Wake-tracking and turbulence modelling in computational aerodynamics of wind turbine aerofoils

Abstract

This article addresses two modelling aspects of wind turbine aerofoil aerodyna-mics based on the solution of the Reynolds-averaged Navier—Stokes (RANS) equations. One of these is the effect of an a priori method for structured grid adaptation aimed at improving the wake resolution. The presented results emphasize that the proposed adaptation strategy greatly improves the wake resolution in the far field, whereas the wake is completely diffused by the non-adapted grid with the same number and spacing patterns of grid nodes. The proposed adaptation approach can be easily included in the structured generation process of both commercial and in-house-structured mesh generators.

The other numerical aspect examined herein is the impact of particular choices for turbulence modelling on the predicted solution. This includes the comparative analysis of numerical solutions obtained by using different turbulence models, and also aims at quantifying the solution inaccuracy arising from not modelling the laminar-to-turbulent transition. It is found that the drag forces obtained by considering the flow as transitional or fully turbulent may differ by 50 per cent.

All these issues are investigated using a special-purpose hyperbolic grid generator and two multi block structured finite volume RANS codes. The numerical experiments consider the flow field past a wind turbine aerofoil for which an exhaustive campaign of steady and unsteady experimental measurements was conducted. The predictive capabilities of the CFD solvers are validated by comparing experimental data and numerical predictions for selected flow regimes. The incompressible analysis and design code XFOIL is also used to support the findings of the comparative analysis of numerical RANS-based results and experimental data.

Keywords

wake-tracking turbulence modelling grid generation wind turbine aerodynamics Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bertagnolio

Sorensen

N. N.

Rasmussen

, ‘New insight into the flow around a wind turbine aerofoil section’ Sol. Energy Eng. 127 (2005): 214–222.

Stone

C. P.

Tebo

S. M.

Duque

C. P. N.

, ‘Fluid dynamics of flatback aerofoils for wind turbine applications’ (2006) AIAA paper no. 2006-194.

Le Pape

Lecanu

, ‘3D Navier—Stokes computations of a stall-regulated wind turbine’ Wind Energy 7 (2004): 309–324.

Wolfe

W. P.

Ochs

S. S.

, ‘CFD calculations of S809 aerodynamic characteristics’ (1997) AIAA paper no. 07-0973.

Langtry

R. B.

Gola

Menter

F. R.

, ‘Predicting two-dimensional aerofoil and 3D wind turbine rotor performance using a transitional model for general CFD codes’ (2006) AIAA paper no. 2006-395.

Wilcox

D. C.

, ‘Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models’ AIAA J. 26 (1988): 1299–1310.

Menter

F. R.

, ‘Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications’ AIAA J. 32 (1994): 1598–1605.

Paparone

Tognaccini

, ‘Computational fluid dynamics-based drag prediction and decomposition’ AIAA J. 41 (2003): 1647–1657.

Fletcher

T. M.

Brown

R. E.

, ‘Simulating wind turbine interactions using the vorticity transport equations’ In Proceedings of the 28th ASMEWind Energy Symposium, Orlando, January 2009.

10.

Habashi

W. G.

Dompierre

Bourgaulta

Ait-Ali-Yahiaa

Fortin

Vallet

M.-G.

, ‘Anisotropic mesh adaptation: Towards user-independent, mesh-independent and solver-independent CFD. Part I: General principles’ Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 32 (2000): 725–744.

11.

Wang

Z. J.

, ‘High-order methods for the Euler and Navier—Stokes equations on unstructured grids’ Progr. Aerosp. Sci. 43 (2007): 1–41.

12.

Fuglsang

Antoniou

Dahl

K. S.

Madsen

H. A.

, ‘Wind tunnel tests of the FFA-W3-241, FFA-W3-301 and NACA-63-430 aerofoils’ (1998) Technical report R-1041(EN), Riso National Laboratory, Denmark.

13.

Morrison

J. H.

, ‘A compressible Navier—Stokes solver with two-equation and Reynolds stress turbulence closure models’ (1992) NASA CR4440.

14.

Drela

Mueller

T. J.

, ‘An analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils’ Lecture notes in engineering (New York: Springer 1989): 1–12.

15.

Drela

Giles

, ‘Viscous-inviscid analysis of transonic and low Reynolds number airfoils’ AIAA J. 25 (1987): 1347–1355.

16.

Foerster

Campobasso

M. S.

, ‘Development of a hyperbolic grid generation code and viscous CFD analysis of wind turbine aerofoils’ (2008) Technical report 0802, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow, UK.

17.

Guerri

Bouhadef

Harhd

, ‘Turbulent flow simulation of the NREL S809 aerofoil’ Wind Eng. 30 (2006): 287–302.

18.

Zhang

H. S.

R. M. C.

Gatski

T. B.

Speziale

C. G.

R. M. C.

Speziale

C. G.

Launder

B. R.

, A near-wall second-order scheme for compressible turbulent flows, near-wall turbulent flows (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers 1933).

19.

Gatski

Speziale

, ‘On explicit algebraic stress models to compute turbulent flows’ J. Fluid Mech. 254 (1993): 59–78.

20.

Spalart

P. R.

Allmaras

S. R.

, ‘A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows’ Rech. Aérosp. 1 (1994): 5.

21.

Somers

D. M.

, ‘Design and experimental results for the S809 airfoil’ (1997) Technical report NREL/SR-440-6918, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado, USA.

22.

Campobasso

M. S.

Zanon

Foerster

Fraysse

Bonfiglioli

, ‘CFD modelling of wind turbine aerofoil aerodynamics’ 63° Congresso Nazionale ATI Energia per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile, Palermo, Italy, 23–26 September 2008.