Abstract
Sclerotherapy has been associated with 13 published cases of stroke since 1994. Four earlier reports implicated liquid sclerosants while nine recent cases have followed foam sclerotherapy. This adverse event represents a very rare complication of a very popular procedure. Ten of the 13 reported patients recovered completely with no long-term sequelae. A right-to-left shunt and in particular a patent foramen ovale (PFO) was the most consistent risk factor. Paradoxical gas emboli were observed in the brain-supplying or the intra-cranial arteries of five patients with an immediate onset of stroke after foam sclerotherapy. Paradoxical clot embolism was suspected in three patients with a delayed onset of stroke and concurrent venous thrombosis. In the remaining five cases, which included two cases with an immediate onset after liquid sclerotherapy, no specific cause was identified. Patients with a past history of cryptogenic stroke or a long life history of recurrent classic migraine attacks (with aura) have a higher risk of neurological adverse events and may benefit from preoperative screening and percutaneous closure of PFO.
Introduction
Serious neurological adverse events including rare cases of stroke have been reported following sclerotherapy. 1–11 The earlier reports implicated liquid sclerosants 1–4 but in the more recent publications, these events have followed foam sclerotherapy. 5–11
An ischaemic stroke is an acute neurological deficit of a presumed vascular origin associated with tissue infarction. A transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is a transient episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain, spinal cord or retinal ischaemia, without acute infarction. 12 Ischaemic stroke is the most common form of stroke reported in approximately 85% of all cases with the rest being haemorrhagic. 13,14 Nearly 30% of all ischaemic strokes are embolic, 15 30% atherothrombotic while up to 40% have no clearly identifiable cause and classified as cryptogenic. 16,17 The incidence of stroke in the general population is approximately 0.2%. 18 Stroke follows general surgery in 0.08–2.9% of cases. 19 The risk of stroke is higher following vascular procedures such as angiography (1.3%), 20 carotid artery stenting (1.5%), 21 carotid endarterectomy (2.3%) 22 and coronary artery bypass graft (8%). 23
The overall frequency of neurological complications of sclerotherapy is reported to be up to 2%. 24,25 Visual disturbances may occur in up to 14% of patients undergoing foam sclerotherapy, 26 but a recent systematic review found the overall incidence to be 1.4%. 27 In a private practice setting, two cases of stroke were reported following 4059 foam ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (UGS) procedures performed in a six-year period yielding an incidence of 0.01%. 10 In a report by the (British) National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, one case of stroke was reported in a series of 89 patients undergoing foam sclerotherapy. 28 In a British clinical audit data of 7027 patients who underwent 11,537 foam UGS procedures, no cases of stroke were reported. 29 In two randomized controlled trials of 148 and 95 patients, there were no reports of neurological complications. 30,31 In a survey of 281 British surgeons, one case of a TIA and two cases of stroke were reported. 32
Thirteen cases of stroke after sclerotherapy have been published since 1994. 1–10 In a 10-year period (1994–2004), four cases were reported to follow liquid sclerotherapy. 1–4 The first case to follow foam sclerotherapy appeared in 2006 and generated significant publicity. 5 In the ensuing four years (2006–2010), the number of published cases reached nine. 5–11 In two cases, 10 other venous procedures were performed concurrently. Although this apparent rise may suggest an increased risk attributed to foam sclerosants compared with liquid, it may well reflect an increase in the popularity of foam sclerotherapy and a rise in the total number of procedures performed. In France alone, up to 1.5 million sessions of sclerotherapy are performed each year. 25 In a prospective French registry of 12,173 sclerotherapy procedures, no cases of stroke were reported. 25 Therefore, stroke ultimately remains a very rare but significant complication of a very popular procedure.
An acute stroke leads to death in up to 30% of patients within the first 30 days of the adverse event. 33 Death in the first week is due to the stroke itself in 90% of cases, while pulmonary embolism (PE) is the most common cause of death within 2–4 weeks of the acute event. Ten of the 13 patients reviewed here recovered completely while the other three had a partial recovery at the time of the original publication. None died during the reported follow-up periods.
This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding cerebrovascular events following sclerotherapy. Possible pathogenic mechanisms are discussed and a simple management strategy is proposed.
Review criteria and methods
From December 2008 to December 2010, electronic databases (Medline, PubMed, Scopus and general engines) were searched for articles published since 1966 focusing on sclerotherapy, stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO). The search terms included ‘sclerotherapy’, ‘foam’, ‘stroke’, ‘TIA’, ‘patent foramen ovale’, ‘paradoxical embolism’, ‘gas or air embolism’, ‘endovenous ablation’, ‘varicose vein surgery’ and ‘stripping’. The retrieved case reports were in English, German and French. The full-text of each publication was obtained and authors were personally contacted when the required case details were not included in the original publications. The publications reviewed included a number of individual case reports, case series and registries which may have been influenced by less rigorous monitoring of data collection and interpretation, and hence constitute weak evidence.
Paradoxical embolism
Diagnostic criteria
Paradoxical embolism, first described by Connheim in 1877, is the transmission of a venous embolus to the arterial circulation via a defect in the cardiac septum or a pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (AVM). 34,35
The traditional diagnostic criteria for paradoxical embolism include:
36–38
Arterial embolism with no evidence of a source in the left heart or arterial circulation; An abnormal communication between the right and left circulations; Confirmation of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or PE; A pressure gradient (although transient) that would favour a right-to-left shunt (RLS).
These diagnostic criteria are mostly of historical significance and despite substantial advancements in imaging modalities, the diagnosis of paradoxical embolism has remained dependent on circumstantial rather than direct evidence. For instance, criterion 4 is generally assumed and virtually never measured. Criterion 3 does not account for clot emboli originating from superficial veins or paradoxical gas, septic, fat or other emboli. Finally, in legs paralysed by stroke, it may be difficult to identify whether a DVT was the cause or the result of the stroke.
