A new non-fragile H ∞ proportional—integral filtered-error adaptive observer for a class of non-linear systems and its application to synchronous generators
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2011
A new non-fragile H ∞ proportional—integral filtered-error adaptive observer for a class of non-linear systems and its application to synchronous generators
In this paper, a parameter and state estimation problem in the presence of observer gain perturbations and input disturbance is discussed for the Lipschitz systems that are linear in unknown parameters and non-linear in states. A non-linear non-fragile proportional—integral filtered-error adaptive observer is designed, and its stability conditions based on the Lyapunov technique are derived. The optimal gain among a solution set that satisfies the observer stability conditions is derived systematically using the linear matrix inequality approach. Numerical examples, as well as a synchronous generator case study, are provided in which the non-linear terms depend on the unmeasured states. The proposed design is more robust against both disturbance and gain perturbations than those presented in recent research. Moreover, it is feasible for much larger values of the Lipschitz constants than is the case for conventional methods.
Leo'n-MoralesJ. D.Acha-DazaS., ‘Observer-based control for a synchronous generator.’Int. J. Electl Power and Energy Systems22 (2002): 575–587.
2.
Leo'n-MoralesJ. D.BusawonK.Acosta-VillarrealG.Acha-DazaS., ‘Nonlinear control for small synchronous generator.’Int. J. Electl Power and Energy Systems23 (2002): 1–11.
3.
Leo'n-MoralesJ. D.Spinosa-PeresG.Macias-CardosoI., ‘Observer based control of synchronus generator: a Hamiltonian approach.’Int. J. Electl Power and Energy Systems24 (8) (2002): 655–663.
4.
GarimellaP.YaoB., ‘Nonlinear adaptive robust observer design for a class of nonlinear systems.’ In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Denver, Colorado, 2003, pp. 4391–4396.
5.
BastinG.GeversM. R., ‘Stable adaptive observers for nonlinear time-varying systems.’IEEE Trans. Autom. Control33 (1981): 650–658.
6.
MarinoR., ‘Adaptive observers for single output nonlinear systems.’IEEE Trans. Autom. Control35 (1991): 1054–1058.
7.
MarinoR.TomeiP., ‘Global adaptive observers for nonlinear systems via filtered transformations.’IEEE Trans. Autom. Control37 (1991): 1239–1245.
8.
MarinoR.TomeiP., ‘Adaptive observers with arbitrary exponential rate of convergence for nonlinear systems.’IEEE Trans. Autom. Control40 (1991): 1300–1304.
9.
RajamaniR.HedrickJ. K., ‘Adaptive observers for active automotive suspensions: Theory and experiment.’IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technol.3 (1991): 86–93.
10.
ChoY. M.RajamaniR., ‘A systematic approach to adaptive observer synthesis for nonlinear systems.’IEEE Trans. Autom. Control42 (1991): 534–537.
11.
MarinoR.SantosuossoG. L.TomeiP., ‘Robust adaptive observers for nonlinear systems with bounded disturbances.’IEEE Trans. Autom. Control46 (2002): 967–972.
12.
JungJ.HulK.FathyH. K.SreinJ. L., ‘Optimal robust adaptive observer design for a class of nonlinear systems via an H-infinity approach.’ In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Minneapolis, 2006, pp. 3637–3642.
13.
JungJ.HwangJ.HuhK., ‘Optimal proportional-integral adaptive observer design for a class, of uncertain nonlinear systems.’ In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, New York, 2007, pp. 1931–1936.
14.
JeongC. S.YazE. E.BahakeemA.YazY. I., ‘Resilient design of observers with general criteria using LMIs.’ In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Minneapolis, 2006, pp. 111–116.
DoratoP., ‘Non-fragile controller design: an overview.’ -fragile controller design: an overview. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Philadelphia, 1998, pp. 2829–2831.
17.
BoydS.GhaouiL. E.FeronE.BalakrishnanV., Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia1994).
18.
ChenF.ZhangW., ‘LMI criteria for robust chaos synchronization of a class of chaotic systems.’Nonlinear Analysis67 (2002): 3384–3393.
19.
KrsticM.KanellakopoulosI.KokotovicP., Nonlinear and adaptive control design (John Wiley, Chichester1995).
20.
IoannouP. A.SunJ., Robust adaptive control (Prentice Hall, New Jersey1996).
21.
LofbergJ., ‘YALMIP: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB.’ In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Computer aided control system design, Taipei 2004, pp. 284–289.
22.
GahinetP.NemirovskiA.LaubA.ChilaiM., LMI control toolbox user's guide (The Mathworks, Massachusetts1995).
23.
BergenA., Power system analysis (Prentice Hall, New Jersey1986).
24.
IEEE guide: Test procedures for synchronous machines (1995) IEEE std 115-1995, Part II (Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers).
25.
PourgholiM.MajdV. J.AghamohammadiM. R., ‘Montazer-Gaem gas unit synchronous generator's parameter identification using SSFR tests.’Int. J. Mathl Models Meth. Appl. Sci.3 (2002): 423–431.
