Near infrared spectroscopy was used to discriminate between three sources of orange juice. Three pretreatments and five data transformations to improve discrimination were compared. Principal components analysis of 92 calibration samples was followed by canonical variates analysis using up to 25 principal components. Success rates were compared across pretreatments and transformations for the calibration and test data (50 samples). 100% prediction success was obtained with 25 principal components following no pretreatment and no transformation. Principal component loadings were interpretable.
HallM.N., Fruit Juice Authenticity. Food Technology International Europe 1992.Sterling Publications Ltd, pp. 197–201 (1992).
2.
CoweI.A., and McNicolJ.W., Appl. Spectrosc.39, 257 (1985).
3.
EvansD.G.JewellK. and HallM.N., Mathematical Interpretation of Complex Data Sets: (1) NIR Analysis of Mustard Seed Oil Content Predicted by Regression Methods.Campden Food & Drink Research Association Technical Memorandum No. 616 (1991).
4.
DevauxM.F.BertrandD.RobertP. and QannariM., Appl. Spectrosc.42, 1015 (1988).
5.
DowneyG.RobertP.BertrandD. and KellyP.M., Appl. Spectrosc.44, 150 (1990).
6.
MardiaK.V.KentJ.T. and BibbyJ.M., Multivariate Analysis.Academic Press (1979).
7.
MeurensM.EyndeP. and VanbellM., Proceedings of the International NIR/NIT Conference, Budapest. Ed. by HolloJ.KaffkaK.J., and GonezyJ. L. (1986).
8.
GeladiP.MacdougallD. and MartensH., Appl. Spectrosc.39, 491 (1985).
9.
BarnesR.J.DhanoaM.S. and ListerS.J., Appl. Spectrosc.43, 772 (1992).
10.
WilliamsP. and NorrisK., Near Infrared Technology in the Agricultural and Food Industries.American Association of Cereal Chemists (1987).