39
The foramen ovale
The pulmonary circulation is virtually bypassed in fetal circulation. The fetal lungs are collapsed and the placental blood enters the right atrium from the inferior vena cava and crosses into the left atrium via the foramen ovale. The foramen ovale is an opening in the interatrial septum that functions as a one-way valve to allow RLS of oxygenated blood in utero. Ductus arteriosus, a shunt connecting the pulmonary artery to the aortic arch, is the other fetal cardiac shunt that allows blood entering the right ventricle to bypass the pulmonary circulation. When the lungs expand at birth, the pulmonary pressure is reduced, which draws the blood from the right atrium into the right ventricle and onto the pulmonary circulation. This results in an increase in the left atrial pressure causing a functional closure of the foramen ovale. In the first two years of life, the subsequent fusion and fibrosis of the foramen ovale causes a permanent closure of this shunt forming the fossa ovalis in the adult heart. 40
Patent foramen ovale
PFO is a persistent inter-atrial opening resulting from incomplete fusion of the foramen ovale after birth. This abnormality may be hereditary in some families and is associated with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. 41 PFO is found in up to 30% of the population 42 and in up to 60% of patients with cryptogenic strokes (Table 1). 43 Autopsy findings report the frequency of PFO to be even higher at 40% in adult hearts and the mean PFO diameter to be 4.9 mm. 44 Even a higher prevalence of a RLS (38.5% at rest, 51.5% after Valsalva) was found in patients with symptomatic great saphenous incompetence and varicose veins. 45 The prevalence of PFO diminishes to 20% while the average diameter increases to 5.8 mm at 80 years of age. 46 This is presumably due to spontaneous closure of smaller shunts with age. 44 The incidence of PFO is not affected by gender.
Reported incidences of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in various populations
Right- to-left shunt
A RLS is a communication that allows the venous blood to enter the arterial circulation by flowing through the heart. PFO is the most common cause of a RLS found in 70% of cases but other cardiac defects such as ventricular septal defect or atrial septal defect (ASD) can also result in a RLS. 47 Extracardiac shunts with a reported prevalence of 10% can also produce a RLS. The most common extra-cardiac shunts are pulmonary AVMs through which paradoxical emboli reach the left atrium via the pulmonary vein. 44
Normally, the left atrial pressure is higher than the right side which keeps a PFO closed. The right atrial pressure is elevated during Valsalva manoeuvres, coughing and early systole which can open the PFO and allow a transient RLS. 48,49 Pulmonary arterial hypertension (that can follow PE) can increase the right atrial pressure inducing a RLS via a PFO. A PFO has a valve-like nature which would only permit a RLS, whereas a true ASD allows bidirectional flow. 50
Sources of paradoxical embolism
The most presumed source of paradoxical embolism is lower limb DVT reported in approximately 90% of all cases while pelvic vein thrombosis may act as a rare source. 51 Thrombi could also form in situ within a PFO and enter the arterial circulation during an increase in the right atrial pressure. 52 Rarely, a PFO may ‘trap’ larger thrombi that would otherwise embolize to the brain. 53 Clots arising from the left heart, for example during transient atrial arrhythmias, may also embolize to the brain but would no longer be defined as ‘paradoxical’. 54
PFO, stroke and migraine
PFO has been implicated in a range of clinical conditions including stroke, migraine, decompression illness in scuba divers and cerebral fat embolism. 55,56 Up to 40% of ischaemic strokes reported in young people are cryptogenic. 39,57 The prevalence of PFO is higher in patients with cryptogenic stroke (60%) compared with the 30% prevalence in the general population (Table 1). 43 Furthermore, the presence of a PFO significantly increases the risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events. 39,58 Patients with cryptogenic stroke and a PFO are twice as likely to suffer from migraines compared with those without PFO. 59 The prevalence of PFO is higher in patients with migraine headaches (up to 60%; Table 1), 39,60,61 but this seems to be influenced by the migraine subtype. Patients with classic migraines (with aura) are more likely to have a PFO than those with common migraines (without aura) or those without migraines altogether. 62 Similarly, although the overall risk of stroke in migraine patients remains low, 63 the relative risk is higher for classic migraine compared with common migraine. 64 In addition, patients with classic migraine are reported to have an increased prevalence of sub-clinical posterior circulation infarcts compared with those with common migraines. 65 An entity that needs to be differentiated is the hemiplegic migraine which can closely mimic a stroke. 66
Detection of PFO
Methods
Contrast transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) is the ‘gold standard’ method for detection of PFO. 46 Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is less invasive but it can miss up to 53% of cases. 67 Transcranial Doppler (TCD) can be used to detect air microemboli entering the middle cerebral artery (MCA) but will miss emboli entering the posterior circulation. Furthermore, despite the reported sensitivity of 90%, 68 TCD detects air microemboli from any source including cardiac and extra-cardiac shunts and is therefore not a specific method for detection of PFO. 69
Bubble Study
A ‘Bubble Study’ is performed during echocardiography and TCD to detect a RLS. This involves an intravenous injection of a froth of air-saline microbubbles as a contrast agent. 70 The froth is usually prepared by agitating 0.5–1 mL of room air mixed with saline in a 1 + 4 (1 in 5) ratio. A maximum of 10 mL of this froth is usually injected in one session. These injections are performed at rest and after a calibrated Valsalva manoeuvre (40 mmHg for 10 seconds as measured by spirometry) or maximal Valsalva manoeuvre. 46 For detection with echocardiography, the presence of a shunt is diagnosed when microbubbles have been visualized in the left atrium or ventricle within three cardiac cycles of right atrial opacification. 46 Alternative to the saline froth, commercially available ultrasound contrast agents such as galactose or dextrose may be used. The agitated saline froth is reported to be as sensitive as the commercial agents. 71
Bubble Study and stroke
Cerebral ischaemic events including rare cases of ischaemic stroke have followed the ‘Bubble Study’ using the agitated saline froth. 72 The presence of a RLS was the common feature of all reported events. The key risk factor was the injection of larger bubbles that would aggregate to occlude downstream vasculature. 72 This has been attributed to the use of larger needles, a non-vertical injection angle (due to buoyancy, larger bubbles ascend to the top when the syringe is held vertical) and inadequate agitation. All these events occurred during or within five minutes of the injection of the froth during the ‘Bubble Study’.
