The effects of clearance sizes on labyrinth brush seal leakage performance using a Reynolds-averaged Navier—Stokes solver and non-Darcian porous medium model

Abstract

Effects of clearance sizes on the pressure and leakage characteristics in a shaft labyrinth brush seal were numerically investigated using Reynolds-averaged Navier—Stokes (RANS) and non-Darcian porous medium model solutions. The leakage flow characteristics in the referenced design shaft labyrinth seal of turbomachinery was initially studied using the RANS solution. The initial shaft labyrinth seal was redesigned into the multi-stage labyrinth brush seal. The reliability and accuracy of the RANS and the non-Darcian porous medium model for leakage flow in brush seals were demonstrated through comparison of the experimental data. Then, the leakage flowrate of the redesigned shaft labyrinth brush seal was calculated at four sizes of bristle pack tip clearances (0, 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mm) and compared with the referenced shaft labyrinth seal. The numerical results show that the leakage flowrate increases rapidly with increasing clearance between the bristle pack tip and the rotor surface for the shaft labyrinth brush seal. The leakage flow pattern in the referenced labyrinth seal and the redesigned shaft labyrinth brush seal was also illustrated.

Keywords

labyrinth seal brush seal leakage performance non-Darcian porous medium model numerical simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chupp

R. E.

Hendricks

R. C.

Lattime

S. B.

Steinetz

B. M.

, ‘Sealing in turbomachinery’ J. Propuls. Power 22 2 (2006): 313–349.

Stocker

H. L.

Cox

D. M.

Holle

G. F.

, ‘Aerodynamic performance of conventional and advanced design labyrinth seals with solid-smooth’ (1977): Abradable and Honeycomb Lands, NASA CR-135307.

Dinc

Demiroglu

Turnquist

Mortzheim

Goetze

Maupin

Hopkins

Wolfe

Florin

, ‘Fundamental design issues of brush seals for industrial applications’ J. Turbomach. 124 2 (2002): 293–300.

Neef

Sulda

Suerken

Walkenhorst

, ‘Design features and performance details of brush seals for turbine applications’ (2006): ASME paper GT2006-90404.

Ferguson

J. G.

, ‘Brushes as high performance gas turbine seals’ (1988): ASME paper 88-GT-182.

Chew

J. W.

Hogg

S. I.

, ‘Porosity modeling of brush seals’ ASME J. Tribol. 119 (1997): 769–775.

Chupp

R. E.

Dowler

C. A.

, ‘Performance characteristics of brush seals for limited-life engines’ ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 115 (1993): 390–396.

Bayley

F. J.

Long

C. A.

, ‘A combined experimental and theoretical study of flow and pressure distribution in a brush seal’ J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 115 2 (1993): 404–410.

Turner

M. T.

Chew

J. W.

Long

C. A.

, ‘Experimental investigation and mathematical modeling of clearance brush seals’ ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 120 (1998): 573–589.

10.

Chen

L. H.

Wood

P. E.

Jones

T. V.

Chew

J. W.

, ‘Detailed experimental studies of flow in large scale brush seal model and a comparison with CFD predictions’ ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 122 3 (2000): 672–679.

11.

Braun

M. J.

Kudriavstev

V. V.

, ‘A numerical simulation of a brush seal section and some experimental results’ ASME J. Turbomach. 117 (1995): 190–202.

12.

Kudriavstev

V. V.

Braun

M. J.

, ‘Model developments for the brush seal numerical simulation’ J. Propuls. Power 12 1 (1996): 193–201.

13.

Sharatchandra

M. C.

Rhode

D. L.

, ‘Computed effects of rotor-induced swirl on brush seal performance—part I: Leakage analysis’ ASME J. Turbomach. 118 (1996): 912–919.

14.

Braun

M. J.

Canacci

V. A.

Hendricks

R. C.

, ‘Flow visualization and quantitative velocity and pressure measurements in simulated single and double brush seals’ Tribol. Trans. 34 (1991): 70–80.

15.

Chew

J. W.

Lapworth

B. L.

Millener

P. J.

, ‘Mathematical modeling of brush seals’ Int. J. Heat Transf. Fluid Flow 16 6 (1995): 494–500.

16.

Chew

J. W.

Hogg

S. I.

, ‘Porosity modeling of brush seals’ ASME J. Tribol. 119 (1997): 769–775.

17.

Yan

Feng

Obi

, ‘Study on the leakage flow field in the shaft brush seal of steam turbines’ In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Fluid machinery and fluid engineering, Beijing, China, 2008.

18.

Dogu

, ‘Investigation of brush seal flow characteristics using bulk porous medium approach’ ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 127 (2005): 136–144.

19.

Dogu

Aksit

M. F.

, ‘Effects of geometry on brush seal pressure and flow fields—part I: Front plate configurations’ ASME J. Turbomach. 128 1 (2006): 367–378.

20.

Dogu

Aksit

M. F.

, ‘Effects of geometry on brush seal pressure and flow fields—part II: Backing plate and configurations’ ASME J. Turbomach. 128 1 (2006): 379–389.

21.

Dogu

Akist

M. F.

Demiroglu

Dinc

O. S.

, ‘Evaluation of flow behavior for clearance brush seals’ ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 130 (2008): 012507-1–012507-9.

22.

FLUENT 6.1. Documentation—FLUENT package (Lebanon, NH: Fluent Inc. 2003).