Methods of analysing single input and single output control systems are well established (1). The same is not true of techniques for solving problems involving multi-inputs and multi-outputs. Such problems arise when controlling manipulators having many degrees of freedom. In this paper techniques of control system synthesis for manipulator mechanisms are considered. The method is based on locating the roots of the characteristic equation to give the desired dynamic properties for every link's servo system in the mechanism. Each link is treated independently. Simple examples to illustrate the method are presented.
FriedlandB.Control systems design: an introduction to state space methods, 1987, McGraw-Hill, New York).
2.
VeznesenskyI. N.About the machine adjustment with large number of parameters. Automatika I Telemechanika, 1938, 4–5, 65–78.
3.
FalbP. L.WolovichW. A.Decoupling in design and synthesis of multivariable control systems. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 1967, 12(6), 651–659.
4.
GilbertE. G.The decoupling of multivariable systems by state feedback. SIAM J. Control, 1969, 7(1), 50–63.
5.
MorganB. S.The synthesis of linear multivariable systems by state variable feedback. Preprints, JACC, Stanford, California, 1964, pp. 468–472.
6.
LuenbergerD. G.Canonical forms for linear multivariable systems. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 1967, AC-12(3), 290–293.
7.
WonhamW. H.Linear multivariable control: a geometric approach, 2nd edition, 1979 (Springer-Verlag, New York).
8.
EykhoffP.Trends and progress in system identification, 1981, Pergamon Press, New York).
9.
PatelR. V.The algorithms for pole assignment of multi-input systems. In Automated control systems design (Eds JamshidyM.HergetC. J.), 1989 (Moscow Machine Building).
10.
MinimisG. S.PaigeC. C.An algorithm for pole assignment of time-invariant linear systems. Int. J. Control, 1982, 35(3), 341–354.
11.
VargaA.A Schur method for pole assignment. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 1981, AC-26(6), 517–519.
12.
FuK. S.GonzalesR. C.LeeC. S. G.Robotics, control and sensing, vision and intelligence, 1988, McGraw-Hill, New York).
13.
MedvedevV. S.LescovA. G.JuschenkoA. S.Control systems of manipulation robots (in Russian), 1978 (Nauka, Moscow).
14.
BenhamidaS.CarrollR. L.Model reference adaptive control of robots using interconnected feedback. Proceedings of the 1991 American Control Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, 26–28 June 1991, pp. 970–971, IEEE Cat. No. 91CH2939–7.
15.
MohadjerM.KhoogarA.Robot manipulator control with joint interaction estimation. Proceedings of IEEE Southeastcon, Williamsburg, Virginia, 8–10 April 1991, Vol. 1, pp. 304–308, IEEE Cat. No. 91CH2998–3.
16.
ChanS. P.A two degrees of freedom control design for robot manipulator using internal structure. Proceedings of IECON91, International Conference on Industrial electronics control and instrumentation, Singapore, 28 October 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 1240–1245, IEEE Cat. No. 91CH2976–9.
17.
SinghJ. R.RastegarJ.Optimal synthesis of robot manipulators based on global dynamic parameters. Int. J. Robotics Res., December 1992, 11(6), 538–548.
