Developing Robust Faecal near Infrared Spectroscopy Calibrations to Predict Diet Dry Matter Digestibility in Cattle Consuming Tropical Forages

Abstract

Various studies, mainly from temperate areas, have reported calibrations developed from the near infrared (NIR) spectra of faeces (F.NIRS) for predicting diet digestibility in ruminants and there has been substantial variation in predictive accuracy as indicated by calibration and validation statistics. The present study was conducted to develop and examine the reliability and robustness of F.NIRS calibration equations to estimate dry matter digestibility (DMD) of forage diets ingested by cattle grazing in the rangelands of northern Australia. A large and diverse calibration data set of matched diet–faecal pairs was obtained over 10 years using three sampling methods: (1) grazed pasture with diet samples collected from oesophageal fistulated steers and faeces collected from resident cattle; (2) in vivo digestibility experiments with penned cattle fed forage hays; and (3) penned cattle fed pasture freshly harvested from the field. Estimated in vivo DMD reference values were determined using pepsin–cellulase in vitro analysis of diet samples. The final calibration set of 1052 samples represented 264 diets with DMD ranging from 38% to 75%. Calibration statistics for DMD% were: standard error of calibration = 1.87, standard error of cross validation = 1.91, and the coefficient of determination, r² = 0.90. Factors of particular importance, with regard to the accuracy of DMD reference values, are identified and discussed and recommendations made for minimising reference errors. A comprehensive series of independent validation tests was conducted by selecting validation sample sets from the entire sample set according to a range of criteria. Each validation sub-set was tested using the calibration calculated from the remainder of the sample set. These tests showed that sampling method and experimental site often had important effects on calibration statistics and performance and also that the standard error of performance of the overall calibration would likely be <2.5 DMD percentage units when applied to samples sourced from regions and pasture types represented in the calibration. Despite the large size and diversity of the calibration data set it was concluded that robustness would likely be improved by expansion of the calibration data set.

Keywords

faecal NIR spectroscopy grazing cattle digestibility robustness miss-match error validation northern Australia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Minson

D.J.

, Forage in Ruminant Nutrition. Academic Press, New York, USA (1990).

Tilley

J.M.A.

and Terry

R.A.

, “A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops”, J. Br. Grassland Soc. 18, 104 (1963). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x

Jones

D.I.H.

and Hayward

M.V.

, “The effect of pepsin pre-treatment of herbage on the prediction of dry matter digestibility from solubility in fungal cellulase solutions”, J. Sci. Food Agric. 26, 711 (1975). doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740260518

McLeod

M.N.

and Minson

D.J.

, “The accuracy of the pepsin–cellulase technique for estimating the dry matter digestibility in vivo of grasses and legumes”, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 3, 277 (1978). doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(78)90002-0

Orskov

E.R.

, “The in situ technique for the estimation of forage degradability in ruminants”, in Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition, Ed by Givens

D.I.

Owens

Axford

R.F.E.

and Omed

H.M.

CAB International, Wallingford, UK (2000).

Lopez

, “In vitro and in situ techniques for estimating digestibility”, in Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism, 2nd Edn. Ed by Dijkstra

Forbes

J.M.

and France

CAB International, Wallingford, UK (2005).

Minson

D.J.

, “Effect of chemical composition on feed digestibility and metabolizable energy”, Nutr. Abstract Rev. B 52, 591 (1982).

Stern

M.D.

Bach

and Calsamiglia

, “Alternative techniques for measuring nutrient digestion in ruminants”, J. Anim. Sci. 75, 2256 (1997).

Beever

D.E.

and Mould

F.L.

, “Forage evaluation for efficient ruminant livestock production”, in Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition. Ed by Givens

D.I.

Owen

Axford

R.F.E.

and Omed

H.M.

CAB International, Wallingford, UK (2000). doi: 10.1079/9780851993447.0015

10.

Van Dyne

G.M.

and Torrel

D.T.

, “Development and use of the oesophageal fistula: A review”, J. Range Manage. 17, 7 (1964). doi: 10.2307/3895540

11.

McManus

W.R.

, “Oesophageal fistulation techniques as an aid to diet evaluation of the grazing ruminant” in Forage Evaluation: Concepts and Techniques, Ed by Wheeler

J.L.

and Mochrie

R.D.

CSIRO Australia and the American Forage and Grassland Council, Melbourne, Australia, p. 249 (1981).

12.

Coates

D.B.

Schachenmann

and Jones

R.J.