Treatment of PFO
Paradoxical emboli pose a potential risk to patients with PFO and closure procedures are performed to reduce this risk. 73 Treatment options have included surgical closure as well as interventional procedures including transcatheter techniques. 39 The surgical approach, mostly used to prevent recurrent cryptogenic strokes, requires cardiopulmonary bypass and is associated with complications such as cardiac tamponade and ventricular fibrillation. The transcatheter method is minimally invasive and involves the percutaneous implantation of a PFO closure device to occlude the inter-atrial septal defect. A recurrence rate of up to 6% is associated with various closure devices and the reported complications are infrequent. 39 PFO and other septal defects provide an escape route for arterial hypertension and in the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension, closure of PFO is contraindicated.
Thromboembolism and sclerotherapy
Deep vein thrombosis
The true incidence of DVT following sclerotherapy is unknown and most publications include clinically (and not ultrasonically) detected DVTs. In the French registry of 12,173 procedures, only one proximal vein and five cases of calf vein thrombosis were reported. 25 In the Australian Polidocanol Study, three cases of DVT (0.02%) were detected following 16,804 sclerotherapy procedures with polidocanol. 74 In a clinical audit data of foam UGS in 7027 patients (11,537 procedures) from nine UK centres, 36 patients (0.5%) were diagnosed with DVT. 29
The incidence of venous thromboembolic events following sclerotherapy is possibly higher as a significant number of procedural DVTs may be silent. 75 In a study by Gillet et al., 24 1025 patients underwent foam UGS. Duplex ultrasound screening was performed between the eighth and 30th day in the majority of patients. Eleven thromboembolic events (1.07%) were reported which included 10 DVTs and one PE. Five DVTs were asymptomatic. Similarly, Bergan 76 has reported an incidence of 1.8%. In a study by Myers et al., 77 489 patients underwent 1189 foam UGS procedures. Duplex ultrasound screening revealed 16 cases of DVT (3.2%) all of which were asymptomatic. 77 The reported frequency of 1–3% is similar to the author's experience. 75 Treatment factors that might influence the risk of deep vein occlusion (thrombosis or sclerosis) following foam sclerotherapy have been reviewed. 78
Pulmonary embolism
In earlier publications, PE followed sclerotherapy of small superficial vessels with a reported incidence of one in 250 to one in 1000. 79–81 In the study by Gillet et al., 24 one case of PE was reported in 1025 patients. In the French registry of 12,173 procedures and the Australian Polidocanol Study involving 16,804 legs injected with polidocanol, no cases of PE were reported. 25,74 There are no data regarding the incidence of silent PE following sclerotherapy.
Concurrent PE is found in 5% of the diagnosed cases of paradoxical embolism. 82 Patients with PE and a PFO > 4 mm have a 10-fold increased risk of death and five-fold increased risk of systemic embolism. 53 Concurrent PE has been reported in only one case of stroke after sclerotherapy. 2
Superficial venous thrombosis
Clots originating in superficial veins can rarely embolize and PE is reported in up to 3% of all cases of superficial thrombophlebitis (STP). 83 In the French registry, only three cases of STP were reported following 12,173 procedures. 25 Although histologically, venous sclerosis (collagen deposition resulting in scar formation), venous thrombosis (intravascular fibrin clot formation) and venous thrombophlebitis (clot formation accompanied by an inflammatory infiltrate) are separate entities, these conditions are not always clinically or sonographically differentiated. 84 Clinically, the diagnosis of venous thrombosis in a superficial vein has relied heavily on the co-presence of an inflammatory (phlebitic) component and hence superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) without an inflammatory component is possibly under-diagnosed in sclerotherapy patients. Even sonographically, SVT may be misdiagnosed as the thrombotic occlusion of a superficial vein and dismissed as an expected outcome of sclerotherapy (see below).
Failure to detect venous thrombosis on ultrasound in sclerotherapy patients
An acute venous thrombosis may remain undiagnosed and under-reported in sclerotherapy patients due to a variety of reasons:
Lack of screening
The diagnosis of postsclerotherapy DVT is generally made on a clinical basis and screening for DVT is not routinely performed after sclerotherapy. As reported by Myers et al., 77 up to 100% of DVTs after sclerotherapy may be asymptomatic. This may explain the general low incidence of DVTs reported in larger trials where no routine screening was performed. Sclerotherapy itself is associated with post-procedural symptoms and signs that may mask those of a DVT.
Failure to detect deep vein thrombosis
Duplex ultrasound is the most common method used to screen for DVT. Ultrasound is an operator-dependent modality and can be associated with a false-negative error rate. 85,86 This may be due to the local or institutional scanning protocols, inadequate technology or even the operator's inexperience. For instance, although PE is reported in up to 11% of patients with asymptomatic calf vein thrombosis, 87 calf veins and in particular anterior tibial veins are not routinely screened for thrombosis in some institutes.
Failure to diagnose superficial vein thrombosis
Non-compressibility on ultrasound is used as a marker of successful sclerotherapy. However, non-compressibility is a general feature of thrombosis, vessel sclerosis/fibrosis as well as vessel wall fibrosis despite a patent lumen which may contain running blood or the postsclerotherapy coagulum. Other features such as echogenicity (representing fibrosis) and a reduced vessel diameter should be used to confirm sclerosis. 75 The lack of standardized, valid and reliable diagnostic criteria may lead to a sonographic under-reporting of SVT.
Imaging after the embolization
Clots originating in the treated superficial trunks may extend into adjoining deep veins and embolize before the imaging is performed. Dislodgement of a loose thrombus from the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) was diagnosed in one case 9 and suspected in another case 8 of stroke after sclerotherapy.
Other sources
Thrombosis may occur coincidentally in a contralateral lower limb, upper limb, pelvic veins or other sources not imaged. 51 Although rare, thrombi could form within the PFO tunnel (the ‘lurking clot’ theory) and enter the systemic circulation during an increase in the right atrial pressure. 52 Non-thrombotic emboli, such as septic and crystal emboli, are less likely to originate from the venous system.
Neurological events and sclerotherapy
Transient events
Transient neurological events such as visual disturbances and migraine following both liquid and foam sclerotherapy have been associated with the presence of a RLS and in particular a PFO. 32,88 Visual disturbances following foam sclerotherapy have been attributed to classic migraine attacks rather than TIAs. 26 Endothelin-1, a vasoconstrictor, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of migraine and has been shown to be released after sclerotherapy in an animal model. 89 Serotonin, another vasoconstrictor, is also implicated in the pathogenesis of migraine. 90 Serotonin modulates vasoreactivity in normal and atherosclerotic arteries, and contributes to cerebral ischaemia. 91–93 In in vitro experiments, low concentration sodium tetradecyl sulphate (STS) induces serotonin release from activated platelets. 94 Although sclerotherapy is known to induce venoconstriction of the target vessels, 31 arterial vasospasm or vasoconstriction at distant sites has not been studied.
