Computational fluid dynamics investigation of some wind turbine rotor design parameters

Abstract

This article presents an investigation of the relative importance of key design parameters of a horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) blade. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is used as the main tool, after validation against experimental data of the (National Aeronautics and Space Administration/National Renewable Energy Laboratory) NREL/NASA-Ames Phase VI wind tunnel campaign. Tip and root sections, blade aspect ratio, and pitch angle were analysed and all CFD calculations were performed using a compressible Reynolds-averaged Navier—Stokes solver. CFD grids of advanced multi-block topologies were used including up to 4.5 million cells. A grid convergence study indicated that a resolution of 3.4 million cells was adequate for the selected flow conditions, which correspond to an upwind wind turbine at 0° yaw angle, 7 m/s wind speed, and 72 r/min rotational speed. Various root and tip configurations were considered and the results obtained indicate that the exact representation of the root and tip geometry of an HAWT has a small but finite effect in the thrust and torque levels at working conditions. This effect is however secondary to the effects of aspect ratio and blade pitch.

Keywords

horizontal axis wind turbine Annex XX Phase VI computational fluid dynamics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Betz

Windmills in the light of modern research. Technical report National Advisory Comittee for Aeronautics, Technical Memorandum 474, August 1928.

Ahmed Shata

A. S.

Hanitsch

Electricity generation and wind potential assessment at Hurghada, Egypt. Renew. Energy, 2007, 33(1), 141–148.

Marsh

Composites help improve wind turbine breed. Reinf. Plastics, 2005, 49(4), 18–22.

Vermeer

L. J.

Sørensen

J. N.

Crespo

Wind turbine wake aerodynamics. Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 2003, 39(6–7), 467–510.

Schmitz

Chattot

J.-J.

A parallelized coupled Navier-Stokes/vortex-panel solver. J. Sol. Energy Eng., 2005, 127(4), 475–487.

Sørensen

N. N.

Michelsen

J. A.

Schreck

Navier-Stokes predictions of the NREL phase VI rotor in the NASA ames 80 ft x 120 ft wind tunnel. Wind Energy, 2002, 5(2–3), 151–169.

Duque

E. P. N.

Burklund

M. D.

Johnson

Navier-Stokes and comprehensive analysis performance predictions of the NREL phase VI experiment. J. Sol. Energy Eng., 2003, 125(4), 457–467.

Michelsen

J. A.

Basis3D - a platform for development of multiblock PDE solvers. Technical report AFM 92–05, Technical University of Denmark, 1992.

Michelsen

J. A.

Block structured multigrid solution of 2D and 3D elliptic PDEs. Technical report AFM 94–06, Technical University of Denmark, 1994.

10.

Sørensen

N. N.

General purpose flow solve applied to flor over hills. Technical report AFM 94–06, Risø, 1995.

11.

Jaccarino

Predictions of a turbulent separated flow using commercial CFD codes. J. Fluids Eng., 2001, 123 819–828.

12.

Basara

Alajbegovic

Beader

Simulation of single- and two-phase florw on sliding unstructured meshes using finite volume medthod. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 2005, 45(10), 1137–1159.

13.

Wolfe

W. P.

Ochs

S. S.

CFD calculations of S809 aerodynamic characteristics. In the 35th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA, 6–9 January 1997, AIAA paper 97–0973.

14.

Kufeld

R. M.

Wind turbine calculations and validation. NASA Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI) Ames Research Center Research and Technology 2000, NASA/TM-2001–210935, June 2002, pp. 43–44.

15.

Duque

van Dam

C. P.

Hughes

S. C.

Navier-Stokes simulations of the NREL combined experiment phase II rotor. In the 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, AIAA paper 1999–37, 11–14 January 1999, pp. 143–153.

16.

Jackson

K. J.

Zuteck

M. D.

van Dam

C. P.

Standish

K. J.

Berry

Innovative design approaches for large wind turbine blades. Wind Energy, 2004, 8(2), 141–171.

17.

Le Pape

Lecanu

3D Navier-Stokes computations of a stall-regulated wind turbine. Wind Energy, 2004, 7(4), 309–324.

18.

Chaviaropoulos

P. K.

Sørensen

N. N.

Hansen

M. O. L.

Nikolaou

I. G.

Aggelis

K. A.

Johansen

Gaunaa

Hambraus

von Geyr

H. F.

Hirsch

Shun

Voutsinas

S. G.

Tzabiras

Perivolaris

Dyrmose

S. Z.

Viscous and aero-elastic effects on wind turbine blades. The VISCEL project. Part II: Aero-elastic stability investigations. Wind Energy, 2003, 6(4), 387–403.

19.

Eliasson

Wang

Meijer

Nordstroem

Unsteady Euler computations through non-matching and sliding-zone interfaces. In 36th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 12–15 January 2001, AIAA paper 1998–0371.

20.