, “Reliability of extrusa samples collected from steers fistulated at the oesophagus to estimate the diet of resident animals in grazing experiments”, Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 27, 739 (1987). doi: 10.1071/EA9870739

13.

Jones

R.J.

and Lascano

C.E.

, “Oesophageal fistulated cattle can give unreliable estimates of the proportion of legume in the diets of resident animals grazing tropical pastures”, Grass Forage Sci. 47, 128 (1992). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1992.tb02255.x

14.

Clements

R.J.

Jones

R.M.

Valdes

L.R.

and Bunch

G.A.

, “Selection of Chamaecrista rotundifolia by cattle”, Trop. Grasslands 30, 389 (1996).

15.

Barber

G.D.

Givens

D.I.

Kridis

M.S.

Offer

N.W.

and Murray

, “Prediction of the organic matter digestibility of grass silage”, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 28, 115 (1990). doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(90)90074-I

16.

Givens

D.I.

and Deaville

E.R.

, “The current and future role of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy in animal nutrition: A review”, Aust. J. Agric. Res. 50, 1131 (1999). doi: 10.1071/AR98014

17.

Roberts

C.A.

Stuth

and Flinn

, “Analysis of forages and feedstuffs”, in Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Agriculture, Agronomy Monograph 44. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Winsconsin, USA. p. 231 (2004).

18.

Andres

Murray

Calleja

and Giraldez

F.J.

, “Review. Nutritive evaluation of forages by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy”, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. 13, 301 (2005). doi: 10.1255/jnirs.561

19.

Stuth

J.W.

Kapes

E.D.

and Lyons

R.K.

, “Use of near infrared spectroscopy to assess nutritional status of cattle diets on rangeland”, in Proceedings of the XVI International Grassland Congress, Nice, France. The French Grassland Society, Versailles, France, p. 889 (1989).

20.

Lyons

R.K.

and Stuth

J.W.

, “Fecal NIRS equations for predicting diet quality of free-ranging cattle”, J. Range Manage. 45, 238 (1992). doi: 10.2307/4002970

21.

Leite

E.R.

and Stuth

J.W.

, “Faecal NIRS equations to assess diet quality of free-ranging goats”, Small Rum. Res. 15, 223 (1995). doi: 10:1016/0921-4488(94)00026-4

22.

Dixon

R.M.

and Coates

D.B.

, “Review: Near infrared spectroscopy of faeces to evaluate the nutrition and physiology of herbivores”, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. 17, 1 (2009). doi: 10.1255/jnirs.822

23.

Decruyenaere

Lecomte

Demarquilly

Aufrere

Dardenne

Stilmant

and Buldgen

, “Evaluation of green forage intake and digestibility in ruminants using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): Developing a global calibration”, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 148, 138 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.03.007

24.

Coates

D.B.

and Mayer

R.J.

, “Differences between the in vitro digestibility of extrusa collected from oesophageal fistulated steers and the forage consumed”, Anim. Prod. Sci. 49, 563 (2009). doi: 10.1071/EA08285

25.

Coates

D.B.

, “Improving the accuracy of digestibility estimates for cattle grazing tropical pastures when sampling with oesophageal fistulated cattle”, Anim. Prod. Sci. 51, 44 (2011). doi: 10.1071/AN10131

26.

Coates

D.B.

, Faecal NIRS—Technology for Improving Nutritional Management of Grazing Cattle, Final Report of Project NAP3.121. Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney, Australia (2004).

27.

Coates

D.B.

Van der Weide

APA

and Kerr

J.D.

, “Changes in faecal δ¹³C in response to changing proportions of legume (C3) and grass (C4) in the diet of sheep and cattle”, J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 116, 287 (1991).

28.

Williams

, “Implementation of near-infrared technology”, in Near-Infrared Technology in the Agricultural and Food Industries, 2nd Edn, Ed by Williams

and Norris

American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc.

St Paul, Minnesota, USA (2001).

29.

Coates

D.B.

and Dixon

R.M.

, “Development of near infrared analysis of faeces to estimate non-grass proportions in diets selected by cattle grazing tropical pastures”, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. 16, 471 (2008). doi: 10.1255/jnirs.815

30.

Shenk

J.S.

and Westerhaus

M.O.

, Analysis of Agricultural and Food Products by Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy. Infrasoft International, NIRSystems, Port Matilda, USA (1993).

31.

Coates

D.B.

, “Is near infrared spectroscopy only as good as the laboratory reference values? An empirical approach”, Spectrosc. Eur. 14(4), 24 (2002).