There are few published reports of TIA following sclerotherapy (Table 2). 6,24,95–97 Both gas and clot microemboli can cause transient neurological dysfunction, 98 with recovery when the emboli have lysed and the circulation is restored. 99,100 All reported cases of TIA after sclerotherapy had an immediate onset and a RLS was documented in all these cases (Table 2). Four cases followed the use of air-based foams and one case reported back in 1994 followed sclerotherapy with hypertonic saline in a patient with an atrial septal aneurysm (ASA). In none of these patients a concurrent deep or superficial venous thrombosis was identified.
Published cases of stroke following liquid (Table 2a) and foam (Table 2b) sclerotherapy and transient ischaemic attacks (TIA, Table 2c)
AP, ambulatory phlebectomy; ASA, atrial septal aneurysm; ASD, atrial septal defect; CG, chromated glycerin; DSS, double syringe system; DVS, direct vision sclerotherapy; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; EVLA, endovenous laser ablation; F, female; Giac, Giacomini; GSV, great saphenous vein; HS, hypertonic saline; Immed, immediately; M, male; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MGV, medial gastrocnemius vein; NA, not applicable; O2, oxygen; OCP, oral contraceptive pill; PAV, posterior arch vein; PCE, paradoxical clot embolism; PE, pulmonary embolism; PGE, paradoxical gas embolism; PFO, patent foramen ovale; POL, polidocanol; PTV, posterior tibial vein; Retics, reticular veins; RLS, right-to-left shunt; SCA, superior cerebellar artery; SFJ, saphenofemoral junction; SSV, small saphenous vein; STS, sodium tetradecyl sulphate; STP, superficial thrombophlebitis; Tels, telangiectasias; TIA, transient ischaemic attack; TOE, trans-oesophageal echocardiogram; UGS, ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy; VA, vertebral artery; VTE, venous thromboembolism
*Personal communication with the authors
Stroke
Clinical features
Thirteen cases of postsclerotherapy stroke (PSS) have been published since 1994 (Tables 2). 1–11 Four cases followed liquid 1–4 and nine followed foam sclerotherapy. 5–11 This group consisted of 11 women and two men with an average age of 48 years. 33–65 There was no history of a previous stroke in 11 patients and in two patients this information was not available. The most consistent risk factor was the presence of a RLS and in particular a PFO.
Immediate onset
Seven PSS cases (5 foam, 2 liquid) had an immediate onset, defined as an event occurring during or up to 20 minutes after the procedure (Table 2). The median time interval between the procedure and stroke in the immediate cases was 0 minutes (intraoperative); mean of four and maximum of 20 minutes. Embolic bubbles were visualized in all five foam cases; four on neuroimaging and one on sonography of the carotid arteries.
In both liquid cases, calf varicosities were directly injected. In none of these cases, concurrent venous thrombosis or thrombophilia was demonstrated.
Delayed onset
Six PSS cases (2 liquid, 4 foam) had a delayed onset, defined as an event occurring 1–5 days after the procedure. The median time interval between the procedure and stroke in the delayed cases was 2.5 days; maximum, five days. In one liquid and one foam case, concurrent DVT was detected and in one foam case an extension of thrombus from the SFJ into the deep venous system was demonstrated. None of the patients tested were found to have a thrombophilic abnormality.
Arterial territories
Nine of the 13 PSS cases involved the MCA, two involved the superior cerebellar artery and in two cases no arterial occlusion was identified on imaging. MCA is by far the largest cerebral artery and is the most commonly affected vessel in all cases of ischaemic stroke. 101 Anatomically, MCA is a continuation of the internal carotid artery which would make this artery a common site for lodgement of emboli. 102 MCA supplies most of the lateral cerebral cortex with deep branches supplying the basal ganglia and the internal capsules. Infarcts within the vast distribution of this vessel lead to diverse neurological sequelae. An infarct involving the dominant hemisphere (usually the left hemisphere, since most individuals are right-handed) may result in a variety of speech disturbances reported in the published cases of PSS (Table 2).
Probable pathogenic mechanisms
All reported PSS cases have been ischaemic and so far no haemorrhagic cases have been reported. In 10 of the 13 published cases, a RLS was identified and hence paradoxical embolism was considered the most probable cause of stroke (Table 2). In the remaining three, one patient was examined with TTE only (and not TOE), 1 a non-cardiac shunt was suspected in one case 7 and further information was not available in the other case. 11
The underlying pathogenic mechanisms in PSS can be categorized into:
Paradoxical gas embolism (PGE); Paradoxical clot embolism (PCE); Idiopathic.
1. Paradoxical gas embolism
Gas embolism is a well-known complication of cardiopulmonary bypass, neurosurgery and laproscopic surgery. Venous gas embolism (VGE) is the entry and embolisation of gas in the central venous system. PGE occurs through the direct passage of gas into the arterial system of the cerebral and coronary circulations via a RLS. 47,103–105 Even in the absence of a RLS, VGE resulting in a retrograde flow of gas via the jugular veins can cause cerebral infarction. 106
Detergent sclerosants in the liquid form are usually mixed with a gas at a specific ratio such as 1 + 4 (1 unit of liquid, 4 units of gas) to generate a sclerosing foam. 107 Bubbles are observed on concurrent echocardiography and TCD to enter the right heart, and in the presence of a RLS onto the brain-supplying and intracranial circulation during foam sclerotherapy. 5,6,88,97,108,109 Imaging of embolic bubbles can be challenging and even in the presence of severe neurological abnormalities, imaging for gas emboli can be negative as air and CO2 are absorbed rapidly. 110–114 Nonetheless, gas bubbles were visualized in the brain-supplying or intracranial arteries of five patients, all with an immediate onset after foam sclerotherapy. In one case, the patient underwent concurrent ambulatory phlebectomy (AP). 11 A rapid onset is the key feature of PGE, also reported in all cases of cerebral ischaemia following the echocardiogram ‘Bubble Study’ (see above Bubble Study and Stroke). 72
The mechanism of infarction in PGE may be due to:
Direct physical occlusion of intracranial arteries by gas bubbles; Bubble-induced vasospasm and activation of the coagulation system resulting in secondary thrombotic occlusion.
