Decomposition of Charge-State Distributions for a Better Understanding of Electrospray Mass Spectra of Bioorganic Compounds. Part 1: Basic Formalism

Abstract

Further development in our approach for the interpretation of a mass spectral peak series resulting from unique modifications at a number of molecular sites is described and its application for the analysis of electrospray mass spectra of multiply-charged ions of biopolymers is specified. This method was based initially on the assumption that the modifications are mutually independent. The output is a set of modification probabilities for the considered molecular sites, which explains the observed peak intensity distribution with the best accuracy. It is shown here that the method is also applicable, in some cases, to the strong interaction between modified sites. This is important for the formation of multiply-charged ions, at least in the gas phase, since it should be significantly influenced by the internal electric fields. The capabilities and limitations of this approach are discussed. One limitation is that only unimodal distributions (those having only one maximum) are possible in the considered model. Another is that relatively large biomolecules may not be suitable for this type of analysis. Some experimental results of the application of this method are described in Part 2 of this work.

Keywords

electrospray ionization charge–state distributions biopolymers ionogenic residues proton retention probabilities distribution decomposition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fenn

J.B.

Mann

Meng

C.K.

Wong

S.F.

Whitehouse

C.M.

, “Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules”, Science 246, 464 (1989). doi: 10.1126/science.2675315

Alexandrov

M.L.

Gall

L.N.

Krasnov

N.V.

Nikolaev

V.L.

Pavlenko

B.L.

Shkurov

V.A.

, “Method of mass spectrometry analysis of bioorganic compounds is a extraction of ions from solution by atmosphere pressure”, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 277, 379 (1984), (in Russian).

Ferrige

A.G.

Seddon

M.J.

Green

B.N.

Jarvis

S.A.

Skilling

, “Disentangling electrospray spectra with maximum entropy”, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 6, 707 (1992). doi: 10.1002/rcm.1290061115

Buijs

Hagman

Hakansson

Richter

J.H.

Hakansson

, “Inter-and intra-molecular migration of peptide amide hydrogens during electrospray ionization”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 12, 410 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(01)00204-5

Crestoni

M.E.

Fornarini

, “Gas-phase hydrogen/deuterium exchange of adenine nucleotides”, J. Mass Spectrom. 38, 854 (2003). doi: 10.1002/jms.498

Palmblad

Buijs

Hakansson

, “Automatic analysis of hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectra of peptides and proteins using calculations of isotopic distributions”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 12, 1153 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(01)00301-4

Xiao

Kaltashov

, “Transient structural disorder as a facilitator of protein–ligand binding: Native H/D exchange—mass spectrometry study of cellular retinoic acid binding protein I”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 16, 869 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.02.020

Julian

R.R.

, “Using ESI-MS to probe protein structure by site-specific noncovalent attachment of 18-crown-6”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 17, 1209 (2006). 10.1016/j.jasms.2006.05.007

Raznikova

M.O.

Raznikov

V.V.

, “Determination of the activity of H-atoms of ions of polyfunctional compounds on the basis of mass spectra of H/D exchange”, J. Adv. Chem. Phys. 4, 16 (2005).

10.

Kaltashov

I.A.

Abzalimov

R.R.

, “Do ionic charges in ESI MS provide useful information on macromolecular structure?”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 19, 1239–1246 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.05.018

11.

Lehninger

A.L.

, Principles of Biochemistry. Worth Publishers, Inc., New York, USA (1982).

12.

Dugas

Penney

, Bioorganic Chemistry. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA (1981).

13.

Rockwood

A.L.

Busman

Smith

R.D.

, “Coulombic effects in the dissociation of large highly charged ions”, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc. 111, 103 (1991). doi: 10.1016/0168-1176(91)85051-M

14.

Kelly

M.A.

Vestling

M.M.

Fenselau

C.C.

Smith

P.B.

, “Electrospray analysis of proteins: A comparison of positive-ion and negative-ion mass spectra at high and low pH”, Org. Mass Spectrom. 27, 1143 (1992). doi: 10.1002/oms.1210271028

15.

Bleiholder

Ch.

Suhai

Paizs

, “Revising the proton affinity scale of the naturally occuring α-amino acids”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 17, 1275 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2006.05.010

16.

Koroluk

Portenko

N.I.

Skorokhod

A.V.

Turbin

A.F.

, Handbook of the Theory of Probabilities and Mathematical Statistics. Nauka, Moscow, Russia (1985) (in Russian).

17.

Galambos

, Advanced Probability Theory. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA (1995).

18.

Raznikov

V.V.

Raznikova

M.O.

, “Deconvolution of overlapping mass spectral peaks following ion-counting data acquisition”, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc. 63, 157 (1985). doi: 10.1016/0168-1176(85)80023-9

19.

Raznikov

V.V.

Raznikova

M.O.

, “The regularized inverse convolution approach to resolving overlapping mass spectral peaks”, Ibid. 103, 67 (1991).

20.

Mohimen

Dobo

Hoerner

J.K.

Kaltashov

I.A.

, “A chemometric approach to detection and characterization of multiple protein conformers in solution using electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry”, Anal. Chem. 75, 4139 (2003). doi: 10.1021/ac034095+.

21.

Nguyen

Fenn

J.B.

, “Gas-phase ions of solute species from charged droplets of solutions”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1111 (2007). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609969104

22.

Grandori

, “Origin of the conformation dependence of protein charge–state distributions in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry”, J. Mass Spectrom. 38, 11 (2003). doi: 10.1002/jms.390

23.

Raznikov

V.V.

Dodonov

A.F.

Lanin

E.V.

, “Data acquisition and processing in high-resolution mass spectrometry using ion counting”, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 25, 295 (1977). doi: 10.1016/0020-7381(77)80056-9