Chaviaropoulos

P. K.

Nikolaou

I. G.

Aggelis

K. A.

Sørensen

N. N.

Johansen

Hansen

M. O. L.

Gaunaa

von Hambraus

Geyr

H. F.

Hirsch

Shun

Voutsinas

S. G.

Tzabiras

Perivolaris

Dyrmose

S. Z.

Viscous and aero-elastic effects on wind turbine blades. The VISCEL Project. Part I: 3D Navier-Stokes rotor simulations. Wind Energy, 2003, 6(4), 365–385.

21.

Morris

Long

Brentner

An aeroacoustic analysis of wind turbines. In the 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 5–8 January 2004, AIAA paper 2004–1184.

22.

Arakawa

Fleig

Iida

Shimooka

Numerical approach for noise reduction of wind turbine blade tip with earth simulator. J. Earth Simul, 2005, 2, 11–33.

23.

LePape

Gleize

Improved Navier-Stokes computations of a stall-regulated wind turbine using low Mach number preconditioning. In the 44th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 9–12 January 2006, AIAA paper 2006–1502.

24.

Zahle

Johansen

Wind turbine rotor-tower interaction using an incompressible overset grid method. In the AIAA 45th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 8–11 January 2007, AIAA paper 2007–425.

25.

Hansen

M. O. L.

Johansen

Tip studies using CFD and comparison with tip loss models. Wind Energy, 2004, 7(4), 343–356.

26.

Hand

M. M.

Simms

D. A.

Fingersh

L. J.

Jager

D. W.

Cotrell

J. R.

Schreck

Larwood

S. M.

Unsteady aerodynamics experiment phase VI: wind tunnel test configurations and available data campaigns. Technical report TP-500-29955, NREL, December 2001.

27.

Steijl

Barakos

Badcock

A framework for CFD analysis of helicopter rotors in Hover and Forward flight. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 2006, 51(8), 819–847.

28.

Jameson

Computational algorithms for aerodynamic analysis and designe. Appl. Numer. Math., 1993, 13(5), 383–422.

29.

Badcock

K. J.

Richards

B. E.

Woodgate

M. A.

Elements of computational fluid dynamics on block structured grids using implicit solvers. Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 2000, 36, 351–392.

30.

Morvant

Badcock

Barakos

Richards

B. E.

Aerofoil-vortex interaction using the compressible vorticity confinement method. AIAA J., 2005, 43(1), 63–75.

31.

Spentzos

Barakos

Badcock

Richards

B. E.

Wenert

Schreck

Raffel

Investigation of three-dimensional dynamic stall using computational fluid dynamics. AIAA J., 2005, 43(5), 1023–1033.

32.

Barakos

Steijl

Badcock

Brocklehurst

Development of CFD capability for full helicopter engineering analysis. In the 31st European Rotorcraft Forum, Florence, Italy, September 2005.

33.

Nayyar

Barakos

G. N.

Badcock

K. J.

Numerical study of transonic cavity flows using large-eddy and detached-eddy simulations. Aeronaut. J., 2007, 111(1117), 153–164.

34.

Steijl

Nayyar

Woodgate

M. A.

Badcock

K. J.

Barakos

G. N.

Application of an implicit dual-time stepping multi-block solver to 3D unsteady flows. In the International Conference on Parallel CFD, College Park Campus, Maryland, 24–27 May 2005.

35.

Wilcox

D. C.

Turbulence modelling for CFD, 1994 (DCW Industries, Inc., La Cañada, California).

36.

Buterfield

C. P.

Scott

Musiall

Comparison of wind-tunnel airfoil performance data with wind turbine blade data. J. Sol. Energy Eng., Trans. ASME, 1992, 114(2), 119–124.

37.

Yang

S. L.

Chang

Y. L.

Arici

Incompressible Navier-Stokes computation of the NREL airfoils using a symmetric total variational diminishing scheme. J. Sol. Energy Eng., Trans. ASME, 1994, 116(4), 174–182.

38.

Somers

D. M.

Tangler

J. L.

Wind tunnel test of the S814 thick root airfoil. J. Sol. Energy Eng., Trans. ASME, 1996, 118(4), 217–221.

39.

Papadakis

Navier-Stokes computations for an S809 airfoil with aerodynamic control devices. In the 36th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 12–15 January 1988, AIAA paper 98–33.

40.

Johansen

Sørensen

N. N.

Aerofoil characteristics from 3D CFD rotor computations. Wind Energy, 2004, 7(4), 283–294.

41.

Benjanirat

Sankar

Recent improvement to a combined Navier-Stokes/full potential methodology for modeling horizontal axis wind turbines. In the 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 5–8 January 2004, AIAA paper 2004–830.

42.

Schreck

Robinson

Rotational augmentation of horizontal axis wind turbine blade aerodynamic response. Wind Energy, 2002, 5(2–3), 133–150.

43.

Sankar

L. N.

Application of a viscous flow methodology to the NREL phase VI rotor. In the 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 14–17 January 2002, AIAA paper 2002–0030.

44.

Laino

D. J.

Hansen

A. C.

Minnema

J. E.

Validation of the aeroDyn subroutines using NREL unsteady aerodynamics experiment data. Wind Energy, 2002, 5(2–3), 227–244.