Even though employed widely in industrial practice, the popular proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller has weaknesses that limit its achievable performance. In this paper, an alternative control scheme that combines the simplicity of the PID controller with the versatility of model predictive control is presented. The result is a controller that combines the time-delay compensation capability of predictive control algorithms, the effectiveness of inferential control schemes for disturbance rejection, and the adaptation capabilities of switching controllers. The robust stability and performance of the controller are analysed. These results are then used to generate two tuning procedures. The design, implementation, and performance of the controller are illustrated via simulations on linear and non-linear systems.
OgunnaikeB.MukatiK.‘An alternative structure for next generation regulatory controllers part I: Basic theory for design, development and implementation.’J. Process Control16 (5) (2006): 499–509
16.
ErgonR.‘On primary output estimation by use of secondary measurements as input signals in system identification.’IEEE Trans. Autom. Control44 (4) (1999): 821–825
17.
GiovaniniL.‘Embedded estimator in predictive feedback control.’ISA Trans.43 (3) (2004): 343–359
18.
GiovaniniL.GrimbleM.‘Generalised predictive feedback control.’ In Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference onDecision and control, Hawaii, USA, 9-12 December 2003, pp. 923–928 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ).
19.
KitanidisP.‘Unbiased minimum-variance linear state estimation.’Automatica23 (6) (1987): 775–578
20.
GillijnsS.de MoorB.‘Unbiased minimum-variance input and state estimation for linear discrete-time stochastic systems.’ Internal report ESAT-SISTA/TR 05-228, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 2005.
21.
Palanthandalam-MadapusiH.GillijnsS.de MooreB.BernsteinD.‘System identification for nonlinear model updating.’ American Control Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 14-16 June 2006.
22.
Palanthandalam-MadapusiH.BernsteinD.‘Unbiased minimum-variance filtering for input reconstruction.’ American Control Conference, 2007.
23.
KellerJ.‘Fault isolation filter design for linear stochastic systems.’Automatica35 (10) (1999): 1701–1706
24.
MorariM.ZafiriouE.Robust process control, (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ1989)
KeviczkyL.BányászC.‘Future of the Smith predictor based regulators comparing to Youla parametrisation.’ In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Mediterranean Conference onControl and automation, Athens, Greece, 27-29 June 2007, pp. 1–5.
27.
YdstieB.KershenbaumL.SargentR.‘Theory and application of an extended horizon self-tuning controller.’AIChE J.31 (11) (1985): 1771–1780
28.
IsermannR.Digital control systems, (Springer-Verlag, New York1996)
29.
ArulalanG.DeshpandeP.‘Simplified model predictive control.’Ind. Engng Chem. Res.26 (2) (1987): 347–356
30.
AngelisG.System analysis, modelling and control with polytopic linear models PhD Thesis, University of Eindhoven, 2001.
31.
MirkinL.RaskinN.‘Every stabilising dead-time controller has an observer-predictor based structure.’Automatica39 (10) (2003): 1747–1754
32.
PolyakB.ShcherbakovP.‘Superstable linear control systems. I. Analysis.’Autom. Remote Control63 (8) (2002): 1239–1254
33.
GiovaniniL.BenosmanM.OrdysA.‘Adaptive control using multiple models and switching.’ In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference onIndustrial and control applications, Quito, Ecuador, 2005, pp. 1–8 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ).
34.
BlanchiniF.SznaierM.‘A convex optimization approach to fixed-order controller design for disturbance rejection in SISO systems.’IEEE Trans. Autom. Control45 (5) (2000): 784–789
35.
PrettD.MorariM.‘The Shell Process Control Workshop'47, 1986, pp. 755–765 (Butterworths, Stoneham, MA).
36.
OgunnaikeB.RayW.Process dynamics, modelling and control, (Oxford University Press, New York1994)
37.
ManerB.DoyleF.OgunnaikeB.PearsonR.‘Nonlinear model predictive control of a simulated multivariable polymerisation reactor using second order Volterra models.’Automatica32 (9) (1996): 1285–1301