In the first instance, bubble coalescence leads to formation of large enough bubbles that would physically occlude intracranial arteries resulting in ischaemia and tissue infarction. Bubble contact can otherwise cause cerebral vasospasm with subsequent delayed ischaemic deficits.
115
Bubble contact can also affect the vascular endothelium
116–118
resulting in activation of the coagulation system, platelet aggregation and a thrombo-inflammatory response.
119,120
These factors can combine to result in a thrombotic occlusion secondary to gas exposure.
106
Secondary thrombosis following bubble exposure was reported in one PSS patient where thrombi were observed in the affected artery following the dissolution of the gas emboli.
7
Bubbles can also cause a progressive decline in cerebral blood flow even if they do not completely occlude vessels.
117,121
The nomenclature referring to the observed bubbles has been varied and often less than accurate. Various authors have used a range of designations including ‘foam particles’, ‘foam bubbles’, ‘foam emboli’, ‘foam microemboli’ and ‘echogenic particles’. Sclerosant ‘foam’ is a substance comprised of gas bubbles trapped in the liquid sclerosant. What is observed on echocardiograms or neck ultrasound studies following foam sclerotherapy is a shower of bubbles. 5,109 Currently, we have no clinical or imaging evidence that the bubbles observed in the carotid arteries or heart are trapped or float in the original liquid sclerosant, carry a surfactant layer of detergent or have any sclerosing activity. In fact, the limited data available point to the opposite (see below 3. Idiopathic and other causes). Hence, designations that imply the presence of active sclerosant or a sclerosant film on the surface of the embolic bubbles are not justified by the available evidence. It has also been suggested that the observed echogenic particles may indeed be endothelial cell debris. Although the presence of endothelial derived biological products such as microparticles cannot be ruled out, the observed echogenicity and the ring-down artefact is a typical sonographic feature of gas bubbles. 122
2. Paradoxical clot embolism
In general, gas embolism is associated with an immediate/rapid onset of symptoms although in rare cases it can present with a delayed onset. 123 A delayed onset has been the key feature of thrombotic complications of sclerotherapy as reported in the French registry of 12,173 procedures. 25 A concurrent DVT was detected in only two of the PSS patients and in a third case, an extension of thrombus from the saphenofemoral junction into the deep venous system was observed (Table 2). These three cases had a delayed onset of a few days after the procedure. No concurrent venous thrombosis was detected in the remaining three cases with a delayed onset (Table 2). The failure to detect a concurrent venous thrombosis does not rule out such pathology and may be due to a variety of reasons discussed earlier (see above Failure to detect venous thrombosis on ultrasound in sclerotherapy patients). In addition, the contribution of other pathogenic mechanisms in these patients cannot be ruled out (see below 3. Idiopathic and other causes).
Co-presence of PFO and thrombophilic abnormalities including factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutations significantly increases the risk of cryptogenic stroke. 124 None of the PSS patients tested were diagnosed with thrombophilia but two had coagulation abnormalities including elevated D-dimer levels in the absence of concurrent DVT (Table 2). 1,4 This is not unique to sclerotherapy patients as increased levels of fibrinopeptide A and D-dimer levels have been documented for up to four weeks in other stroke patients, suggestive of ongoing fibrin formation and fibrinolysis. 125 Moreover, sclerotherapy in the absence of concurrent DVT can result in the elevation of D-dimer levels. 126 D-dimer levels may also be elevated in a number of chronic conditions 127,128 and the observed elevations could have antedated the onset of stroke.
3. Idiopathic and other causes
No gas or clot emboli could be demonstrated in five of the 13 PSS patients reviewed here (2 with an immediate onset after liquid sclerotherapy, 3 with a delayed onset; Table 2). Even in cases attributed to PGE based on the visualization of gas emboli, and those attributed to PCE based on the detection of a concurrent DVT, a contribution from other pathogenic mechanisms cannot be ruled out.
The complexity of this topic is illustrated by the neurological ischaemic events with an immediate onset following liquid sclerotherapy. Such events were reported in two PSS cases 1,3 and in one case of post-sclerotherapy. 95 Clearly, PGE in such cases would be a remote possibility and the immediate onset renders the local formation of thrombus and its instant embolization from the calf to the brain a less likely cause. Furthermore, in none of these patients a concurrent deep or superficial venous thrombosis was diagnosed. Liquid sclerotherapy is also associated with transient neurological symptoms such as migraine and visual disturbances with an immediate onset. 95 Such complications may be classified as distant adverse events of sclerosants and may be postulated to be due to a direct effect of the sclerosing agents or mediated by secondary biological by-products of sclerosants.
Currently, there is no evidence that detergent sclerosants maintain their sclerosing or surfactant activity at distant sites and although foam generated bubbles are routinely visualized to enter the cardiac chambers, there is no evidence that such bubbles carry a surfactant layer with detergent properties. Detergent sclerosants are strongly neutralized by blood cell membranes, 94 albumin and other plasma proteins 129 and blood samples collected from the cardiac chambers in an animal study have shown no sclerosing activity. 130 It is unlikely for the injected agents to maintain direct sclerosing activity at distant sites and the observed distant adverse events are most likely mediated by the release of cellular and other biological by-products of sclerosants.
Detergent sclerosants are biologically active and interfere with the coagulation, antithrombotic and fibrinolytic mechanisms in vitro. 129,131,132 Clinically, low-concentration sclerosants have been reported to cause visual disturbances and neurological complications. 133 Low-concentration detergent sclerosants have been shown to activate platelets and release procoagulant platelet-derived microparticles (PMP) in vitro. 94,129,131 A rise in plasma levels of PMPs is associated with arterial thrombotic events, 134 stroke 135–137 and myocardial infarction. 138 In other in vitro studies, low concentration sclerosants demonstrate a prothrombotic antifibrinolytic profile as evident by an increase in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA)/PAI-1 complexes, alpha-2 antiplasmin and thrombin activatable fibrinolyisis inhibitor. 139 A systemic rise in the inhibitors of fibrinolysis has been associated with stroke, acute coronary occlusion 140,141 venous, 142 and arterial thrombosis. 143
Apart from thrombosis, platelet and endothelial by-products may result in sustained vasospasm and secondary thrombotic occlusion. One such vasoconstrictor is serotonin released from activated platelets. In in vitro experiments, serotonin has been recently shown to be released by activated platelets when stimulated by low concentration STS. 94 Another vasoconstrictor, endothelin-1, 144 was also shown to be released after sclerotherapy in an animal model. 89 Sustained cerebral vasospasm may result in delayed ischaemic deficits. 115
The release of cell-derived by-products of sclerosants possibly plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of neurological and other complications of sclerotherapy and need to be investigated in detailed clinical studies.
