Some of the more significant thermodynamic methods to improve the efficiency of coal-based electricity generation technologies are surveyed and examined, focusing on minor practical improvements that can be undertaken with limited effort and cost. Two categories of methods are examined. The first is efficiency-improvement techniques such as better maintenance and control, application of exergy and related analysis methods, and use of computer-based simulation, analysis, optimization, and design. The second category includes efficiency-improvement measures for devices, including steam generators, condensers, reheaters, and regenerative feedwater heaters. A case study is presented. It is concluded, for coal-fired electricity generation plants, that (i) many useful techniques exist (especially exergy analysis) and should be used for identifying and designing efficiency improvements, and (ii) the many possible measures to improve efficiency should be weighed against other factors and where appropriate implemented. Where larger efficiency increases are sought, improvements applicable over longer time frames and of a broader nature should be investigated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CorcoranE.Cleaning up coal. Sci. Amer., 1991, 264(5), 106–116.
2.
LundbergG.The future of fossil fuels in power plants. A Future for Energy: Proc. of the Florence World Energy Research Symposium, Firenze, Italy, 1990, pp. 3–20.
3.
AhlgrenR. C. E.A steam system primer: High pressure system steams. ASHRAE J., 1994, 36, 44–51.
4.
MakansiJ.Fluidized bed boilers. Power, 1991, 135(3), 15–33.
5.
SmithD. J.FBC: Is it the answer for new coal fired capacity. Power Engng, 1991, 94(2), 2–30.
6.
AntoniniA.PinamontiP.Possible use of pressurized fluidized bed combustion for repowering of thermoelectric power plants. Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on Turbomachinery, Combined-Cycle Technologies and Cogeneration, IGTI Vol. 1, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Montreux, Switzerland, 1988, pp. 117–124.
7.
MakansiJ.From IGCC emerges a holistic approach to coal-based plant. Power, 1997, May/June issue, 41–46.
Gas repowering breathes new life into old coal-fired unit. Power, 1996, April issue, 90–92.
10.
LezuoA.RiedleK.WittchowE.Tendencies in the development of coal-fired power stations. Brennstoff-Waerme-Kraft, 1989, 41(1–2), 13–22.
11.
SmockR.Repowering old plants gains favour. Power Engng, 1990, 94(5), 25–27.
12.
SnowG. C.MaibodiM.Feasibility analysis of advanced technology repowering of coal-fired utility plants. Proc. Joint ASME/IEEE Power Generation Conference, Dallas, 1989, pp. 22–26.
13.
BoeckerD.A new process for coal drying in combined power stations using lignite. Brennstoff-Waerme-Kraft, 1989, 41(5), 231–234.
14.
LeithnerR.Improving efficiency of brown coal fired power stations. Proc. Int. Conf. on Energy Systems and Ecology (ENSEC1993), Cracow, Poland, 5–9 July 1993, pp. 483–490.
15.
ValentiM.Upgrading the old turbine. Mech. Engng, 1999, 121(2), 44–48.
16.
VierstraS.Low-NOx burner retrofit reduces major boiler alterations. Power, 1995, February issue, 48–50.
17.
HabibM. A.SaidS. A. M.Al-ZaharnaI.Optimization of reheat pressures in thermal power plants. Energy, 1995, 20, 555–565.
18.
MankowskiS.DzierzgowskiM.WiszniewskiA.ZwierzchowskiR.Method for increasing boiler performance, improvement of combustion process, and reducing energy losses for the coal stoker-fired boilers. In Thermodynamics and the Design, Analysis, and Improvement of Energy Systems (Ed. KraneR. J.), 1994, pp. 35–40 (AES), New York.
19.
SilvestriG. J.BannisterR. L.FujikawaT.HizumeA.Optimization of advanced steam condition power plants. J. Engng Gas Turbines Power, 1992, 114, 612–620.
20.
YaoK.Boiler combustion performance comparing different fuels. In Thermodynamics and the Design, Analysis, and Improvement of Energy System (Ed. KraneR. J.) 1994, pp. 7–14 (AES), New York.
21.
ValentiM.Pouring on steam. Mech. Engng, 1996, 118(2), 71–74.
22.
MeyerR.Repowering of coal-fired stations moves forward. Power, 1995, October issue, 25–29.
Searching for steam system efficiency. Plant Engng, 1996, December issue, 64–68.
28.
DincerI.Al-MuslimH.Thermodynamic analysis of reheat cycle steam power plants. Int. J. Energy Res., 2001, 25(8), 727–739.
