Outlines the historical background to the performance of UK industry from which the weaknesses in management education are identified, followed by an indication of needs for the 1980s.
JonesD. T.National Institute economic review, April 1976.
3.
PrattenC. F.c.f. Midland Bank Review, Dec. 1978.
4.
HealeyD.VarleyE.An approach to international strategy. Trade and Industry, Nov. 1975, 322–326.
5.
GallowayD. F.The technology, economy and philosophy of improving productivity in the manufacturing industries. Production Engineer, July 1968, 323–324.
6.
JohnstonJ.The productivity of management consultants. Jl. R. Statist. Soc., Series A (General) 126P2, 237–249.
7.
SwannK.WaddingtonM.Productivity management in the machine tool industry. Production Engineer, March/April 1974, 103–107.
8.
NormanG.Comparative utilization productivity of labour and machines. MSc Thesis, University of Birmingham, 1968.
9.
TinkerG. C.The utilization of machine tools. Report No. 23, Machine Tool Research Association, 1968.
10.
European business.Business Observer, Nov. 1975.
11.
Dept. of Industry c.f. ibid.
12.
Dept. of Industry c.f. ibid.
13.
GranickD.Managerial comparisons of four developed countries: France, Britain, USA, Russia, MIT Press, 1972.
