Disc degeneration and muscle dysfunction are common spinal degenerations in the elderly. This in vitro study was carried out to investigate the effects of these two degenerative changes on spinal stability. The stability of nine porcine cervical spines (C2–T1) with mechanically simulated cervical muscles (sternocleidomastoid (SCM), splenius capitis (SPL), semispinalis capitis (SSC)) was tested before and after experiment-induced disc degeneration. The patterns of muscle recruitments included: no muscle recruitment, normal recruitment of SCM/SPL/SSC, and SCM/SPL/SSC muscle dysfunctions. The neutral zone (NZ) and the range of motion (ROM) in the sagittal plane were measured to determine spinal stability. The results showed that the NZ and the ROM of a degenerative spine were larger than those of an intact spine under no muscle recruitment, but not under muscle recruitments. For both intact and degenerative spines, the NZ and the ROM were greatest under no muscle recruitment, followed by SSC dysfunction, SCM dysfunction, and SPL dysfunction, and smallest under normal muscle recruitment. In conclusion, muscle recruitments stabilize both intact and degenerative cervical spines, while dysfunctional muscles do not maintain stability efficiently as normal muscles do. Thus, spinal stability is more significantly affected by muscle dysfunction than by disc degeneration. Muscle training is suggested for the elderly with spinal degeneration to improve stability.
LehtoI.J.TerttiM.O.KomuM.E.PaajanenH.E.TuominenJ.KormanoM.J.Age-related MRI changes at 0.1 T in cervical discs in asymptomatic subjects. Neuroradiology, 1994, 36(1), 49–53.
2.
MatsumotoM.FujimuraY.SuzukiN.NishiY.NakamuraM.YabeY.ShigaH.MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 1998, 80(1), 19–24.
3.
FujiwaraA.LimT.H.AnH.S.TanakaN.JeonC.H.AnderssonG.B.HaughtonV.M.The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine, 2000, 25(23), 3036–3044.
4.
BuckwalterJ.A.Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Spine, 1995, 20(11), 1307–1314.
5.
AntoniouJ.SteffenT.NelsonF.WinterbottomN.HollanderA.P.PooleR.A.AebiM.AliniM.The human lumbar intervertebral disc evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration. J. Clin. Invest., 1996, 98(4), 996–1003.
6.
HanS.M.LeeS.Y.ChoM.H.LeeJ.-K.Disc hydration measured by magnetic resonance imaging in relation to its compressive stiffness in rat models. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2001, 215(5), 497–501. DOI 10.1243/0954411011536091.
7.
NishizawaS.YokoyamaT.YokotaN.KanekoM.High cervical disc lesions in elderly patients - presentation and surgical approach. Acta Neurochir. (Wien), 1999, 141(2),119–126.
8.
LeeC.E.McArdleA.GriffithsR.D.The role of hormones, cytokines and heat shock proteins during age-related muscle loss. Clin. Nutr., 2007, 26(5), 524–534.
9.
van der DonkJ.SchoutenJ.S.PasschierJ.van RomundeL.K.ValkenburgH.A.The associations of neck pain with radiological abnormalities of the cervical spine and personality traits in a general population. J. Rheumatol., 1991, 18(12), 1884–1889.
10.
MarchioriD.M.HendersonC.N.A cross-sectional study correlating cervical radiographic degenerative findings to pain and disability. Spine, 1996, 21(23), 2747–2751.
11.
PanjabiM.M.Clinical spinal instability and low back pain. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 2003, 13(4), 371–379.
12.
AdamsM.A.DolanP.HuttonW.C.The lumbar spine in backward bending. Spine, 1988, 13(9), 1019–1026.
13.
LeeP.J.RogersE.L.GranataK.P.Active trunk stiffness increases with co-contraction. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 2006, 16(1), 51–57.
14.
RohlmannA.ZanderT.SchmidtH.WilkeH.J.BergmannG.Analysis of the influence of disc degeneration on the mechanical behaviour of a lumbar motion segment using the finite element method. J. Biomech., 2006, 39(13), 2484–2490.
15.
DaiL.Disc degeneration and cervical instability. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging with radiography. Spine, 1998, 23(16), 1734–1738.
16.
ReevesN.P.NarendraK.S.CholewickiJ.Spine stability: The six blind men and the elephant. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon), 2007, 22(3), 266–274.
17.
PanjabiM.M.A hypothesis of chronic back pain: Ligament subfailure injuries lead to muscle control dysfunction. Eur. Spine J., 2006, 15(5), 668–676.
18.
TanakaN.AnH.S.LimT.H.FujiwaraA.JeonC.H.HaughtonV.M.The relationship between disc degeneration and flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine J., 2001, 1(1), 47–56.
19.
PanjabiM.M.KragM.H.ChungT.Q.Effects of disc injury on mechanical behavior of the human spine. Spine, 1984, 9(7), 707–713.
20.
PanjabiM.M.AbumiK.DuranceauJ.OxlandT.Spinal stability and intersegmental muscle forces. A biomechanical model. Spine, 1989, 14(2), 194–200.
21.
WilkeH.J.WolfS.ClaesL.E.ArandM.WiesendA.Stability increase of the lumbar spine with different muscle groups. A biomechanical in vitro study. Spine, 1995, 20(2), 192–198.
22.
VasavadaA.N.LiS.DelpS.L.Influence of muscle morphometry and moment arms on the moment-generating capacity of human neck muscles. Spine, 1998, 23(4), 412–422.
23.