Finally, a coincidental event due to general causes of stroke should be considered in cases where a procedure-related paradoxical gas or clot embolism has been ruled out.
Procedural variables and risk factors
Not all patients with PFO develop neurological symptoms after sclerotherapy. Despite the 30% prevalence of PFO in the general population, neurological events are reported in only up to 2% of patients undergoing sclerotherapy. Presence of bubbles in the cerebral circulation does not always result in symptoms or ischaemic events. 88 Furthermore, in some of the published cases, the same patients underwent previous sclerotherapy treatments with no neurological complications. 10 Therefore, variable risk factors such as treatment parameters and individual's personal risk factors at the time of the procedure (eg. recent travel, malignancy and other risk factors predisposing to venous thrombosis) possibly play a critical role in the pathogenesis of adverse outcomes.
Patient's position during procedure
Patients undergoing sclerotherapy are usually treated in the recumbent position. The risk of PGE is increased in the sitting position. 120,145 A number of manoeuvres (such as keeping the patient supine for a few minutes after the procedure and leg elevation before, during or after the procedure) were recommended to prevent VGE. 146–150 Recent studies have shown these manoeuvres to be ineffective in prevention of VGE. 109,151 Leg elevation was performed in all four PSS cases with an immediate onset of stroke (Table 2). Prolonged supine position does not prevent bubbles from reaching the right heart but may reduce the bolus volume compared with immediate sitting up or standing at the completion of the procedure.
Sclerosing agents
Both STS (6 foam cases) and polidocanol (3 foam cases, 3 liquid) were implicated in the published cases of PSS (Tables 2). The other sclerosant reported was chromated glycerine (a liquid chemical irritant). One case of TIA followed the use of hypertonic saline in a patient with an ASA. 95 Based on the limited data, no conclusion can be drawn regarding the risk associated with particular sclerosants and randomised prospective studies are required to examine the relevant risk.
Sclerosing format
Four PSS cases have followed liquid 1–4 and nine have followed foam sclerotherapy. 5–11 The apparent rise in the number of cases associated with foam sclerosants may be due to the massive popularity of foam sclerotherapy and given the limited data, no conclusion can be drawn regarding the possible increased risk associated with one particular format. However, PGE would be a very unlikely complication of liquid sclerotherapy.
Sclerosant concentration
A wide range of sclerosant concentrations were reported in the published cases of PSS. These agents were occasionally used at low concentrations and in very small volumes treating sub-dermal vessels. 4 In in vitro experiments, low concentration sclerosants exhibit prothrombotic antifibrinolytic activity 139 and initiate strong clots. 152 At mid-range concentrations (0.15% STS, 0.15–0.3% POL), both agents initiate loose clots prone to lysis while at high concentrations (>0.3%) both inhibit clot formation. 152 The thrombotic activity described in these in vitro studies relates to the ‘free’ final intravascular concentrations. Such ‘free’ concentrations are determined by the degree of mixing with blood and the subsequent neutralization by blood cells and plasma proteins. 129 Hence, although the initial concentration injected by the practitioner may be high, the final intravascular concentration can drop substantially to a ‘pro-coagulant window’. 129
The foaming gas
Air, carbon dioxide (CO2) or a combination of oxygen and CO2 are used to generate sclerosant foam. 107,153 Room air, which contains 72% nitrogen, was used in all published cases of PSS (Table 2). CO2 was used in one case of TIA after foam sclerotherapy, 97 100% oxygen in one case 24 and room air in the remaining two cases (Table 2). So far, stroke has not been associated with the use of CO2 foam and the reported neurological symptoms have been transient. 130,150,154 CO2 is approximately 20 times more soluble in blood than oxygen and nitrogen is the least soluble gas. 155 CO2 has not been used as much as air in foam sclerotherapy and is reported to produce fewer adverse reactions compared with air. 108 As a contrast agent, CO2 in up to 200–300 mL is injected intravenously during venography especially in renal disease or if there is a history of hypersensitivity to contrast agents. 156 CO2 is also used in a number of arterial access procedures including aortagraphy, renal and visceral angiography, transcatheter embolization and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. CO2 as an arterial contrast agent can cause PGE to spinal, coronary, and cerebral arteries especially when used in sites above the diaphragm. 155,156 Injection of 20 mL of CO2 in an arteriovenous fistula has resulted in cerebral infarction and there are other cases of stroke associated with the use of CO2 in this setting. 110 Individual CO2 bubbles are estimated to dissolve within 2–3 minutes. 155 However, in a recent study by the author, CO2 bubbles arrived in the right heart within 60 seconds and continued for another 25 minutes following a single injection of 2.5 mL of sclerosant foam in a small saphenous vein. 109 Similar findings have been reported by Morrison et al. 150
Total volume of sclerosant
Neurological symptoms are reported with as little as 20 mL of air injected intravenously. 106 In humans, an intravenous injection of 200–300 mL of air (5 mL/kg) has been fatal. 157 Much lower volumes can be fatal in the presence of a RLS or in critically ill patients. 158 Injection of 2–3 mL of air into the cerebral circulation can be fatal. 159
In the PSS cases following liquid sclerotherapy, relatively small volumes of liquid sclerosants (0.5–4 mL, mean 2.1 mL) were injected (Table 2). In cases following foam sclerotherapy, a wide range of volumes (2–25 mL, mean 12 mL, median 7 mL) were used (Table 2). The second European Consensus on foam sclerotherapy set an upper limit of 10 mL of foam per treatment session. 160 The Australasian College of Phlebology Consensus recommendations have set this limit at 20 mL per session. 161 In a recent study, Morrison et al. 108 compared the adverse effects of CO2-based foam with a historical control using air-based foam. For volumes >15 mL, the incidence of complications were not directly related to the volume of foam injected. At higher volumes, the choice of foaming gas played a role and CO2-based foam sclerosants were found to cause fewer complications compared with air-based foams.