29.
FischerD. W.Searching for steam system efficiency. Plant Engng, 1996, 50, 64–68.
30.
HabibM. A.SaidS. A. M.Al-ZaharnaI.Thermodynamic optimization of reheat regenerative thermal power plants. Appl. Energy, 1999, 63, 17–34.
31.
DunbarW. R.GaggioliR. A.LiorN.The component equations of energy and exergy. In Thermodynamics and Energy Systems: Fundamentals, 1991, pp. 21–30 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).
32.
DunbarW. R.LiorN.A breakdown of the exergy losses in combustion. A Future for Energy: Proc. of the Florence World Energy Research Symposium, Firenze, Italy, 1990, pp. 347–358.
33.
MoranM. J.Second law analysis. What is the state of the art? A Future for Energy: Proc of the Florence World Energy Research Symposium, Firenze, Italy, 1990, pp. 249–260.
34.
MoranM. J.Availability Analysis: A Guide to Efficient Energy Use, revised edition, 1989 (ASME, New York).
35.
BejanA.Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics, 2nd edition, 1997 (John Wiley and Sons, New York).
36.
CengelY. A.BolesM. A.Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 1989 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
37.
MoranM. J.SciubbaE.Exergy analysis: Principles and practice. J. Engng Gas Turbines Power, 1994, 116, 285–290.
RosenM. A.Second law analysis: Approaches and implications. Int. J. Energy Res., 1999, 23(5), 415–429.
40.
RosenM. A.Design for energy efficiency and selection. In Greener Manufacturing and Operations: From Design to Delivery and Back, (Ed. SarkisJ.), Chapter 11, 2001, pp. 161–177 (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield).
41.
GaggioliR. A.SamaA. D.QianS.Al-SayedM.Integration of a new process into an existing site: A case study in the application of exergy analysis. J. Engng Gas Turbines Power, 1991, 113, 170–180.
42.
SrivastavaA.Second law (exergy) analysis of various types of coal. Energy Convers. Manage., 1988, 28(2), 117–121.
McCauleyJ. F.How second law analysis helps optimize maintenance budgeting: A fundamental example of a leaking steam trap. Energy Engng, 1991, 88(1), 70–75.
45.
SteccoS. S.TrebbiG.BidiniG.ManfridaG.RossiC.Experiences in exergy analysis of power plants. In Thermodynamic Analysis and Improvement of Energy Systems (Eds RuixianCaiMoranM. J.), 1989, pp. 303–309 (Pergamon, New York).
46.
SteccoS. S.ManfridaG.Exergy analysis of compression and expansion processes. Energy, 1986, 11, 573–577.
47.
NishioN.ItohJ.ShirokoK.UmedaT.A thermodynamic approach to steam-power system design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 1980, 19, 306–312.
48.
CornelissenR. L.HirsG. G.Exergetic optimization of a heat exchanger Energy Convers. Manage., 1997, 38, 1567–1576.
49.
HabibM. A.ZubairS. M.Second law based thermodynamic analysis of regenerative-reheat Rankine-cycle power plants. Energy, 1992, 17, 295–301.
50.
HabibM. A.SaidS. A. M.Al-BagawiJ. J.Thermodynamic performance analysis of the Ghazlan power plant. Energy, 1995, 20, 1121–1130.
51.
RosenM. A.Energy-and exergy-based comparison of coal-fired and nuclear steam power plants. Exergy, An Int. J., 2001, 1(3), 180–192.
52.
TsatsaronisG.TawfikT.LinL.GallaspyD. T.Exergy analysis of an IGCC design configuration for plant Wansley. In Analysis and Design of Energy Systems: Thermodynamic Analysis of Industrial Processes (Ed. BajuraR. A.), 1989, pp. 21–29 (ASME, New York).
53.
TsatsaronisG.TawfikT.LinL.GallaspyD. T.Exergetic comparison of two KRW-based IGCC power plants. In Second Law Analysis: Industrial and Environmental Applications (Ed. ReistadG. M.), 1991, pp. 7–18 (ASME, New York).
54.
TsatsaronisG.PisaJ.LinL.TawfikT.Optmization of an IGCC power plant (Parts I and II). In Thermodynamics and the Design, Analysis, and Improvement of Energy Systems (Ed. BoehmR. F.), 1992, pp. 37–67 (ASME, New York).
55.
