in endodontics: A review of the literature.’J. Endod.2007, 33, 81–95.
13.
PariniM. R., Biofilm removal using bubbles and sound. Master thesis, Brigham Young University2005.
14.
van der SluisL. W.VersluisM.WuM. K.WesselinkP. R.‘Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: A review of the literature.’Int. Endod. J.2007, 40, 415–426.
15.
SchevenB.MillardJ.CooperP.LeaS.WalmsleyA.SmithA.‘Short-term in vitro effects of low frequency ultrasound on odontoblast-like cells.’Ultrasound Med. Biol.2003, 33, 1475–1482.
16.
BorkentB.AroraM.OhlC. D.de JongN.VersluisM.LohseD.MorchK. A.KlaseboerE.KhooB. C.‘The acceleration of solid particles subjected to cavitation nucleation.’J. Fluid Mech.2008, 610, 157–182.
17.
ChanA. H.FujimotoV. Y.MooreD. E.MartinR. W.VaezyS.‘An image-guided high intensity focused ultrasound device for uterine fibroids treatment.’Med. Phys.2002, 29, 2611–2640.
18.
ChapelonJ. Y.RibaultM.VernierF.SouchonR.GeletA‘Treatment of localised prostate cancer with transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound.’Eur. J. Ultrasound.1999, 9, 31–38.
19.
NinetJ.RoquesX.SeitelbergerR.DevilleC.PomarJ. L.RobinJ.JegadenO.WellensF.WolnerE.VedrinneC.GottardiR.OrritJ.BillesM. A.HoffmanD. A.CoxJ. L.CampsaurG. L.‘Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with off-pump, epicardial, high-intensity focused ultrasound: Results of a multicenter trial.’J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.2005, 130, 803–809.
LeaS. C.PriceG. J.WalmsleyA. D.‘A study to determine whether cavitation occurs around dental ultrasonic scaling instruments.’Ultrason. Sonochem.2005, 12, 233–236.
22.
FongS. W.KlaseboerE.TuranganC. K.KhooB. C.HungK. C.‘Numerical analysis of a gas bubble near bio-materials in an ultrasound field.’Ultrasound Med. Biol.2006, 32, 925–942.
23.
HillC. R.BamberJ. C.ter HaarG. R. (Eds) Physical principles of medical ultrasonics2004 (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex).
24.
MartinH.CunninghamW.‘Endosonics - the ultrasonic synergistic system of endodontics.’Endod. Dent. Traumatol.1985, 1(6), 201–206.
25.
WalmsleyA. D.‘Ultrasound and root canal treatment: The need for scientific evaluation.’Int. Endod. J.1987, 20, 105–111.
26.
AhmadM.Pitt FordT. R.CrumL. A.WaltonA. J.‘Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: Acoustic cavitation and its relevance.’J. Endod.1988, 14, 486–493.
27.
AhmadM.Pitt FordT. R.CrumL. A.‘Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: An insight into the mechanisms involved.’J. Endod.1987, 13, 93–101.
28.
SequeiraP.FedorowiczZ.NasserM.PedrazziV.‘Ultrasonic versus hand instrumentation for orthograde root canal treatment of permanent teeth.’Cochrane Database. Syst. Rev.2007, 17, CD006384.
29.
KakehashiS.StanleyH. R.FitzgeraldR. J.‘The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats.’Oral Surg. Oral. Med. Oral Pathol.1965, 20, 340–349.
30.
SundqvistG.Bacteriological studies of necrotic dental pulps. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Umea, Sweden1976.
31.
NairP. N.HenryS.CanoV.VeraJ.‘Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic treatment.’Oral Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol.2005, 99, 231–252.
32.
GeorgeS.KishenA.‘The role of environmental changes on monospecies biofilm formation on root canal wall by enterococcus faecalis.’J. Endod.2005, 31, 867–872.
33.
ShresthaA.FongS. W.KhooB. C.KishenA.‘Delivery of antibacterial nanoparticles into dentinal tubules using high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).’J. Endod.2009, 35, 1028–1033.
34.
SchilkeR.LissonJ. A.BaussO.GeurtsenW.‘Comparison of the number and diameter of dentinal tubules in human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscopic investigation.’Arch. Oral Biol.2000, 45, 355–361.
35.
KishenA.ShiZ.ShresthaA.NeohK. G.‘An investigation on the antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of cationic nanoparticulates for root canal disinfection.’J. Endod.2008, 34, 1515–1520.
36.
ShiZ.NeohK. G.KangE. T.WangW.‘Antibacterial and mechanical properties of bone cement impregnated with Chitosan nanoparticles.’Biomaterials2006, 27, 2440–2449.
37.
PanY.LiY. J.ZhaoH. Y.ZhengJ. M.XuH.WeiG.HaoJ. S.CuiF. D.‘Bioadhesive polysaccharide in protein delivery system: Chitosan nanoparticles improve the intestinal absorption of insulin in vivo.’Int. J. Pharm.2002, 249, 139–147.
38.
PorteroA.Remunan-LopezC.CriadoM. T.AlonsoM. J.‘Reacetylated chitosan microspheres for controlled delivery of anti-microbial agents to the gastric mucosa.’J. Microencapsul.2002, 19, 797–809.
39.
JungB. O.KimC. H.ChoiK. S.LeeY. M.KimJ.J.‘Preparation of amphiphilic Chitosan and their antimicrobial activities.’J. Appl. Polym. Sci.1999, 72, 1713–1719.
40.
MuzzarelliR.TarsiR.FilippiniO.GiovanettiE.BiaginiG.VaraldoP. E.‘Antimicrobial properties of N-carboxybutyl chitosan.’Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.1990, 34, 2019–2033.
