Reservoir Heterogeneity Affecting Steam Communication between Multiple Well-Pairs for Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of reservoir heterogeneity on steam communication and well-interference between multiple steam chambers during SAGD (steam assisted gravity drainage) process. The conventional steam stimulation for developing oil sands uses well pad system composed of several well pairs, so that the heat interference occurs when the steam chambers merge with each other. The numerical simulations using multiple SAGD well pairs were conducted in a heterogeneous formation and compared with those of a homogeneous case in terms of the production performances. Reservoir heterogeneity could make uneven steam communication, unequal chamber growth and leave unrecovered area, thereby giving the negative effect on oil production. Both production profiles of water and oil, and cSOR (cumulative steam to oil ratio) of individual SAGD pair would be good indicators to diagnose steam movement between chambers. The results discussed the negative effect of reservoir heterogeneity making unequal growth of vapor chamber and energy inefficiency due to horizontal movement of injected steam, and the necessity of identifying the indicators to characterize the chamber growth.

Keywords

Reservoir heterogeneity Steam communication Well pair Steam assisted gravity drainage

References

Albahlani

A.M.

and Babadagli

, 2008. A critical review of the state of SAGD: Where are we and what is next. Presented at SPE Western Regional and Pacific Section AAPG Joint Meeting, March 31 – April 2, 2008. Bakersfield, California. (SPE paper 113283).

Alturki

Gates

I.D.

and Maini

, 2011. On SAGD in oil sands reservoirs with no caprock and top water zone. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 50(3), 21–33.

Baker

Fong

Bowes

and Toews

, 2008. Practical considerations of reservoir heterogeneities on SAGD projects. Presented at SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, October 20–23, Calgary, Canada. (SPE Paper 117525).

Baker

Fong

Bowes

and Toews

, 2010. Understanding volumetric sweep efficiency in SAGD project. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 49(1), 30–37.

Computer Modelling Group(CMG), 2012. User's Guide STARS: Advanced Process and Thermal Reservoir Simulator (Version 2012). Computer Modelling Group Ltd., Calgary, Canada.

Gates

I.D.

and Chakrabarty

, 2006. Optimization of steam-assisted gravity drainage in McMurray reservoir. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 45(9), 54–62

Gates

I.D.

Kenny

Hernandez-Hdez

I.L.

and Bunio

G.L.

, 2007. Steam-injection strategy and energetics of steam-assisted gravity drainage. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering 10(1), 19–34.

Kam

Park

Min

and Kang

J.M.

, 2013. An optimal operation strategy of injection pressures in solvent-aided thermal recovery for viscous oil in sedimentary reservoirs. Petroleum Science and Technology 31(22), 2378–2387.

Kashihara

and Hosokoshi

, 2008. Effect of mud clasts on stochastic permeability modeling for steam assisted gravity drainage(SAGD) production forecasting in the Athabasca oil sands, Canada. Presented at The International Petroleum Technology Conference, December 3–5, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. (SPE Paper 12332).

10.

Law

D.H.S.

Nasr

T.N.

and Good

W.K.

, 2003. Field-scale numerical simulation of SAGD process with top-water thief zone. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. 42(8), 32–38.

11.

Nasr

T.N.

and Ayodele

O.R.

, 2005. Thermal techniques for the recovery of heavy oil and bitumen. Presented at SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference, December 5–6, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. (SPE paper 97488).