RosenM. A.Assessment of an integrated coal-gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) power plant using energy and exergy analyses. In Thermodynamics and the Design, Analysis and Improvement of Energy Systems (Ed. BoehmR. F.), 1992, pp. 101–109(ASME, New York).
56.
HuangF. F.NaumowiczT.Overall performance evaluation of combined-cycle gas-steam power plants based on first-law as well as second-law analysis. In A Future for Energy (Eds SteccoS. S.MoranM. J.), 1990, pp. 681–694(Pergamon, Oxford, Great Britain).
57.
GrimaldiC. N.BidiniG.Using exergy analyses on circulating fluidized bed combustors. A Future for Energy: Proc. Florence World Energy Research Symp., Firenze, Italy, 1990, pp. 181–192.
58.
RosenM. A.HorazakD. A.Energy and exergy analyses of PFBC power plants. In Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustions (Eds CuencaAlvarez M.AnthonyE. J.), Chapter 11, 1995, pp. 419–448 (Chapman and Hall, London).
59.
JinH.IshidaM.KobayashiM.NunokawaM.Exergy evaluation of two current advanced power plants: Supercritical steam turbine and combined cycle. J. Energy Res. Technol., 1997, 119, 250–256.
60.
LozanoM. A.ValeroA.Application of the exergetic costs theory to a steam boiler in a thermal generating station. In Analysis and Design of Advanced Energy Systems: Applications (Eds MoranM. J.), 1987, pp. 41–52, (ASME, New York).
61.
AgazziniA.MassardoA. F.A tool for thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of gas, steam and combined plants. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 1997, 119, 885–892.
62.
LinnhoffB.AlanisF. J.A systems approach based on pinch technology to commercial power station design. In Analysis and Design of Energy Systems: Fundamentals and Mathematical Techniques (Eds BajuraR. A.), 1989, pp. 31–44, (ASME, New York).
63.
DholeV. R.ZhengJ. P.Applying combined pinch and exergy analysis to closed-cycle gas turbine system design. J. Engng Gas Turbines Power, 1995, 117, 47–52.
64.
WallG.GongM.Exergy analysis versus pinch technology. Proc. Int. Conf. on Efficiency, Costs, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Aspects of Energy Systems (ECOS1996), Stockholm, Sweden, 25-27 June 1996, pp. 451–455.
65.
MelliR.PaolettiB.SciubbaE.SYSLAM: An interactive expert system approach to powerplant design and optimization. In A Future for Energy (Eds SteccoS. S.MoranM. J.), 1990, pp. 371–385 (Pergamon, Oxford, Great Britain).
66.
MastrulloR.RaCy: A software for Rankine cycles exergetic analyses. In Thermodynamics and the Design, Analysis, and Improvement of Energy Systems (Ed. BoehmR. F.), 1992, pp. 187–192 (ASME, New York).
67.
SteccoS. S.ManfridaG.BidiniG.A computer program for exergy loss modeling in steam turbine power plants. In Computer-Aided Engineering of Energy Systems (Ed. GaggioliR. A.), 1986, pp. 57–64 (ASME, New York).
68.
SommertonC. W.BrouilletteT.PourciauC.StrawnD.WhitehouseL.RANKINE: A computer software package for the analysis and design of steam power generating units. In Analysis of Energy System—Design and Operation (Ed. GaggioliR. A.), 1985, pp. 65–70 (ASME, New York).
69.
Ong'iroA.UgursalV. I.Al TaweelA. M.WalkerJ. D.Modeling of heat recovery steam generator for a combined cycle power plant. Appl. Thermal Engng, 1997, 17, 427–466.
70.
Ong'iroA.UgursalV. I.Al TaweelA. M.La JeunesseG.Thermodynamic simulation of a steam CHP plant using ASPEN PLUS. Appl. Thermal Engng, 1996, 16, 263–271.
71.
PerezE.A computer method for thermal power calculation. J. Engng Gas Turbines Power, 1991, 113, 184–189.
72.
RojwatnaP.Computer-aided analyses of energy and exergy for thermal power plant. Ph.D. diss., KMITNB, Thailand, 1990.
73.
Ong'iroA.UgursalV. I.Al TaweelA. M.Techno-economics analysis of IGCC power generation systems based on entrained-bed gasifiers. Proc. of the Florence World Energy Research Sysmposium (FLOWERS1997), Firenze, Italy, 1997, pp. 407–418.
74.
Al-BagawiJ. J.Energy and exergy analysis of Ghazlan Power Plant. M.Sc. Thesis, KFUPM, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, 1994.