Sclerotherapy techniques
Although the question of the total foam volume and its association with adverse events remains controversial, a more critical variable may be the volume of the injected gas that enters the deep venous system and subsequently the systemic venous circulation. The observation of embolic bubbles within minutes of injections indicates direct and rapid entry into the deep venous system. Such entry can happen via perforators or junctions with deep veins. Bubbles are observed to enter the right heart following the injection of 1–2.5 mL of the sclerosant foam. 109 In a recent study, manual compression or ligation of the saphenofemoral junction did not prevent, but reduced the flow of foam into the femoral vein. 162 In a study by the author, once the junction was occluded by the initial foam injection, subsequent injections in the proximal trunk of the great saphenous vein (GSV) did not result in further systemic embolization of bubbles. 109
As recommended by the ‘French School’, sclerosants are administered in a proximal to distal sequence of injections targeting the larger veins and the most proximal sources of reflux first. 163 By contrast, following the original Fegan approach, sclerosants are injected distally, and often directly into visible superficial tributaries 164 and when monitored by ultrasound, the infusion is continued until the foam has reached the junction. 97 Multiple small injections, as against a continuous infusion, have been shown to reduce the risk of deep vein occlusion post-sclerotherapy. 165 Treatment techniques possibly play a crucial role in the systemic dissemination of gas emboli and need to be compared in randomized trials.
Peri-venous tumescent anaesthesia 166 and catheter-directed sclerotherapy 167 are notable treatment modifications aimed at increasing the safety and efficacy of foam sclerotherapy. Perivenous tumescent anaesthesia may help to contain the injected foam to the intended target site.
Bubble size
The role of the bubble size in foam sclerotherapy is currently under investigation. 168 Bubble size has been identified as a risk factor for cerebral ischaemia associated with the echocardiogram ‘Bubble Study’ (see above Bubble Study and stroke). 72 Cerebral gas embolization can cause acute ischaemia from physical obstruction of vessels by large bubbles. 168 The average bubble radius produced with the Tessari method using air as the foaming gas is around 20 µm after 10 seconds, and 33 µm for STS and 38 µm for POL after 60 seconds. 107 CO2 foam bubbles are 25–30% smaller while the combined CO2/O2 bubbles (usually 70% CO2, 30% O2) are only 15–20% smaller than air-based foam bubbles. 107 Although the smaller size may allow for rapid transition through small cerebral arterioles, 6 bubbles can cause a progressive decline in the cerebral blood flow even if they do not completely occlude vessels. 117,121 In addition, bubble contact can affect the vascular endothelium 116–118 resulting in activation of the coagulation system, platelet aggregation and a thrombo-inflammatory response. 119,120
Bolus entry of gas emboli
Bolus entry of gas is more likely to cause clinical abnormalities compared with a slow release. 169 Rapid entry of air (>0.3 mL/kg/minute into the systemic venous circulation can result in significant inflammatory changes, 170 a rise in pulmonary artery pressures and right ventricular outflow obstruction. 120,171,172 Manual compression of the saphenous junctions at the time of foam sclerotherapy has been shown to release boluses of foam into the central venous circulation when the pressure is released. 151 This manoeuvre was reported in two published cases of stroke after sclerotherapy. 5,9 Immediate sitting up or standing following the procedure may also encourage the bolus entry of bubbles into the systemic circulation.
Foam stability
It is unknown whether a more stable foam is safer or whether the increased stability may lead to a higher incidence of complications such as deep vein occlusion or other unwanted distant adverse events. The physical properties of foam may influence the complication profile but this has not been systematically studied. There are many factors that influence the physical properties of foam and in particular its wetting half-life and stability. 81,107,173–175 The resorption time of bubbles depends on multiple factors, including the bubble shape, diffusivity, solubility, gas partial pressure gradients and vessel diameter. In turn, these depend on the gas–liquid surface tension, gas pressures in the bubble and gas pressures in the surrounding tissue. 176–178
It is unknown whether foam-derived bubbles reaching the brain maintain a thin film of detergent at the blood-gas interface (which would reduce the surface tension) or whether such bubbles are devoid of a surfactant surface. The direct effect of surfactant would be to reduce diffusion across the gas-liquid interface. 179,180 However, bubbles with a surfactant film exhibit greater mechanical compliance and are more likely to separate or elongate under the influence of external forces. 177,179 Such changes would increase the bubble's surface area resulting in an increase in gas diffusion 177,179 and a faster resorption time. 179
Other technical variables
Other variables include the type of syringe, three-way tap and filters used to generate the sclerosant foam. 175 Silicon in syringes acts as an antifoam and reduces the half-life of the generated foam. Certain three-way taps are designed to separate bubbles from the liquid as against those that increase the mixing. Filters would affect the size of the generated bubbles. All these factors and the liquid:gas ratios affect the physical properties of the generated foam.
Stroke and other venous procedures
Stroke and endovenous laser ablation
Tongues of thrombus have been observed following endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the GSV extending into the common femoral vein.
181,182
A recent case report described stroke following EVLA (980 nm)
183
and in another case, EVLA (1470 nm) was performed concurrently with foam sclerotherapy.
10
Loose thrombi released from the SFJ were thought to be responsible for PCE in these cases. Laser energy from EVLA can result in cavitation and the generated steam bubbles are visualized on ultrasound to enter the cardiac chambers during or soon after the procedure (N Morrison, personal communication via e-mail to K Parsi [
Stroke and venous surgery
Varicose vein surgery including stripping and avulsion is associated with a 5% frequency of DVT after the unilateral and up to 15% after the bilateral procedure. 184,185 Varicose vein surgery has been associated with PCE leading to stroke 186,187 and TIA. 187 A rare case of severe paradoxical gas (nitrous oxide) embolism has been reported during varicose vein stripping using a nitrous oxide cryoprobe. 188 A severe neurological events was recently reported to occur during AP. 189 In another case of stroke, AP was performed at the same time as sclerotherapy. 10
Management considerations
Prevention
Neurological ischaemic events following sclerotherapy are possibly multifactorial. It is clear from the evidence reviewed here that variable factors such as treatment parameters and individual's own risk factors at the time of the procedure possibly play an important role in the pathogenesis of the adverse events.
