Influence of Electrolytes and a Supercharging Reagent on Charge State Distribution and Response of Neuropeptide Ions Generated during Positive Electrospray Ionisation Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

To aid in the detection of trace quantities of neuropeptides in a biological matrix (as saliva), the influence of different electrolytes and a supercharging reagent on the positive electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) response was investigated. Ammonium acetate, sodium chloride and sodium bicarbonate (10⁻⁷ M to 10⁻³ M) and the supercharging reagent m-nitrobenzyl alcohol (m-NBA) was added to the mobile phase and the effect on the ESI response and charge-states distribution (CSD) was studied in a group of peptides (molecular weight range 2.2 kDa to 3.5 kDa; CGRP, VIP, GLP1, CRF and PrRP). As expected, the result indicates that the ESI response is affected by the presence of additives: ammonium acetate shifted the observed charge states ratio whereas the addition of m-NBA resulted in the appearance of higher maximum charge state ions. This increase in higher charge state for all the peptide ions, [M + nH]ⁿ⁺ to [M + (n + 1)H]ⁿ⁺¹, was atttributed to protonation of the C-terminal. However, when the composition of MeCN in a mobile phase containing m-NBA was increased, an enhancement of the total ion signal was observed for non-polar peptide samples. This is a very interesting observation as this is not observed in samples without m-NBA and could be a result of how these peptide ions are solubilised and positioned relative to the droplet surface/air interface.

Keywords

ESI-MS electrolytes biologically-active peptides CSD

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blades

A.T.

Ikonomou

M.G.

Kebarle

, “Mechanism of electrospray mass-spectrometry—electrospray as an electrolysis cell”, Anal. Chem. 63(10), 2109 (1991). doi: 10.1021/ac00019a009

de la Mora

J.F.

, “Electrospray ionization of large multiply charged species proceeds via Dole's charged residue mechanism”, Anal. Chim. Acta 406(1), 93 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00601-7

Winger

B.E.

Lightwahl

K.J.

Loo

R.R.O.

Udseth

H.R.

Smith

R.D.

, “Observation and implications of high mass-to-charge ratio ions from electrospray-ionization mass-spectrometry”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 4(7), 536 (1993). doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(93)85015-P

Constantopoulos

T.L.

Jackson

G.S.

Enke

C.G.

, “Effects of salt concentration on analyte response using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 10(7), 625 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(99)00031-8

Felitsyn

Peschke

Kebarle

, “Origin and number of charges observed on multiply-protonated native proteins produced by ESI”, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 219(1), 39 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S1387-3806(02)00588-2

Verkerk

U.H.

Peschke

Kebarle

, “Effect of buffer cations and of H₃O⁺ on the charge states of native proteins. Significance to determinations of stability constants of protein complexes”, J. Mass Spectrom. 38(6), 618 (2003). doi: 10.1002/jms.475

Verkerk

U.H.

Kebarle

, “Ion–ion and ion–molecule reactions at the surface of proteins produced by nanospray. Information on the number of acidic residues and control of the number of ionized acidic and basic residues”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 16(8), 1325 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.03.018

Peschke

Blades

Kebarle

, “Charged states of proteins. Reactions of doubly protonated alkyldiamines with NH₃: Solvation or deprotonation. Extension of two proton cases to multiply protonated globular proteins observed in the gas phase”, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124(38), 11519 (2002). doi: 10.1021/ja012591e

Wang

G.D.

Cole

R.B.

, “Effects of solvent and counterion on ion pairing and observed charge states of diquaternary ammonium salts in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 7(10), 1050 (1996). doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(96)00051-7

10.

Wang

G.D.

Cole

R.B.

, “Effect of solution ionic-strength on analyte charge-state distributions in positive and negative-ion electrospray mass-spectrometry”, Anal. Chem. 66(21), 3702 (1994). doi: 10.1021/ac00093a026

11.

Kebarle

Verkerk

U.H.

, “Electrospray: From ions in solution to ions in the gas phase, what we know now”, Mass Spectrom. Rev. 28(6), 898, (2009). doi: 10.1002/mas.20247

12.

Iavarone

A.T.

Jurchen

J.C.

Williams

E.R.

, “Effects of solvent on the maximum charge state and charge state distribution of protein ions produced by electrospray ionization”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 11(11), 976 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(00)00169-0

13.

Iavarone

A.T.

Williams

E.R.

, “Mechanism of charging and supercharging molecules in electrospray ionization”, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125(8), 2319 (2003). doi: 10.1021/ja021202t

14.

Lomeli

S.H.

Yin

Loo

R.R.O.

Loo

J.A.

, “Increasing charge while preserving noncovalent protein complexes for ESI-MS”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20(4), 593 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.11.013

15.

Sterling

H.J.

Williams

E.R.

, “Origin of supercharging in electrospray ionization of noncovalent complexes from aqueous solution”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20(10), 1933 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2009.06.012

16.

Sterling

H.J.

Prell

J.S.

Cassou

C.A.

Williams

E.R.

, “Protein conformation and supercharging with DMSO from aqueous solution”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 22(7), 1178 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s13361-011-0116-x

17.

Samalikova

Grandori

, “Testing the role of solvent surface tension in protein ionization by electrospray”, J. Mass Spectrom. 40(4), 503 (2005). doi: 10.1002/jms.821

18.

Sterling

H.J.

Daly

M.P.

Feld

G.K.

Thoren

K.L.

Kintzer

A.F.

Krantz

B.A.

Williams

E.R.

, “Effects of supercharging reagents on noncovalent complex structure in electrospray ionization from aqueous solutions”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21(10), 1762 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2010.06.012

19.

Hogan

C.J.

Loo

R.R.O.

Loo

J.A.

de la Mora

J.F.

, “Ion mobility-mass spectrometry of phosphorylase B ions generated with supercharging reagents but in charge-reducing buffer”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12(41), 13476 (2010). doi: 10.1039/c0cp01208d

20.

Scarano

Fiorita

Picciotti

P.M.

Passali

G.C.

Calo

Cabras

Inzitari

Fanali

Mesana

Castagnola

Paludetti

, “Proteomics of saliva: Personal experience”, Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Ital. 30(3), 125 (2010).

21.

Abaye

D.A.

Pullen

F.S.

Nielsen

B.V.

, “Practical considerations in analysing neuropeptides, calcitonin gene-related peptide and vasoactive intestinal peptide, by nano-electrospray ionisation and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry: Monitoring multiple protonations”, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 25(8), 1107 (2011). doi: 10.1002/rcm.4961

22.

Mirza

U.A.

Chait

B.T.

, “Effects of anions on the positive-ion electrospray-ionization mass-spectra of peptides and proteins”, Anal. Chem. 66(18), 2898, (1994). doi: 10.1021/ac00090a017