Analysis of the influence of rubber infill morphology on the mechanical performance of artificial turf surfaces for soccer

Abstract

Artificial turf is increasingly being used in the construction of football pitches. One of its characteristics is an infill of sand and rubber granules. At present, different materials and layer thicknesses, as well as grain sizes are used for the sand and mainly for the rubber, but they are chosen with little scientific evidence about their influence on the mechanical and biomechanical properties of the pitch. Based on knowledge from materials science, it is reasonable to suggest that grain morphology may have a large influence on pitch performance. This paper presents research conducted to assess the influence of different parameters related to infill grain morphology on the mechanical properties of artificial turf (force reduction (%), vertical deformation (mm) and vertical ball bounce (m)), as well as on their wear with use, measured according to the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) procedures. The results show a significant reduction of pitch performance with use and a significant influence of grain morphology in mechanical response of artificial turf with respect to impact forces and ball rebound.

Keywords

artificial turf impact force pitch performance rubber granules morphology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Valiant

G. A

Schidt

R. C

Hoerner

E. F

Milner

E. M

Morehouse

C. A

‘Traction characteristics of outsoles for use on artificial playing surfaces. Natural and artificial playing fields: characteristics and safety features, ASTM 1073’ American Society for Testing and Materials (Philadelphia: 1990): pp. 61–68

Martin

B. R

Schidt

R. C

Hoerner

E. F

Milner

E. M

Morehouse

C. A

‘Problems associated with testing the impact absorption properties of artificial playing surfaces. Natural and artificial playing fields: characteristics and safety features, ASTM 1073’

American Society for Testing and Materials (Philadelphia: 1990): pp. 77–84

Shorten

Hudson

Himmelsbach

Miltbure

‘Shoe-surface traction of conventional and in-filled synthetic turf football surfaces’ (2003)

Powell

J. W

Schootman

‘A multivariate risk analysis of selected playing surfaces in the National Football League: 1980 to 1989’

Am. J. Sports Medicine 20 (1992): 686–694

Powell

J. W

Schootman

‘A multivariate risk analysis of natural grass and Astro Turf playing surfaces in the National Football League’

Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 7 (1993): 201–221

Ekstrand

Nigg

B. M

‘Surface-related injuries in soccer’

Sports Medicine 8 (1) (1989): 56–62

Baroud

Nigg

B. M

Stefanyshyn

‘Energy storage and return in sport surfaces’

Sports Engineering 2 (1999): 173–180

Dura

J. V

Hoyos

J. V

Martinez

‘The effect of shock absorbing sports surfaces in jumping’

Sports Engineering 2 (2) (1999): 97–102

Dura

J. V

Martinez

A. C

Solaz

‘Testing absorbing materials: the application of viscoelastic linear model’

Sports Engineering 5 (2002): 9–14

10.

Shorten

M. R

Himmelsbach

J. A

Ujihashi

Haake

S. J

‘Shock attenuation of sports surfaces’

The engineering of Sports vol. 4 (2002): pp. 152–159

11.

McNitt

Landschoot

P. J

Petrukak

‘Evaluation of the playing surfaces hardness of an infilled synthetic turf system’ (2004)

12.

Walker

C. A

Haake

‘Experimental mechanics and artificial turf’

The engineering of Sports (Taylor and Francis) 1996): pp. 239–242.

13.

Villwock

M. R

Meyer

E. G

Powell

J. W

Fouty

A. J

Haut

R. C

‘Football playing surface components may affect lower extremity injury risk’ (2008)

14.

Carré

M. J

Haake

S. J

‘An examination of the Clegg impact hammer test with regard to the playing performance of synthetic sport surfaces’

Sports Engineering 7 (3) (2004): 121–129

15.

Shackelford

J. F

Introduction to materials science for engineers (CA: University of California Davis 1998)

16.

FIFA quality concept January 2008 Edition.