Airborne wear particles from passenger car disc brakes: A comparison of measurements from field tests,a disc brake assembly test stand,and a pin-on-disc machine
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2010
Airborne wear particles from passenger car disc brakes: A comparison of measurements from field tests,a disc brake assembly test stand,and a pin-on-disc machine
Most modern passenger cars have disc brakes on the front wheels. Unlike drum brakes, disc brakes are not sealed off from the ambient air. During braking, both the rotor and the pads wear, and this wear process generates particles that may become airborne. In field tests it is difficult to distinguish these particles from others in the environment. It is thus preferable to conduct tests using laboratory test stands where the cleanness of the surrounding air can be controlled. However, the validity of results from these test stands should be verified by comparison with field tests. This article presents a comparison of the number and volume distributions of airborne wear particles as measured online in field tests, in a disc brake assembly test stand, and in a pin-on-disc machine. In all cases, grey cast iron rotors and low metallic pads were tested. A promising correlation between the three different test methods is shown. The number- and volume-weighted mean particle diameter for all test methods is about 0.4 and 2-3 μm, respectively.
KatsouyanniK.TouloumiG.SamoliE.GryparisA.Le TertreA.MonopolisY.RossiG.ZmirouD.‘Confounding and effect modification in the short-term effects of ambient particles on total mortality: Results from 29 European cities within the APHEA2 project’Epidemiology125 (2001): 521–531
2.
SametJ. M.DominiciF.CurrieroF. C.CoursacI.ZegerS. L.‘Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities 1987-1994’N. Engl. J. Med.34324 (2000): 1742–1749
3.
PopeC. A.BurnettR. T.ThunM. J.CalleE. E.KrewskiD.ItoK.ThurstonG. D.‘Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution’JAMA287 (2002): 1132–1141
QuerolX.AlastueyA.RuizC. R.ArtiñanoB.HanssonH. C.HarrisonR. M.BuringhE.Ten BrinkH. M.LutzM.BruckmannP.StraehP.SchneiderJ.‘Speciation and origin of PM10 and PM2.5 in selected European cities’Atmos. Environ.38 (2004): 6547–6555
7.
GehrigR.HillM.BuchmannB.‘Separate determination of PM10 emission factors of road traffic for tailpipe emissions and emissions from abrasion and resuspension processes’Int. J. Environ. Pollut.223 (2004): 312–325
8.
SeatonA.CherrieJ.DennekampM.DonaldsonK.HurleyJ.TranC.‘The London underground: Dust and hazards to health’Occup. Environ. Med.626 (2005): 355–362
9.
BranisM.‘The contributions of ambient sources to particle pollution in spaces and trains of the Prague underground transport system’Atmos. Environ.402 (2006): 348–356
10.
Abu-AllabanM.GilliesJ. A.GertlerA. W.ClaytonR.ProffittD.‘Tailpipe, resuspended road dust, and brake-wear emission factors from on-road vehicles’Atmos. Environ.3737 (2003): 5283–5293
11.
WeckwerthG.‘Verification of traffic-emitted aerosol components in the ambient air of Cologne (in German)’Atmos. Environ.3532 (2001): 5525–5536
12.
SandersP. G.XuN.DalkaT. M.MaricoM.‘Airborne brake wear debris: Size distributions, composition of dynamometer and vehicle test’Environ. Sci. Technol.3718 (2003): 4060–4069
13.
LougG.SchaurJ. J.SooparkJ.ShaferM.DeminterJ.WeinsteinJ.‘Emission of metals associated with motor vehicle roadways’Environ. Sci. Technol.393 (2005): 826–836
14.
BlauP. J.Oak ridge national laboratory technical report ORNL/TM-2001/64, 2001, p. 24.
15.
BlauP. J.MeyerH. M.‘Characteristics of wear particles produced during friction tests of conventional and unconventional disc brakes materials’Wear2557-12 (2003): 1261–1269
SöderbergA.WahlströmJ.OlanderL.JanssonA.OlofssonU. On airborne wear particles emissions of commercial disc brake materials: a pin on disc simulation (2008): TRITA-MMK 2008:20/ISSN 1400-1179/ISRN/KTH/MMK/R-08/20-SE, Stockholm
18.
WahlströmJ.SöderbergA.OlanderL.OlofssonU.‘A disc brake test stand for measurement of airborne wear particles’J. Lubr. Sci.216 (2009): 241–252
19.
WahlströmJ.OlofssonU.OlanderL.JanssonA. ‘Airborne wear particles emissions from commercial disc brake materials - passenger car field test’ (2008): TRITA-MMK 2008:21/ISSN 1400-1179 /ISRN/KTH/MMK/R-08/21-SE, Stockholm
20.
WahlströmJ.OlanderL.OlofssonU. ‘Airborne wear particles emissions from commercial disc brake materials - disc brake test stand simulations at low contact pressures and rotors pre-conditioned with rust’ (2008): TRITA-MMK 2008:16/ISSN 1400-1179/ISRN/KTH/ MMK/R-08/16-SE, Stockholm
21.
PetersT. M.OttD.O'ShaughnessyP. T.‘Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 portable aerosol spectrometer to the TSI 3321 aerodynamic particle sizer for dry particles’Ann. Occup. Hyg.508 (2006): 843–850
22.
LiuY.DaumP. H.‘The effect of refractive index on size distributions and light scattering coefficients derived from optical particle counters’J. Aerosol Sci.318 (2000): 945–957
23.
ChengY. H.‘Comparison of the TSI Model 8520 and Grimm series 1.108 portable aerosol instruments used to monitor particulate matter in an iron foundry’J. Occup. Environ. Hyg.53 (2008): 157–168
24.
ZhuY.YuN.KuhnT.HindsW.‘Field comparison of P-Trak and condensation particle counters’Aerosol Sci. Technol.406 (2006): 422–430
25.
MoslehM.BlauP. J.DumitrescuD.‘Characteristics and morphology of wear particles from laboratory testing of disc brake materials’Wear25611-12 (2004): 1128–1134
26.
IijimaA.SatoK.YanoK.KatoM.KozawaK.FurutaN.‘Emission factor for antimony in brake abrasion dusts as one of the major atmospheric antimony sources’Environ. Sci. Technol.428 (2008): 2937–2942
27.
AntanaitisD.SanfordJ.‘The effect of racetrack/high energy driving on brake caliper performance’. In Proceedings of the SAE World Congress and Exhibition, Detroit, Michigan, USA, April 2006, SAE paper 2006-01-0472.
28.
OlofssonU.OlanderL.JanssonA.‘A study of airborne wear particles generated from a sliding contact’J. Tribol. in press