ChengC.H.ChenT.Y.KuoY.W.WangJ.L.The mechanics of cervical muscle recruitment on cervical spine stability - a biomechanical in vitro study using porcine model.’J. Mech., 2008, 24(1), 63–68.
24.
ChengC.H.ChenP.J.KuoY.W.WangJ.L.The mechanism of compensation of cervical muscle dysfunction on the spine stability. J. Chin. Inst. Engrs, 2008, 31(4), 605–613.
25.
FreiH.OxlandT.R.RathonyiG.C.NolteL.P.The effect of nucleotomy on lumbar spine mechanics in compression and shear loading. Spine, 2001, 26(19), 2080–2089.
26.
GoelV.K.NishiyamaK.WeinsteinJ.N.LiuY.K.Mechanical properties of lumbar spinal motion segments as affected by partial disc removal. Spine, 1986, 11(10), 1008–1012.
27.
BrownS.H.PotvinJ.R.Constraining spine stability levels in an optimization model leads to the prediction of trunk muscle cocontraction and improved spine compression force estimates. J. Biomech., 2005, 38(4), 745–754.
28.
PanjabiM.M.CriscoJ.J.VasavadaA.OdaT.CholewickiJ.NibuK.ShinE.Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. Spine, 2001, 26(24), 2692–2700.
29.
RousseauM.A.UlrichJ.A.BassE.C.RodriguezA.G.LiuJ.J.LotzJ.C.Stab incision for inducing intervertebral disc degeneration in the rat. Spine, 2007, 32(1),17–24.
30.
NatarajanR.N.AnderssonG.B.PatwardhanA.G.VermaS.Effect of annular incision type on the change in biomechanical properties in a herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. J. Biomech. Engng, 2002, 124(2), 229–236.
31.
AntoniouJ.MwaleF.DemersC.N.BeaudoinG.GoswamiT.AebiM.AliniM.Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of enzymatically induced degradation of the nucleus pulposus of intervertebral discs. Spine, 2006, 31(14), 1547–1554.
32.
OliphantD.FrayneR.KawchukG.A new method of creating intervertebral disc disruption of various grades. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon), 2006, 21(1), 21–25.
33.
CallaghanJ.P.McGillS.M.Intervertebral disc herniation: Studies on a porcine model exposed to highly repetitive flexion/extension motion with compressive force. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon), 2001, 16(1), 28–37.
34.
HouT.S.TuK.Y.XuY.K.ZhangW.M.WangH.C.WangD.L.Effect of partial discectomy on the stability of the lumbar spine. A study of kinematics. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.), 1990, 103(5), 396–399.
35.
MeakinJ.R.RedpathT.W.HukinsD.W.The effect of partial removal of the nucleus pulposus from the intervertebral disc on the response of the human annulus fibrosus to compression. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon), 2001, 16(2), 121–128.
36.
KettlerA.HartwigE.SchultheissM.ClaesL.WilkeH.J.Mechanically simulated muscle forces strongly stabilize intact and injured upper cervical spine specimens. J. Biomech., 2002, 35(3), 339–346.
37.
ArjmandN.Shirazi-AdlA.Sensitivity of kinematics-based model predictions to optimization criteria in static lifting tasks. Med. Engng Phys., 2006, 28(6), 504–514.
38.
MayerF.BaurH.MullerS.HirschmullerA.BergA.DickhuthH.H.Current views on the prevention of ailments of the musculoskeletal system through muscle strengthening programs. MMW Fortschr. Med., 2004, 146(27-28), 31–33.
39.
HazellT.KennoK.JakobiJ.Functional benefit of power training for older adults. J. Aging Phys. Act., 2007, 15(3), 349–359.
40.
FallaD.JullG.HodgesP.W.Feedforward activity of the cervical flexor muscles during voluntary arm movements is delayed in chronic neck pain. Exp. Brain Res., 2004, 157(1), 43–48.
41.
FallaD.RainoldiA.MerlettiR.JullG.Myoelectric manifestations of sternocleidomastoid and anterior scalene muscle fatigue in chronic neck pain patients. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2003, 114(3), 488–495.
42.
JullG.KristjanssonE.Dall'AlbaP.Impairment in the cervical flexors: A comparison of whiplash and insidious onset neck pain patients. Man. Ther., 2004, 9(2), 89–94.
43.
EssendropM.AndersenT.B.SchibyeB.Increase in spinal stability obtained at levels of intra-abdominal pressure and back muscle activity realistic to work situations. Appl. Ergon., 2002, 33(5), 471–476.
44.
SladeS.C.KeatingJ.L.Trunk-strengthening exercises for chronic low back pain: A systematic review. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther., 2006, 29(2), 163–173.
45.
van TulderM.MalmivaaraA.EsmailR.KoesB.Exercise therapy for low back pain: A systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine, 2000, 25(21), 2784–2796.
46.
BusscherI.PloegmakersJ.J.VerkerkeG.J.VeldhuizenA.G.Comparative anatomical dimensions of the complete human and porcine spine. Eur. Spine J., 2010, 19(7), 1104–1114.
47.
WheeldonJ.A.PintarF.A.KnowlesS.YoganandanN.Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine. J. Biomech., 2006, 39(2), 375–380.
48.
MimuraM.PanjabiM.M.OxlandT.R.CriscoJ.J.YamamotoI.VasavadaA.Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine, 1994, 19(12), 1371–1380.
49.
ZhaoF.PollintineP.HoleB.D.DolanP.AdamsM.A.Discogenic origins of spinal instability. Spine, 2005, 30(23), 2621–2630.