The presence of a RLS and in particular a PFO is the most consistent risk factor in this group of patients. Despite the risk, pre-sclerotherapy screening for PFO has not been considered practical or mandatory. 148,190,191 Preoperative screening and percutaneous closure of PFOs remain a controversial issue. Despite the 30% prevalence of PFO in the general population, the overall incidence of significant neurological complications of sclerotherapy remains very low. PFO closure procedures may be indicated in high-risk patients and in particular those with a past history of cryptogenic stroke or a long life history of recurrent classic migraine attacks (with aura). However, closure procedures are not risk-free and the long-term benefits of PFO closure in sclerotherapy patients is not known. Furthermore, the number of PFO closure procedures that need to be done to prevent a single major neurological event in sclerotherapy patients in unknown. The role of preoperative screening and percutaneous closure of PFOs needs to be incorporated in future randomized studies.
From a practical point of view, Valsalva and other manoeuvres that would open a PFO should be avoided during and immediately after the procedure. Hence, compression stockings are best applied by the medical staff rather than the patient at the end of the procedure.
The morbidity and mortality of gas embolism is related to the volume of gas, rate of entrainment, the patient's underlying cardiorespiratory status, and the patient's position. To reduce the embolic gas volume, it is essential to limit the entry of the injected sclerosant into the deep venous system and non-target veins. Although it may be argued that the injected foam is tracked and followed by ultrasound in the target vein, which may justify the infusion of large volumes, the entry of the injected foam into the perforators and the deep venous system along the way can be missed on ultrasound. Hence, it is highly prudent to limit the volume of the injected sclerosant, per injection site, to an absolute minimum. 165 Compression of the SFJ and its subsequent release after the injection may lead to the bolus entry of foam into the systemic venous circulation and is possibly best avoided. 151 Catheterizing the target vein combined with perivenous tumescent anaesthesia may help to reduce the volume required to achieve vessel closure and hence reduce the bubble load entering the deep venous system. 167 Leg elevation and other reported manoeuvres are ineffective in prevention of VGE 109,151 and are best avoided. Finally, CO2 as a physiological foaming gas may be safer than room air and should be further assessed in future studies.
Stroke with an immediate onset
An immediate onset (within minutes) of stroke after foam sclerotherapy should raise the possibility of gas embolism. VGE presents with dyspnoea and continuous cough, hypotension and dizziness, ‘gasp’ reflex and substernal chest pain. A ‘mill wheel’ murmur may be produced by movement of bubbles in the right ventricle.
Coronary artery air embolism can present with chest tightness and pain, coronary artery spasm, ischaemia, arrhythmias and myocardial infarction. Cerebral gas embolism can present with confusion, focal neurological symptoms and stroke. 120,170,192–194
Patients with symptomatic VGE should be placed immediately in the left lateral decubitus position to reduce entry into the pulmonary arteries and a possible subsequent right ventricular outflow obstruction. 106 In one reported PSS case, the patient was in the left lateral decubitus position during sclerotherapy but developed neurological symptoms when turned over to the supine position with the leg elevated. 10
In suspected PGE, head-down position is recommended for up to 10 minutes to clear bubbles from the cerebral circulation. 106 Head-down position for more than 10 minutes can worsen cerebral oedema and the patient should be returned to a supine position. 195 100% Oxygen should be administered. 196
PGE should be confirmed by imaging of bubbles in the intracranial and brain-supplying arterial circulation. Timing of imaging is crucial and a delay in neuroimaging may result in the resorption of embolic bubbles and a subsequent negative finding.
Hyperbaric oxygen has been recommended in the immediate treatment of gas embolism to enhance the diffusion of nitrogen into blood, compression of existing bubbles, improving the oxygenation of ischaemic tissues and lowering the intracranial pressure. 6,110,197 Some studies, however, have found hyperbaric treatment not to influence the clinical outcome and hence its routine use has not been universally advocated. 198–200
There are limited data available regarding the aetiology of PSS cases with an immediate onset after liquid sclerotherapy. In such cases, the management should follow the standard stroke guidelines and selected patients may benefit from thrombolytic therapy. 200 The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III, the American Heart Association and the American Stroke Association have found thrombolytic therapy to be efficacious in improving neurologic outcomes, suggesting a treatment window of 3–4.5 hours for the administration of thrombolytic agents such as recombinant t-PA. 201
Stroke with a delayed onset
In PSS cases with a delayed onset, thorough duplex ultrasound imaging of lower limb veins should be performed to look for a thrombotic source. Particular attention should be paid to avoid failure to detect venous thrombosis on ultrasound (see section Failure to detect venous thrombosis on ultrasound in sclerotherapy patients). The management of stroke should follow the standard stroke guidelines. 200
Summary
Thirteen cases of stroke have been reported to follow sclerotherapy since 1994. This adverse event, although significant, has remained a rare complication of a very popular procedure. The majority of the affected patients recovered completely with no long-term sequelae. Paradoxical embolism is thought to be the most probable cause. An immediate onset after foam sclerotherapy is most likely indicative of PGE and a late onset possibly signals PCE. Release of cell-derived by-products of sclerosants, such as PMP, inhibitors of fibrinolysis and endothelin possibly play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of neurological and other complications of sclerotherapy and need to be investigated in detailed clinical studies.
All published PSS cases of PGE have followed the use of air-based foams and hence the role of CO2 as a physiological foaming gas deserves further attention. The role of preoperative screening and percutaneous closure of PFOs needs to be incorporated in future randomized studies.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Drs Ron Bush, Attilio Cavezzi, Alessandro Frulini, JJ Guex, Jean-Luc Gillet, Martin Hahn, Thabele Leslie-Mawzi, Nick Morrison, Jean-Marc Bugnicourt, Professor Ken Myers and Dr John Pereira for helpful comments and personal communication. I thank Dr David Connor for comments on the manuscript and Anne Pilotelle, Robert Ma and Evan Cameron for assisting with the literature search and preparation of this manuscript.
